【摘要】：中共十八屆四中全會通過的《中共中央關于全面推進依法治國若干重大問題的決定》中,首次提出要完善刑事訴訟中認罪認罰從寬制度。最高人民法院《人民法院第四個五年改革綱要(2014-2018)》以及最高人民檢察院《關于深化檢察改革的意見(2013-2017年工作規(guī)劃)》也提出要完善認罪認罰從寬制度。實際上,認罪認罰從寬制度在我國早已有之,《刑法》對此已有所規(guī)定,刑事訴訟中也有所體現。認罪認罰從寬制度的確立是寬嚴相濟刑事政策在刑事訴訟中的必然要求,其目的是為了更好的實現繁簡分流,優(yōu)化司法資源配置,提高司法效率。學界近年來對認罪認罰從寬制度的相關問題進行了一定探討,同時2016年9月3日,全國人大常委會通過了《關于授權最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院在部分地區(qū)開展刑事案件認罪認罰從寬制度試點工作的決定》,11月16日,“兩院三部”聯合印發(fā)《關于在部分地區(qū)開展刑事案件認罪認罰從寬試點工作的辦法》,這對刑事案件認罪認罰從寬試點工作的開展無疑具有重要指導意義。當然這實際上也必然會進一步促進對認罪認罰從寬制度理論研究的進一步深入�；诖�,結合刑事案件認罪認罰從寬試點工作的進行,本文以認罪認罰從寬制度的內涵、價值等為切入點,對這一制度在我國刑法與刑事訴訟法中的體現進行了分析,重點對認罪認罰從寬制度的確立、存在的問題以及具體建構舉措等問題進行了深入研究。筆者認為,認罪認罰從寬的啟動程序、庭審程序、處理標準的細化以及協商程序等應當是試點工作和學界亟需進一步深入探索與探討的問題。
[Abstract]:In the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on promoting the Rule of Law in an All-round way" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, it was proposed for the first time that the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing in criminal proceedings should be improved. The Supreme people's Court [the fourth Five-Year Reform outline of the people's Court (2014-2018)] and the Supreme people's Procuratorate's opinion on deepening the Procuratorial Reform (2013-2017 work Plan) also proposed that the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing should be improved. In fact, the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing has already existed in our country, which has been stipulated in the Criminal Law and reflected in the criminal procedure. The establishment of the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment is the inevitable requirement of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity in criminal proceedings. Its purpose is to better realize the diversion of complexity, optimize the allocation of judicial resources and improve judicial efficiency. In recent years, academic circles have made certain discussions about the system of leniency of plea, admission and punishment. On September 3, 2016, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC) adopted a decision on authorizing the Supreme people's Court. Decision of the Supreme people's Procuratorate on the pilot work on the system of lenient admission and punishment in Criminal cases in some regions. November 16, The joint publication of "three departments of the two Houses" on the pilot work on the leniency of plea and punishment in criminal cases in some regions is undoubtedly of great guiding significance to the implementation of the pilot work of leniency of plea and punishment in criminal cases. Of course, this will certainly further promote the further study of the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment. Based on this, combined with the trial work of leniency in criminal cases, this paper analyzes the embodiment of this system in our criminal law and criminal procedure law, taking the connotation and value of the system of guilty admission and punishment leniency as the starting point. It focuses on the establishment of lenient admission and punishment system, existing problems and concrete construction measures. The author believes that the lenient initiation procedure, trial procedure, fine processing standard and negotiation procedure should be the problems that need to be further explored and discussed in the experimental work and academic circles.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 魏愛軍;王帥;;刑事案件犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自報身份情況調研[J];法制與社會;2008年31期

2 何允申;;怎樣認識刑事案件持續(xù)上升的趨勢[J];公安大學學報;1988年06期

3 趙進一;;無知釀成悲劇——本市外來人口刑事案件根源探[J];上海成人教育;1994年Z2期

4 郭浩善;論少年刑事案件審判中的觀念轉變[J];青少年犯罪問題;1997年04期

5 杜桂蘭;李某的行為是否構成不移交刑事案件罪[J];當代法學;1999年S1期

6 曹勇;刑事案件公開審判中的幾點注意事項[J];法律適用;1999年04期

7 ;中華全國律師協會關于律師辦理刑事案件的十項要求[J];中國律師;1999年07期

8 肖祖瀚;;報復社會嚴重刑事案件激增的四大主因[J];中國經濟周刊;2013年49期

9 何冰;;新加坡社會為何安定[J];人民文摘;2007年06期

10 ;信息[J];時代教育(先鋒國家歷史);2008年06期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 洪源;;m鏨倌晷淌擄訃⺁u查制度的v|展、形成及其方戄和基本原RG[A];少年刑事司法制度學術研討會論文集[C];2001年

2 甘雅玲;郭中偉;劉明輝;陳占河;;刑事案件中動物毛發(fā)的掃描電鏡研究[A];第三屆全國掃描電子顯微學會議論文集[C];2003年

3 饒輝華;;10年100件公眾關注刑事案件的普遍性問題探究[A];建設公平正義社會與刑事法律適用問題研究-全國法院第24屆學術討論會獲獎論文集（上冊）[C];2012年

4 呂娜娜;;論我國刑事案件二審開庭審理制度[A];當代法學論壇（2008年第1輯）[C];2008年

5 樊京京;;醉酒駕駛機動車刑事案件中血液酒精含量檢測若干問題探討[A];貴州法學（2014年第6期）[C];2014年

6 裴}，

本文編號：2180178