【摘要】：刑訊逼供自古有之，，它不僅侵害公民的人身權(quán)利，同時(shí)容易引發(fā)錯(cuò)案的滋生，損害司法機(jī)關(guān)的公正形象，踐踏憲法和法律權(quán)威。本文立足于打擊刑訊逼供的客觀需要，通過剖析刑訊逼供的現(xiàn)實(shí)危害性，并且從歷史原因、司法人員的法治理念原因、法律制度原因三方面分析刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因，從而為遏制刑訊逼供提出法律建議及相關(guān)措施。 本文共由三個(gè)部分組成，第一個(gè)部分是從刑訊逼供的概念、刑訊逼供罪的犯罪構(gòu)成要件以及立法特征、我國刑訊逼供的歷史以及刑訊逼供的現(xiàn)實(shí)危害性，對(duì)刑訊逼供進(jìn)行總體的論述。具體來講，首先論述刑訊逼供的概念，接著闡述我國刑法關(guān)于刑訊逼供罪的法律規(guī)定以及立法特征，通過探討刑訊逼供罪的三項(xiàng)立法特征即特殊的犯罪主體、特定的犯罪對(duì)象、具有概括性的行為方式，該部分為論文第二部分中“刑訊逼供罪法條本身設(shè)計(jì)的缺陷與不足”的論述做鋪墊，并且從刑訊逼供罪的犯罪構(gòu)成對(duì)該罪進(jìn)行法律分析，然后闡述我國刑訊逼供的歷史，并且按照發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)引出刑訊逼供的司法現(xiàn)狀與現(xiàn)實(shí)危害性。第二部分和第三部分是本文的重心，其中，第二部分從歷史原因、司法人員的法治理念原因、法律制度原因三方面剖析刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因，為論文第三部分“遏制對(duì)策”提供理論和實(shí)踐依據(jù)。第三部分是論文的對(duì)策部分，筆者建議從樹立人權(quán)保障理念和程序正義觀念，健全遏制刑訊逼供的法律制度兩方面入手，為遏制刑訊逼供提出對(duì)策，最后得出結(jié)論：遏制刑訊逼供是一項(xiàng)繁雜的系統(tǒng)工程，需要我們不斷努力和探索，完善相關(guān)立法，建立可行的法律運(yùn)作機(jī)制，提高執(zhí)法人員水平，樹立保障人權(quán)的法制觀念，做到實(shí)體正義與程序正義并重，樹立司法威嚴(yán)，提高司法效率。
[Abstract]:Extorting confessions by torture since ancient times not only infringes on citizens' personal rights, but also easily leads to the breeding of wrong cases, damages the justice image of judicial organs and tramples on the constitutional and legal authority. Based on the objective need of cracking down on extorting confessions by torture, this paper analyzes the actual harmfulness of extorting confessions by torture, and analyzes the causes of extorting confessions by torture from three aspects: the historical reasons, the reasons of judicial personnel's concept of rule of law, the reasons of legal system, and the reasons of extorting confessions by torture. Thus, legal suggestions and relevant measures are put forward to curb the extortion of confessions by torture. The first part is from the concept of extorting confessions by torture, the elements of the crime of extorting confessions by torture and the legislative characteristics, the history of extorting confessions by torture in China and the practical harmfulness of extorting confessions by torture. A general discussion of extorting confessions by torture. Specifically speaking, the concept of extorting confessions by torture is discussed first, and then the legal provisions and legislative features of the crime of extorting confessions by torture in criminal law of our country are expounded. By discussing the three legislative characteristics of the crime of extorting confessions by torture, namely, the special subject of crime and the specific object of crime, This part paves the way for the discussion of "the defect and insufficiency of the law of extorting confessions by torture itself" in the second part of the thesis, and analyzes the crime from the criminal constitution of the crime of extorting confessions by torture. Then the history of extorting confessions by torture in our country is expounded, and the judicial status and practical harmfulness of extorting confessions by torture are deduced according to the developing context. The second part is the focus of this paper. The second part analyzes the reasons of extorting confessions by torture from three aspects: historical reasons, the reasons of judicial personnel's legal concept, the reasons of legal system, and the reasons of extorting confessions by torture. It provides theoretical and practical basis for the third part of the paper, containment countermeasures. The third part is the countermeasure part of the thesis, the author proposes to set up the concept of human rights guarantee and the concept of procedural justice, perfect the legal system of restraining the extortion of confessions by torture, and put forward countermeasures to curb the extortion of confessions by torture. Finally, it is concluded that curbing the extortion by torture is a complicated and systematic project, which requires us to make continuous efforts and exploration, to perfect the relevant legislation, to establish a feasible legal operation mechanism, to raise the level of law enforcement personnel, and to establish the legal concept of protecting human rights. We should pay equal attention to substantive justice and procedural justice, establish judicial authority and improve judicial efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 姜雪;;刑訊逼供的原因及控制[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年09期

本文編號(hào)：2326667