發(fā)布時間：2018-06-26 02:29

  本文選題：刑事證人 + 保護制度��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：正如著名的古老法律諺語所說：沒有證人就沒有訴訟。證人是刑事訴訟中十分重要的訴訟參與人,證人證言是刑事訴訟中關(guān)鍵的證據(jù)之一,對于確定偵查或調(diào)查方向、認定案件事實、完成訴訟任務(wù)、實現(xiàn)司法公正等方面都具有非常重要的作用。我國法律規(guī)定,凡是知道案件情況的人,都有作證的義務(wù)。 2012年修訂的《刑事訴訟法》加強了對刑事證人保護的力度,這是在刑事證人保護制度上很大進步。但是我們不得不承認,同域外證人保護制度較為完善的國家和地區(qū)相比我國的證人保護制度還存在很多不足之處。在現(xiàn)實生活中,刑事證人因作證被威脅、恐嚇甚至打擊報復(fù)的案件常有發(fā)生。因而,證人不愿意作證、不出庭作證等現(xiàn)象十分普遍。最高人民檢察院統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)顯示,刑事案件中有明確證人的超過80%,最后能出庭作證的卻不足5%。對此現(xiàn)狀,根本原因是我國的現(xiàn)行立法對證人及其親屬的人身安全和經(jīng)濟利益的保護乏力,證人的權(quán)利與義務(wù)嚴(yán)重失衡。因此,對刑事證人保護制度的再完善進行研究具有十分重要的意義。 本文首先對刑事訴訟證人保護制度的理論基礎(chǔ)及其價值進行論述；然后考察了域外國家和地區(qū)較為完善的刑事證人保護制度,并對其刑事證人保護制度的共性進行了研究；然后客觀的分析了當(dāng)前我國關(guān)于刑事證人保護方面的現(xiàn)狀,通過和域外較為完善的刑事證人保護制度進行比較,提出我國刑事證人保護制度方面存在的不足；最后筆者在借鑒吸收域外國家和地區(qū)成功的證人保護經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上,同時在充分認識我國基本國情和尊重傳統(tǒng)文化的前提下上,提出我國刑事證人保護制度再完善的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:As the famous old legal proverb says: no witnesses, no litigation. Witnesses are very important participants in criminal proceedings, witness testimony is one of the key evidence in criminal proceedings, to determine the direction of investigation or investigation, to determine the facts of the case, to complete the task of litigation, The realization of judicial justice and other aspects have a very important role. According to the law of our country, anyone who knows the situation of a case has the duty to testify. The revised Criminal procedure Law in 2012 has strengthened the protection of criminal witnesses, which is a great progress in the system of criminal witness protection. However, we have to admit that there are still many deficiencies in witness protection system in our country compared with the countries and regions where the extraterritorial witness protection system is more perfect. In real life, criminal witnesses are threatened, intimidated or even retaliated for testifying. As a result, witnesses do not want to testify, do not testify in court and other phenomena are very common. Statistics of the Supreme people's Procuratorate show that there are more than 80 clear witnesses in criminal cases, but less than 5 people can testify in court. The fundamental reason for this is that the current legislation of our country is weak in protecting the personal safety and economic interests of witnesses and their relatives, and the rights and obligations of witnesses are seriously out of balance. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the perfection of criminal witness protection system. This paper first discusses the theoretical basis and value of witness protection system in criminal procedure, then investigates the perfect criminal witness protection system in foreign countries and regions, and studies the commonness of the criminal witness protection system. Then it objectively analyzes the present situation of criminal witness protection in our country, compares it with the perfect criminal witness protection system outside the country, and points out the shortcomings of the criminal witness protection system in our country. Finally, on the basis of absorbing the successful witness protection experiences of foreign countries and regions, and fully understanding the basic conditions of our country and respecting the traditional culture, the author puts forward the idea of perfecting the criminal witness protection system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟傳香;;刑事證人保護制度研究[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年10期

2 李華 ,田華;質(zhì)疑強制證人出庭作證[J];中國司法;2003年10期

3 張茂泉;蓋啟云;;完善刑事證人作證制度——以證人的人身保護為視角[J];中國司法;2006年12期

4 張顯偉;證人保護制度初探[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2003年01期

5 李哲;詹琳玲;;完善我國的證人保護制度——以各國立法經(jīng)驗之比較借鑒為視角[J];法制與社會;2009年02期

6 傅賢國;喬瑜;;刑事證人保護問題探析[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

7 王少華;;新刑事訴訟法框架下的證人保護[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年05期

8 王保帥;;證人保護及證人補助制度研究[J];法制與社會;2013年03期

9 謝平;;關(guān)于新《刑事訴訟法》證人保護制度設(shè)計[J];公安教育;2012年08期

10 吳丹紅;證人保護制度探析[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

，

本文編號：2068659