發(fā)布時間：2018-11-08 09:07

【摘要】：審辯關(guān)系是刑事訴訟中的一個重要問題。近年來,我國審辯關(guān)系呈現(xiàn)異化的趨勢,司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的審辯沖突和辯審?fù)讌f(xié)現(xiàn)象背離了審辯關(guān)系的應(yīng)有本質(zhì),不利于律師辯護權(quán)的保障,同時也不利于司法公正的實現(xiàn)。十八屆四中全會提出的"審判中心主義"需要審辯關(guān)系的回歸。哈貝馬斯的"商談理論"為審辯關(guān)系的研究提供了新的視角和框架。審辯關(guān)系的回歸需要從理念、訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)和制度層面著手,在保障法官中立的基礎(chǔ)上強化法官闡明義務(wù),合理規(guī)制法官的訴訟指揮權(quán),賦予律師及時聲明異議的權(quán)利,提高律師的辯護技巧,使得辯護律師和法官能夠有效履行說服者和中立判斷者的角色。
[Abstract]:The relationship between trial and defense is an important issue in criminal proceedings. In recent years, the relationship between trial and debate in our country presents the trend of alienation. The phenomenon of conflict and compromise in judicial practice deviates from the proper nature of the relationship between trial and debate, which is not conducive to the protection of lawyers' right to defense, and also to the realization of judicial justice. The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee called for the return of the relationship between trial and debate. Habermas's Theory of negotiation provides a new perspective and framework for the study of the relationship between trial and argument. The return of the relationship between trial and argument needs to proceed from the aspects of concept, litigation structure and system, strengthen the obligation of the judge on the basis of ensuring the neutrality of the judge, regulate the judge's command of action reasonably, and endow the lawyer with the right to declare dissent in time. Improve lawyers' defense skills to enable defense lawyers and judges to effectively perform the role of persuasion and neutral judges.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D925.2
，

本文編號：2318017