發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-07 12:15

【摘要】：民事再審事由是通往民事再審程序的一張大門，而新的證據(jù)是重要的再審事由之一，但是我國(guó)民事訴訟法和相關(guān)司法解釋關(guān)于新的證據(jù)的規(guī)定存在矛盾和沖突，在司法實(shí)踐中也存在著諸多弊端，而對(duì)新的證據(jù)進(jìn)行限制，是世界立法發(fā)展的潮流，就再審新的證據(jù)而言，我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》并沒有明確規(guī)定如何適用再審新的證據(jù)，只在司法解釋中有所體現(xiàn)，但是也存在不完善的問題，沒有使新的證據(jù)在再審中發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用。完善再審程序新的證據(jù)規(guī)則，建立各項(xiàng)配套制度，使新的證據(jù)制度發(fā)揮其效能，則顯得十分必要。本文首先對(duì)我國(guó)民事再審新的證據(jù)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析，，通過對(duì)再審程序中的新的證據(jù)和一、二審程序中的新的證據(jù)比較，概括出民事再審程序中新的證據(jù)的概念，介紹了我國(guó)立法、司法解釋中關(guān)于民事再審程序新的證據(jù)有關(guān)規(guī)定，闡述了民事再審程序中新的證據(jù)的價(jià)值取向；其次剖析和比較各國(guó)立法例，本部分通過對(duì)大陸法系關(guān)于新的證據(jù)立法的比較分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)新的證據(jù)在其立法中或多或少都有所體現(xiàn)，但是由于各國(guó)各地區(qū)的審判模式、法律觀念、法律傳統(tǒng)存在差異，新的證據(jù)的表現(xiàn)形式各不相同；最后指出了我國(guó)再審程序中新的證據(jù)存在的問題，就重新確立民事再審新的證據(jù)的要件和認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，如何完善民事再審新的證據(jù)的各項(xiàng)制度提出筆者個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn),使新的證據(jù)規(guī)則發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的效用。
[Abstract]:The cause of civil retrial is a gateway to the civil retrial procedure, and the new evidence is one of the important reasons for retrial. However, there are contradictions and conflicts between the civil procedure law and the relevant judicial interpretation of the new evidence. There are many disadvantages in the judicial practice, and restricting the new evidence is the trend of the development of the world legislation. As far as the new evidence of retrial is concerned, the Civil procedure Law of our country has not clearly stipulated how to apply the new evidence of the retrial. Only reflected in the judicial interpretation, but also there are imperfect problems, did not make the new evidence in the retrial play its due role. It is necessary to perfect the new evidence rules of retrial procedure, to establish various supporting systems and to make the new evidence system exert its efficiency. This paper first analyzes the present situation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure in China. By comparing the new evidence in the retrial procedure with the new evidence in the first and second instance procedure, the author generalizes the concept of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. This paper introduces the new evidential provisions of the civil retrial procedure in the legislation and judicial interpretation of our country, and expounds the value orientation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the new evidence legislation in the civil law system, it is found that the new evidence is more or less embodied in the legislation, but due to the trial mode in various countries and regions, There are differences in legal concepts and legal traditions, and the forms of expression of new evidence are different; Finally, it points out the existing problems of the new evidence in the procedure of retrial in our country, and puts forward the author's personal views on how to re-establish the elements and standards of the new evidence in the civil retrial, and how to perfect the various systems of the new evidence in the civil retrial. Make the new rule of evidence work as it should.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊躍敏;;民事再審案件審理程序論略——以再審訴權(quán)為基礎(chǔ)的程序建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年01期

2 薛煥彬;;民事再審程序中新證據(jù)的理解與適用[J];法學(xué)與實(shí)踐;2007年02期

3 黃維智;;刑事案件中“情況說(shuō)明”的適當(dāng)定位[J];法學(xué);2007年07期

4 許彩云;趙強(qiáng);;論我國(guó)民事審前程序的完善[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

5 孫轍;新的證據(jù)與相對(duì)化的舉證時(shí)限制度[J];人民司法;2002年05期

6 李后龍;花玉軍;葛文;;再審新證據(jù)認(rèn)定和運(yùn)用的實(shí)證分析[J];人民司法;2009年21期

7 姜龍;馬忠瑜;;民事再審程序中“新證據(jù)”規(guī)定的不足與完善[J];山東審判(山東法官培訓(xùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2006年03期

8 陳洪杰;;新《民事訴訟法》中的“新的證據(jù)”應(yīng)作如何理解——兼與張衛(wèi)平教授商榷[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2008年03期

9 付婷婷;;民事再審啟動(dòng)事由中新證據(jù)的界定[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

10 李浩;;舉證時(shí)限制度的困境與出路——追問證據(jù)失權(quán)的正義性[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2005年03期

本文編號(hào)：2316344