發(fā)布時間：2018-10-15 20:44

【摘要】：中間確認(rèn)判決,是指在民事訴訟過程中,終局判決作出前,法院對當(dāng)事人的訴訟請求所基于的先決法律關(guān)系或基礎(chǔ)權(quán)利存在與否的爭議和事實所作出的判決。中間確認(rèn)判決制度的確立,旨在保障當(dāng)事人的訴訟權(quán)利行使、提升審判的質(zhì)效以及促進(jìn)當(dāng)事人合意解決糾紛。遺憾的是,我國對中間確認(rèn)判決的立法尚處于空白狀態(tài),而在理論上雖然對中間判決的研究較多,但對中間確認(rèn)判決進(jìn)行深入研究的卻鳳毛麟角,即使部分中間判決的研究提到了中間確認(rèn)判決,其也僅局限于中間確認(rèn)判決概念的簡單介紹,以至于學(xué)界至今還未對中間確認(rèn)判決引起足夠的重視,從而導(dǎo)致我國現(xiàn)行司法實踐對中間爭點(diǎn)的判定方式產(chǎn)生出許多問題。筆者旨在對這個研究盲點(diǎn)作出嘗試性的論證,從剖析中間確認(rèn)判決制度的理論基礎(chǔ)出發(fā),比較借鑒域外相關(guān)的規(guī)定,提出構(gòu)建我國中間確認(rèn)判決制度的立法建議,藉此試圖為合理解決民事訴訟中出現(xiàn)的實體性中間爭點(diǎn)提供一劑良方。本文緊緊圍繞民事訴訟中間確認(rèn)判決制度這一主題展開,分為前言、正文、結(jié)語三部分。各個部分的主要內(nèi)容如下:前言:簡要論述民事訴訟中間確認(rèn)判決制度以及在我國民事訴訟設(shè)置中間確認(rèn)判決的重要性。第一章:對中間確認(rèn)判決制度的基本理論進(jìn)行剖析,并考察與其相關(guān)的域外立法。內(nèi)容涉及中間確認(rèn)判決的概念及其界分、性質(zhì)、理論基礎(chǔ)以及德國、日本、我國臺灣地區(qū)的對中間確認(rèn)判決的立法等方面。第二章:分析我國在民事中間確認(rèn)判決制度缺失下的實踐狀況。在剖析我國現(xiàn)行對中間爭點(diǎn)判定的立法缺失的基礎(chǔ)上,引出我國實踐中對中間爭點(diǎn)的判定方式,揭示此種判定方式所導(dǎo)致的缺陷,并分析我國之所以缺失中間確認(rèn)判決制度的成因。第三章:論證在我國民事訴訟確立民事中間確認(rèn)判決制度的必要性。從中間爭點(diǎn)的先決性規(guī)律、中間確認(rèn)判決制度的特殊價值及其對審判方式改革的意義三個方面來闡述在我國確立中間確認(rèn)判決制度的必要。第四章:對具體構(gòu)建我國民事中間確認(rèn)判決制度進(jìn)行論述。本章從四個方面進(jìn)行論述,首先對中間確認(rèn)判決的對象進(jìn)行定位,其次是民事中間確認(rèn)判決的具體程序,接著再探討中間確認(rèn)判決的效力與救濟(jì),并提出與中間確認(rèn)判決制度相關(guān)配套措施的立法完善建議。結(jié)語:概括本文的內(nèi)容,并指出仍存在的不足之處。
[Abstract]:Intermediate confirmation judgment refers to the judgment made by the court on the dispute and fact of the existence or not of the prior legal relationship or the basic right of the litigant's claim before the final judgment is made in the process of civil action. The establishment of the intermediate confirmation judgment system aims to protect the litigant's right of action, improve the quality of the trial and promote the parties' consensual settlement of disputes. Unfortunately, the legislation of intermediate confirmation judgment in our country is still in a blank state, but in theory, although there are many studies on intermediate judgment, but there are very few in-depth studies on intermediate confirmation judgment. Even though some studies on intermediate judgment refer to intermediate confirmation judgment, it is limited to the brief introduction of the concept of intermediate confirmation judgment, so far, scholars have not paid enough attention to intermediate confirmation judgment. As a result, there are many problems in the judgment of the intermediate points in the current judicial practice of our country. The author aims to make a tentative demonstration of this blind spot of the study, proceed from analyzing the theoretical basis of the intermediate confirmation judgment system, compare and draw lessons from the relevant provisions of foreign countries, and put forward some legislative proposals for the construction of the intermediate confirmation judgment system in our country. In this way, the author tries to provide a good solution to the substantive disputes in civil litigation. This paper is divided into three parts: foreword, text and conclusion. The main contents of each part are as follows: preface: briefly discusses the system of intermediate confirmation judgment in civil litigation and the importance of setting up intermediate confirmation judgment in civil litigation in our country. Chapter one: analyze the basic theory of the system of intermediate confirmation, and investigate the relevant foreign legislation. The content involves the concept of intermediate confirmation judgment and its classification, nature, theoretical basis and the legislation of intermediate confirmation judgment in Germany, Japan and Taiwan. Chapter two: analyze the practice situation of our country in the absence of civil intermediate confirmation judgment system. On the basis of analyzing the lack of legislation on the judgment of intermediate dispute point in our country, this paper draws out the judgment method of intermediate dispute point in our country's practice, and reveals the defects caused by this kind of judgment method. And analyzes the reason why our country lacks the intermediate confirmation judgment system. Chapter three: to demonstrate the necessity of establishing the system of civil intermediate confirmation in civil litigation in China. This paper expounds the necessity of establishing the intermediate confirmation judgment system in our country from three aspects: the law of the pre-decision of the intermediate dispute point, the special value of the intermediate confirmation judgment system and its significance to the reform of the trial mode. Chapter IV: the concrete construction of civil confirmation judgment system in China. This chapter discusses from four aspects, first of all, positioning the object of intermediate confirmation judgment, secondly, the specific procedure of civil intermediate confirmation judgment, and then discussing the effectiveness and relief of intermediate confirmation judgment. And puts forward the legislation consummation suggestion of the supporting measures related to the intermediate confirmation judgment system. Conclusion: summarize the content of this paper, and point out the shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 段文波;;構(gòu)建我國民事訴訟中間判決制度論——對德國和日本民事中間判決制度的借鑒[J];政治與法律;2009年10期

2 傅郁林;;先決問題與中間裁判[J];中國法學(xué);2008年06期

3 劉文鵬;;一種結(jié)果,兩個判決,三重浪費(fèi)——論中間判決制度的確立意義[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年13期

4 謝阿桑;關(guān)于確立我國民事訴訟中間判決制度的思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2004年03期

5 張晉紅;關(guān)于中間確認(rèn)判決制度的立法思考[J];中國法學(xué);2002年05期

6 江偉;劉敏;;論民事訴訟模式的轉(zhuǎn)換與法官的釋明權(quán)[J];訴訟法論叢;2001年00期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 鄭磊;;論先決問題的司法判定模式——兼議民事訴訟中間裁判制度之完善[A];全國法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 應(yīng)夏楠;民事訴訟中間判決制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 陳建彪;中間確認(rèn)之訴研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2273778