本文選題：刑事被害人 + 訴訟參與度��； 參考：《山東大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事被害人作為犯罪活動的直接受害者以及刑事訴訟活動的參與主體之一,理應(yīng)受到全面的保護和公平的對待。但我國在司法實踐中對于刑事被害人的保護卻飽受詬病,刑事被害人無法真正的參與到訴訟活動中去、難以對于刑事訴訟活動產(chǎn)生實質(zhì)性影響,最重要的是難以在刑事訴訟活動中獲得足夠的物質(zhì)和精神賠償。為了解決這一問題,在世界范圍內(nèi)被害人學研究熱潮的影響之下,部分國內(nèi)學者提出,應(yīng)當在立法上賦予刑事被害人更加獨立的訴訟地位、更加廣泛和深層次的訴訟權(quán)利、以及更加完善的求償權(quán)。雖然這些思路不失為保護刑事被害人權(quán)利的有益嘗試,但是如果考慮到刑事訴訟活動作為一個有機整體的系統(tǒng)性與平衡性,就不難發(fā)現(xiàn),此類主張對于構(gòu)建公平合理的刑事訴訟環(huán)境毫無裨益。本文擬從以下六個方面對于我國刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問題進行簡要探討,并嘗試提出刑事被害人訴訟參與度理性化的基本思考。文章第一部分對于刑事被害人的含義以及訴訟參與度的含義進行了明晰,并提出了本文對"刑事被害人"概念的界定,為后文的寫作奠定了基礎(chǔ)。第二部分就刑事被害人保護問題的國內(nèi)研究現(xiàn)狀進行了簡要分析,介紹了部分主流觀點,并對這些觀點的合理性問題進行了探討。在第三部分中,筆者對于刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問題,分別選取了不同法系以及不同刑事訴訟模式的代表性國家,進行了比較法的研究,以期在先進的制度中汲取有益經(jīng)驗。第四部分,重點就部分學者提出的,關(guān)于強化刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問題的合理性和可行性進行了反思,并就被害人過度參與刑事訴訟可能造成的消極影響進行了簡要探討。第五部分,從刑事訴訟特點和原則、訴權(quán)問題、現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)定等方面,對于我國刑事被害人訴訟參與度進行了基本考量。第六部分,筆者提出了就刑事被害人訴訟參與度理性化問題的基本思考,主要是在堅持有限參與原則的基礎(chǔ)上,對于我國刑事訴訟活動進行相應(yīng)改造和完善,以保證現(xiàn)有規(guī)則的落地,同時輔之以社會化、多元化的矛盾解決機制,最終實現(xiàn)對于刑事被害人各項權(quán)益的全面保護。
[Abstract]:As a direct victim of criminal activities and one of the participants in criminal proceedings, criminal victims deserve comprehensive protection and fair treatment. However, in our judicial practice, the protection of criminal victims has been criticized, the criminal victims can not really participate in the proceedings, it is difficult to have a substantial impact on the criminal proceedings. Most importantly, it is difficult to obtain adequate material and moral compensation in criminal proceedings. In order to solve this problem, under the influence of the worldwide victimology research boom, some domestic scholars put forward that criminal victims should be given more independent litigation status and broader and deeper litigation rights in legislation. And a better claim. Although these ideas are useful attempts to protect the rights of criminal victims, it is not difficult to find that if we consider the systematic and balanced nature of criminal proceedings as an organic whole, Such claims are of no benefit to the establishment of a fair and reasonable environment for criminal proceedings. This paper briefly discusses the participation of criminal victims in litigation from the following six aspects, and tries to put forward the basic thinking of rationalizing the participation of criminal victims in proceedings. In the first part, the meaning of the criminal victim and the degree of participation in the proceedings are clarified, and the definition of the concept of "criminal victim" is put forward in this paper, which lays a foundation for the later writing. The second part briefly analyzes the domestic research status of criminal victim protection, introduces some mainstream views, and discusses the rationality of these views. In the third part, the author chooses the representative countries of different legal system and different criminal procedure mode to study the comparative law in order to learn useful experience from the advanced system. In the fourth part, the author mainly discusses the rationality and feasibility of strengthening the participation of criminal victims in criminal proceedings, and discusses the possible negative effects caused by the excessive participation of victims in criminal proceedings. The fifth part, from the criminal procedure characteristic and the principle, the lawsuit right question, the present legislation stipulation and so on, has carried on the basic consideration to our country criminal victim lawsuit participation degree. In the sixth part, the author puts forward the basic thinking on the rationality of criminal victim's participation in litigation, mainly on the basis of adhering to the principle of limited participation, and reforming and perfecting the criminal proceedings in our country accordingly. In order to ensure the landing of the existing rules, at the same time supplemented by a socialized, diversified conflict resolution mechanism, the ultimate realization of the overall protection of the rights and interests of criminal victims.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜永浩,石明磊;論刑事被害人的界定[J];湖北警官學院學報;2003年02期

2 竹林君;;比較法視野中的法律創(chuàng)新與借鑒——從如何救濟刑事被害人談起[J];人民檢察;2006年07期

3 榮月;;我國刑事被害人權(quán)利保障之初探[J];長春師范學院學報;2007年09期

4 朱文濤;張占彪;苗庭選;鄭淑敏;;有關(guān)刑事被害人救助問題的思考[J];中國檢察官;2008年11期

5 薛國駿;;刑事被害人救助制度研究[J];河北法學;2008年11期

6 陳彬;李昌林;;刑事被害人救濟制度應(yīng)分階段構(gòu)建[J];法制資訊;2009年03期

7 唐麗麗;;刑事被害人救助制度論略[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2009年06期

8 丁玉明;楊睿森;;我國刑事被害人司法救助制度研究[J];公民與法(法學版);2009年12期

9 黎光明;易志斌;;我國刑事被害人救助制度立法考量[J];湖南行政學院學報;2010年01期

10 趙麗;;刑事被害人救助制度價值初探[J];理論觀察;2010年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 丁英華;;刑事被害人救濟法律性質(zhì)辨析[A];中國犯罪學學會第十七屆學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2008年

2 潘弘;陸晶晶;;國外的刑事被害人救助制度研究[A];當代法學論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年

3 田鵬輝;;構(gòu)建我國刑事被害人社會保障制度之思考[A];中國犯罪學學會第十七屆學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2008年

4 王成玉;高s，

本文編號：2115180