本文選題：死因調(diào)查制度 + 死因調(diào)查程序��； 參考：《山東社會科學》2017年11期

【摘要】：我國現(xiàn)行的死因調(diào)查制度根據(jù)死亡事件發(fā)生的場合不同而區(qū)分為羈押場所內(nèi)的死因調(diào)查制度和羈押場所外的死因調(diào)查制度,二者雖然內(nèi)容有較大區(qū)別但都存在著調(diào)查主體不中立、調(diào)查方式單一、調(diào)查程序缺乏公開參與性以及調(diào)查結(jié)論難救濟等問題。這些問題在實踐中導(dǎo)致許多死亡事件因難以得到及時、正確處理而影響社會的和諧穩(wěn)定。為解決這些問題,我國應(yīng)建立統(tǒng)一的死因調(diào)查制度并設(shè)立相對獨立的死因調(diào)查程序,即將死因調(diào)查程序作為刑事訴訟的前置程序納入刑事訴訟法規(guī)定的特別程序之列,并實行調(diào)查主體與偵查主體的分離。
[Abstract]:The current death investigation system in our country is divided into the death investigation system in the custody place and the cause of death investigation system outside the detention place according to the situation of the death event. Although the content of the two is different, there are many problems, such as the main body of investigation is not neutral, the way of investigation is single, the procedure of investigation is not open and participatory, and the investigation conclusion is difficult to remedy. These problems lead to many death events which are difficult to deal with in time and affect the social harmony and stability. In order to solve these problems, China should establish a unified system of inquest and establish a relatively independent procedure for investigating the cause of death, that is, the procedure of investigating the cause of death should be included in the special procedure stipulated in the Code of Criminal procedure as the leading procedure of the criminal procedure. And carry out the separation of the subject of investigation and the subject of investigation.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學刑事法律科學研究院;
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 林勁松;;論羈押場所死因調(diào)查制度[J];浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版);2013年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 宋品怡;論我國死因裁判制度之構(gòu)建[D];湘潭大學;2016年

2 趙亞光;死因調(diào)查制度研究[D];北京交通大學;2017年

，

本文編號：2087103