N省非法口供排除規(guī)則運(yùn)行情況調(diào)查報(bào)告
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-14 13:42
【摘要】：本論文共有引言和四部分組成。引言部分對(duì)非法口供的概念以及目前我國(guó)法律對(duì)非法口供排除規(guī)則的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了界定。以法律規(guī)定為視角,突出非法口供排除規(guī)則在當(dāng)今司法制度中重要性的變化過程。并介紹本文調(diào)研的對(duì)象、方法。第一部分首先通過問卷調(diào)查的方式收集當(dāng)下N省刑事審判中非法口供排除規(guī)則的運(yùn)用情況,問卷的內(nèi)容覆蓋6個(gè)問題,從啟動(dòng)、調(diào)查、認(rèn)定三個(gè)方面展現(xiàn)非法口供排除規(guī)則的具體實(shí)施狀況;其次,運(yùn)用真實(shí)的案例來反映非法口供排除規(guī)則在具體案件中的個(gè)中遭遇;第三,筆者對(duì)相關(guān)法律人士進(jìn)行了訪談,人員設(shè)置包括法官、檢察官和律師。收集的信息集中反映辦案過程中對(duì)非法口供案件的處理、遇到的問題以及完善建議等。最后,簡(jiǎn)要總結(jié)三種途徑收集信息反映的共同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn)。這一章僅做客觀的現(xiàn)狀描述,未做價(jià)值評(píng)價(jià)。第二部分以N省非法口供排除規(guī)則實(shí)際運(yùn)作為基礎(chǔ),擺出非法口供排除規(guī)則“四不”的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題,即:非法口供排除規(guī)則不管用、不會(huì)用、不愿用、不敢用。正是這些問題的存在,使得非法口供排除規(guī)則的落實(shí)情況不容樂觀,離我國(guó)刑事訴訟法的立法精神、要求很遠(yuǎn)。第三部分從案件的偵查、公訴、審判環(huán)節(jié)以及辯方四方面層層檢討,深入查找非法口供排除規(guī)則現(xiàn)實(shí)問題的成因。多視角、全方位的掃描各個(gè)主體如何操實(shí)踐該規(guī)則,進(jìn)而分析該規(guī)則呈現(xiàn)問題的原因。第一,偵查環(huán)節(jié)存在偵查條件差、偵查意識(shí)不強(qiáng)等問題,急于破案、立功心切,產(chǎn)生非法口供的可能性最大;第二,檢察機(jī)關(guān)監(jiān)督軟使得非法口供順利流向?qū)徟协h(huán)節(jié)直至成為定案依據(jù);第三,審判作為權(quán)利救濟(jì)的最后一關(guān),在非法口供排除規(guī)則的適用中起著至關(guān)重要的作用,但在現(xiàn)實(shí)中,庭審“走過場(chǎng)”致使非法口供的審查流于形式,非法口供得不到理應(yīng)的排除;第四,刑事辯護(hù)方出現(xiàn)的被告人文化程度不高、擔(dān)心加重罪責(zé),以及律師辯護(hù)人介入案件遲,發(fā)揮職能較少等主客觀原因也使得非法口供難以得到排除。種種因素的結(jié)合導(dǎo)致非法口供排除規(guī)則面臨難以真正適用的困境。第四部分完善非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的建議。要做到確立程序性的訴權(quán)制約機(jī)制,提升辯護(hù)方的舉證能力來應(yīng)對(duì)“不管用”;要轉(zhuǎn)變“口供帝王”觀念,強(qiáng)化程序意識(shí)來應(yīng)對(duì)“不會(huì)用”;建議將非法口供的審理納入考核機(jī)制,并結(jié)合檢察監(jiān)督規(guī)則使用來共同應(yīng)對(duì)“不愿用”;以法院為中心,推行法官負(fù)責(zé)制應(yīng)對(duì)“不敢用”。針對(duì)四個(gè)問題,多措并舉,力促非法口供排除規(guī)則在N省刑事司法中發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的作用。
[Abstract]:This paper has an introduction and four parts. The introduction defines the concept of illegal confession and the connotation of the exclusion rule of illegal confession in Chinese law. From the perspective of legal regulations, this paper highlights the changing process of the importance of the rule of exclusion of illegal confessions in today's judicial system. The object and method of this paper are introduced. The first part collects the application of illegal confession exclusion rules in criminal trial in N province by means of questionnaire survey. The contents of the questionnaire cover 6 questions, starting from the start and investigating. To identify three aspects to show the specific implementation of illegal confession exclusion rules; Secondly, the use of real cases to reflect illegal confession exclusion rules in specific cases encountered; third, the author conducted interviews with relevant legal personnel, including judges, prosecutors and lawyers. The collected information reflects the handling of illegal confessions in the course of handling cases, problems encountered and suggestions for improvement. Finally, the common points and differences of the three ways to collect information are summarized briefly. This chapter is only an objective description of the status quo, not value evaluation. The second part is based on the actual operation of the exclusion rule of illegal confession in N province, and puts forward the practical problem of "four noes" in the rule of exclusion of illegal confession, that is, the rule of exclusion of illegal confession does not work, will not be used, does not want to use, and does not dare to use it. It is the existence of these problems that makes the implementation of illegal confession exclusion rules not optimistic and far from the legislative spirit of our criminal procedure law. In the third part, four aspects of investigation, public prosecution, trial and defense are reviewed to find out the causes of the practical problems of illegal confession exclusion rules. From many angles of view, every subject is scanned how to practice the rule, and then analyzes the reason why the rule presents problems. First, the investigation link exists the investigation condition is bad, the investigation consciousness is not strong and so on question, anxious to solve the case, does the meritorious work keenly, produces the illegal confession possibility most; Second, the supervision of the procuratorial organ makes the illegal confession flow smoothly to the trial link until it becomes the basis of the final case. Third, trial, as the last pass of right relief, plays a vital role in the application of the rule of exclusion of illegal confessions, but in reality, the examination of illegal confessions becomes a mere formality. Illegal confessions cannot be excluded as they ought to be; Fourth, the criminal defense of the defendant's education level is not high, worried about aggravated guilt, and lawyers and defenders involved in the case late, play a less subjective and objective reasons, such as illegal confessions are difficult to exclude. The combination of various factors leads to the difficulty of applying illegal confession exclusion rules. The fourth part is the suggestion of perfecting the exclusion rules of illegal evidence. It is necessary to establish procedural restriction mechanism of procedural right of action, improve the ability of proof of defense to deal with "not effective", change the concept of "confession emperor", and strengthen the sense of procedure to deal with "no use". It is suggested that the trial of illegal confessions should be brought into the examination mechanism and combined with the rules of procuratorial supervision to jointly deal with "unwilling to use", and to implement the system of judge responsibility as the center of the court to deal with "not using". Aiming at the four problems, the author tries to urge the rule of illegal confession exclusion to play its due role in the criminal justice of N province.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
本文編號(hào)：2408750
[Abstract]:This paper has an introduction and four parts. The introduction defines the concept of illegal confession and the connotation of the exclusion rule of illegal confession in Chinese law. From the perspective of legal regulations, this paper highlights the changing process of the importance of the rule of exclusion of illegal confessions in today's judicial system. The object and method of this paper are introduced. The first part collects the application of illegal confession exclusion rules in criminal trial in N province by means of questionnaire survey. The contents of the questionnaire cover 6 questions, starting from the start and investigating. To identify three aspects to show the specific implementation of illegal confession exclusion rules; Secondly, the use of real cases to reflect illegal confession exclusion rules in specific cases encountered; third, the author conducted interviews with relevant legal personnel, including judges, prosecutors and lawyers. The collected information reflects the handling of illegal confessions in the course of handling cases, problems encountered and suggestions for improvement. Finally, the common points and differences of the three ways to collect information are summarized briefly. This chapter is only an objective description of the status quo, not value evaluation. The second part is based on the actual operation of the exclusion rule of illegal confession in N province, and puts forward the practical problem of "four noes" in the rule of exclusion of illegal confession, that is, the rule of exclusion of illegal confession does not work, will not be used, does not want to use, and does not dare to use it. It is the existence of these problems that makes the implementation of illegal confession exclusion rules not optimistic and far from the legislative spirit of our criminal procedure law. In the third part, four aspects of investigation, public prosecution, trial and defense are reviewed to find out the causes of the practical problems of illegal confession exclusion rules. From many angles of view, every subject is scanned how to practice the rule, and then analyzes the reason why the rule presents problems. First, the investigation link exists the investigation condition is bad, the investigation consciousness is not strong and so on question, anxious to solve the case, does the meritorious work keenly, produces the illegal confession possibility most; Second, the supervision of the procuratorial organ makes the illegal confession flow smoothly to the trial link until it becomes the basis of the final case. Third, trial, as the last pass of right relief, plays a vital role in the application of the rule of exclusion of illegal confessions, but in reality, the examination of illegal confessions becomes a mere formality. Illegal confessions cannot be excluded as they ought to be; Fourth, the criminal defense of the defendant's education level is not high, worried about aggravated guilt, and lawyers and defenders involved in the case late, play a less subjective and objective reasons, such as illegal confessions are difficult to exclude. The combination of various factors leads to the difficulty of applying illegal confession exclusion rules. The fourth part is the suggestion of perfecting the exclusion rules of illegal evidence. It is necessary to establish procedural restriction mechanism of procedural right of action, improve the ability of proof of defense to deal with "not effective", change the concept of "confession emperor", and strengthen the sense of procedure to deal with "no use". It is suggested that the trial of illegal confessions should be brought into the examination mechanism and combined with the rules of procuratorial supervision to jointly deal with "unwilling to use", and to implement the system of judge responsibility as the center of the court to deal with "not using". Aiming at the four problems, the author tries to urge the rule of illegal confession exclusion to play its due role in the criminal justice of N province.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 閆召華;;“名禁實(shí)允”與“雖令不行”:非法證據(jù)排除難研究[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2014年02期
2 羅國(guó)良;劉靜坤;朱晶晶;;《關(guān)于建立健全防范刑事冤假錯(cuò)案工作機(jī)制的意見》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2014年05期
3 孫長(zhǎng)永;王彪;;審判階段非法證據(jù)排除問題實(shí)證考察[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2014年01期
4 王超;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的虛置化隱憂與優(yōu)化改革[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年12期
5 李海良;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則適用情況之實(shí)證研究——以東南地區(qū)某法院為例[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2013年11期
6 戴長(zhǎng)林;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則司法適用疑難問題研究[J];人民司法;2013年09期
7 李昌盛;;違法偵查行為的程序性制裁效果研究——以非法口供排除規(guī)則為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2012年03期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 沈德詠;;我們應(yīng)當(dāng)如何防范冤假錯(cuò)案[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年
，本文編號(hào)：2408750
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2408750.html
最近更新
教材專著
