【摘要】：未成年人是社會(huì)的未來和希望,未成年人刑事司法理應(yīng)以弱化懲罰功能,強(qiáng)化教育挽救功能,更加注重發(fā)揮保護(hù)和預(yù)防功能為己任。這也符合國際社會(huì)所倡導(dǎo)的未成年人刑事司法“非刑事化、非監(jiān)禁化、輕刑化”的價(jià)值理念。但是追求未成年人刑罰設(shè)置的非監(jiān)禁化以及刑罰執(zhí)行的社會(huì)化,并不意味著簡單地將其置于社會(huì)處遇中即可,要想達(dá)到教育挽救的目的,相關(guān)制度的設(shè)立就顯得尤為關(guān)鍵。未成年人觀護(hù)制度正是在這種背景下應(yīng)運(yùn)而生的,因其對(duì)未成年人刑事司法的關(guān)鍵意義,逐漸演變?yōu)楝F(xiàn)代未成年人刑事司法不可或缺的重要制度之一 除臺(tái)灣和港澳地區(qū)以外,我國尚未正式確立未成年人觀護(hù)制度。但是2012年新修訂的刑事訴訟法在未成年人刑事訴訟程序中正式規(guī)定了附條件不起訴,為涉嫌輕微犯罪的未成年人提供了社會(huì)處遇中接受教育矯正以代替監(jiān)禁刑罰的法律依據(jù)。正是以此為契機(jī),本文提出了構(gòu)建附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的構(gòu)想,在附條件不起訴的監(jiān)督考察環(huán)節(jié),借鑒觀護(hù)制度的理念和內(nèi)容設(shè)計(jì),對(duì)涉罪未成年人進(jìn)行監(jiān)督、管束、教育、幫助以及保護(hù),從而達(dá)到恢復(fù)其社會(huì)功能,促進(jìn)其回歸社會(huì)的訴求,發(fā)揮權(quán)利保護(hù)和預(yù)防犯罪的功能。 本文分為四大部分,在闡述附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度相關(guān)概念的基礎(chǔ)上,分析了當(dāng)前我國構(gòu)建附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的必要性和可行性,并對(duì)附條件不起觀護(hù)主體和程序的構(gòu)建進(jìn)行了探討和分析： 第一部分對(duì)本文提出的附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定。首先對(duì)觀護(hù)制度的內(nèi)涵和外延進(jìn)行了介紹,并總結(jié)了本文提出的附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度中觀護(hù)的應(yīng)有之義。其次強(qiáng)調(diào)了附條件不起訴的前提,它界定了附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的適用對(duì)象與程序設(shè)計(jì)。 第二部分論述了當(dāng)前在我國構(gòu)建附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的必要性與可行性。從附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度在貫徹關(guān)于未成年人特殊保護(hù)的原則、彌補(bǔ)附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察環(huán)節(jié)的不足以及促進(jìn)未成年人回歸社會(huì)等方面的意義,闡述了構(gòu)建附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的必要性�；謴�(fù)性司法和教育刑理念的深入和推廣,國外及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)觀護(hù)制度的成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn)為我國構(gòu)建附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度提供了理論基礎(chǔ)和有益參考,亦使其具備了可行性。 第三部分討論了附條件不起訴觀護(hù)主體的構(gòu)建。明確了檢察機(jī)關(guān)決定主體和監(jiān)督執(zhí)行主體的職能定位；在觀護(hù)執(zhí)行主體上以司法社工為核心,分析了其在專業(yè)知識(shí)、專業(yè)理念和專業(yè)角色方面與附條件不起訴觀護(hù)制度的契合；社會(huì)力量是輔助的觀護(hù)執(zhí)行主體,主要表現(xiàn)為其他國家機(jī)關(guān)和基層群眾性自治組織、第三部門以及公司、企業(yè)與社會(huì)志愿者等機(jī)構(gòu)和人員。 第四部分探討了附條件不起訴觀護(hù)程序的構(gòu)建。從社會(huì)調(diào)查程序前置以及具體程序設(shè)置兩個(gè)階段強(qiáng)調(diào)了附條件不起訴觀護(hù)程序的緊密銜接,并對(duì)觀護(hù)整體工作形成有力監(jiān)督。
[Abstract]:Juveniles are the future and hope of the society. Juvenile criminal justice should weaken the function of punishment, strengthen the function of education and rescue, and pay more attention to the function of protection and prevention. The non-imprisonment of adult penalty and the socialization of penalty execution do not mean simply placing it in social circumstances. To achieve the purpose of education and salvation, the establishment of relevant systems is particularly critical. The key meaning has gradually evolved into one of the indispensable systems of modern juvenile criminal justice.
In addition to Taiwan and Hong Kong and Macao, China has not formally established a minor care system. However, the newly revised Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 formally stipulates conditional non-prosecution in the minor criminal proceedings, providing minors suspected of minor crimes with social treatment in place of the law of imprisonment penalty by receiving education and correction. Based on this, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing conditional non-prosecution guardianship system. In the supervision and investigation link of conditional non-prosecution, the concept and content design of the guardianship system are used for reference to supervise, control, educate, help and protect juveniles involved in crimes, so as to restore their social functions and promote their return to society. Appealing to give full play to the functions of rights protection and crime prevention.
This paper is divided into four parts. On the basis of explaining the related concepts of conditional non-prosecution care system, the necessity and feasibility of constructing conditional non-prosecution care system in China are analyzed, and the construction of conditional non-prosecution care subject and procedure are discussed and analyzed.
The first part defines the relevant concepts of conditional non-prosecution care system proposed in this paper. First, it introduces the connotation and extension of the care system, and summarizes the proper meaning of care in conditional non-prosecution care system proposed in this paper. Secondly, it emphasizes the premise of conditional non-prosecution, which defines conditional non-prosecution. The application object and procedure design of the litigation protection system.
The second part elaborates the necessity and feasibility of constructing conditional non-prosecution care system in our country at present. The paper expounds the significance of conditional non-prosecution care system in implementing the principle of special protection for minors, making up for the insufficiency of supervision and inspection of conditional non-prosecution and promoting minors to return to society. It is necessary to establish conditional non-prosecution care system. The deepening and popularization of restorative justice and educational penalty concept, and the mature experience of foreign countries and Taiwan provide theoretical basis and useful reference for our country to construct conditional non-prosecution care system, and make it feasible.
The third part discusses the construction of the subject of conditional non-prosecution care. Quantity is an assistant subject of nursing execution, which is mainly manifested by other state organs and grass-roots mass autonomous organizations, the third sector, companies, enterprises and social volunteers and other institutions and personnel.
The fourth part discusses the construction of conditional non-prosecution nursing procedure, emphasizing the close connection of conditional non-prosecution nursing procedure from the two stages of social investigation procedure and specific procedure settings, and forming a strong supervision over the whole nursing work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪貽飛;;論社會(huì)調(diào)查報(bào)告對(duì)我國量刑程序改革的借鑒[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年01期

2 梅義征;;從日本、新西蘭社區(qū)矯正制度看我國社區(qū)矯正工作的發(fā)展方向[J];中國司法;2007年09期

3 公丕祥;;能動(dòng)司法與社會(huì)公信:人民法官司法方式的時(shí)代選擇——“陳燕萍工作法”的理論思考[J];法律適用;2010年04期

4 肖建國;我國刑事政策與青少年司法制度的改革[J];青少年犯罪問題;2003年01期

5 皮藝軍;姜甜甜;;中國少年司法制度建構(gòu)的本土特征[J];青少年犯罪問題;2007年04期

6 席小華;;社會(huì)工作介入少年司法制度之探究[J];青少年犯罪問題;2009年04期

7 李蘭英;程瑩;;新刑訴法關(guān)于未成年人刑事案件社會(huì)調(diào)查規(guī)定之評(píng)析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2012年06期

8 張金武;;美國北卡羅來納州社區(qū)矯正簡況[J];中國司法;2009年02期

9 黃暉麗;;未成年人附條件不起訴監(jiān)督考察工作探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年24期

10 周羚敏;;我國少年司法規(guī)則系統(tǒng)存在的若干缺陷和問題[J];河北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郝方f ;刑罰現(xiàn)代化研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2227608