【摘要】：在英美法系國家的民事訴訟程序中，審前程序具有舉足輕重的地位，與庭審程序并列成為現(xiàn)代民事糾紛解決的兩大途徑。民事審前程序在我國還處于發(fā)展的萌芽期，只是庭審程序前的準(zhǔn)備階段，更談不上成為解決糾紛的獨(dú)立程序。隨著社會的變革糾紛的增加，法院的訴訟壓力與日俱增。本著提高訴訟效率、節(jié)約訴訟成本的理念，對我國審前程序的功能進(jìn)行重構(gòu)，以實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)訴訟、公正司法的宏觀目標(biāo)。 審前程序的核心功能是爭點(diǎn)整理、證據(jù)固定，以實(shí)現(xiàn)糾紛解決審前化和庭審程序集中化的雙重現(xiàn)實(shí)司法目標(biāo)。這就要求審前程序高度獨(dú)立于庭審程序而存在，在此基礎(chǔ)上對爭點(diǎn)整理功能、證據(jù)固定功能的重構(gòu)才能發(fā)揮出糾紛解決審前化的有效作用。通過對英美法系國家和大陸法系國家不同司法理念下審前程序的規(guī)定，運(yùn)用比較研究的方法進(jìn)行分析論證，在借鑒國外成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合我國司法實(shí)務(wù)現(xiàn)狀以實(shí)現(xiàn)審前程序的功能在訴訟中的巨大作用。在一定程度上緩解法院的訴訟壓力，同時(shí)最大限度保障當(dāng)事人的訴訟權(quán)利和實(shí)體權(quán)益。最終達(dá)到高效、經(jīng)濟(jì)和公正的解決民事糾紛這一宏觀司法目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure of Anglo-American legal system, pretrial procedure plays an important role, and it is the two main ways of modern civil dispute resolution. Civil pretrial procedure is still in the embryonic stage of development in our country. It is only the preparation stage before the trial procedure, let alone the independent procedure for resolving disputes. With the increase of social change and disputes, the pressure of court litigation is increasing day by day. Based on the idea of improving the efficiency of litigation and saving the cost of litigation, this paper reconstructs the function of our country's pretrial procedure in order to realize the macroscopic goal of economic litigation and just administration of justice. The core function of pretrial procedure is to collate the points and fix the evidence in order to realize the dual realistic judicial goal of dispute resolution and trial procedure centralization. This requires that the pretrial procedure is highly independent of the trial procedure, and on this basis, the function of collating the points of contention and the reconstruction of the fixed function of evidence can play an effective role in dispute resolution. Through the provisions of pretrial procedure under different judicial concepts in Anglo-American law system countries and civil law countries, and using the method of comparative study to analyze and demonstrate, on the basis of drawing lessons from the mature experience of foreign countries, In order to realize the function of pretrial procedure, the judicial practice in our country plays an important role in litigation. At the same time, the litigant rights and substantive rights and interests of the parties are protected as much as possible. Finally, to achieve an efficient, economic and fair settlement of civil disputes this macro-judicial goal.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮文生;爭點(diǎn)整理程序研究[J];法律適用;2005年02期

2 陳希;;民事訴訟審前程序的獨(dú)立地位——兼議審前程序的目的、任務(wù)與功能[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年05期

3 程兵;;論我國民事訴訟審前程序的完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年04期

4 ;最高人民法院第一審經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛案件適用普通程序開庭審理的若干規(guī)定[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報(bào);1994年01期

5 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于民事經(jīng)濟(jì)審判方式改革問題的若干規(guī)定[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報(bào);1998年03期

6 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于印發(fā)《人民法院五年改革綱要》的通知[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報(bào);1999年06期

7 馮玉軍;法律經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的理論前提[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2000年03期

8 楊曉迪;;合理建構(gòu)我國民事訴訟審前程序之比較研究[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年08期

9 占善剛;完善民事訴訟審前準(zhǔn)備程序之構(gòu)想[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年01期

10 趙澤君;;民事爭點(diǎn)整理程序的合理性基礎(chǔ)及其建構(gòu)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年02期

，

本文編號：2143492