本文選題：專(zhuān)家證人 + 法庭審判模式　； 參考：《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2013年04期

【摘要】：《國(guó)家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略綱要》明確提出要建立和完善專(zhuān)家證人訴訟制度。專(zhuān)家證人制度在各國(guó),尤其是英美法系國(guó)家證據(jù)法中是不可或缺的重要制度,對(duì)于解決技術(shù)事實(shí)爭(zhēng)議具有重要價(jià)值。近年來(lái),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判實(shí)踐一直在積極嘗試技術(shù)專(zhuān)家證人制度的適用。即根據(jù)現(xiàn)行司法解釋關(guān)于訴訟輔助人制度的規(guī)定,同時(shí)借鑒域外法的規(guī)定,探索當(dāng)事人聘請(qǐng)專(zhuān)家證人與法庭指定專(zhuān)家證人相結(jié)合的方式,協(xié)助法庭查明相關(guān)技術(shù)事實(shí)。有關(guān)專(zhuān)家證人適格性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、專(zhuān)家證人出庭方式、專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)可采性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及裁判文書(shū)表述等的相關(guān)研究,一方面滿(mǎn)足了解決技術(shù)事實(shí)認(rèn)定難的司法現(xiàn)實(shí)需求,另一方面也為專(zhuān)家證人制度的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展不斷積累了經(jīng)驗(yàn)。實(shí)踐證明,通過(guò)司法實(shí)踐不斷加強(qiáng)實(shí)際操作,總結(jié)、研究并提煉相應(yīng)規(guī)則,專(zhuān)家證人制度在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中完全可以與傳統(tǒng)司法技術(shù)鑒定制度并行存在并獲得發(fā)展。盡管專(zhuān)家證人制度的建立和完善困難重重,但穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:The outline of the National intellectual property Strategy clearly proposes to establish and perfect the expert witness litigation system. The expert witness system is an indispensable and important system in the evidence law of various countries, especially in the common law system, and has important value in resolving the dispute of technical facts. In recent years, intellectual property trial practice has been actively trying to apply the expert witness system. That is, according to the provisions of the current judicial interpretation of the system of litigation auxiliaries, at the same time, learn from the provisions of extraterritorial laws, explore the parties to hire expert witnesses and court appointed expert witnesses, to assist the court to find out the relevant technical facts. On the one hand, the relevant research on the standard of the suitability of expert witness, the mode of appearance of expert witness, the standard of admissibility of expert opinion and the expression of adjudicative documents, on the one hand, meets the judicial realistic demand of resolving the difficulty of finding technical facts. On the other hand, it also accumulates experience for the further development of expert witness system. Practice has proved that the expert witness system can exist and develop in parallel with the traditional judicial technology appraisal system in intellectual property litigation by continuously strengthening the practical operation, summarizing, studying and refining the corresponding rules through judicial practice. Although it is difficult to establish and perfect expert witness system, it is an inevitable trend of intellectual property trial to advance steadily.
【作者單位】： 江蘇省高級(jí)人民法院知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)庭;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1
，

本文編號(hào)：2077488