本文選題：執(zhí)行和解 + 和解協議　； 參考：《江西財經大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行和解制度系我國民事執(zhí)行程序極為重要且極具特色的制度構成,執(zhí)行法院與當事人在強制執(zhí)行程序中都經常碰到執(zhí)行和解程序,顯然,執(zhí)行和解制度在執(zhí)行程序中占據了極為重要地位,其對強制執(zhí)行工作所展現出來的積極意義不可否認。在當前全國各級法院執(zhí)行實踐中,執(zhí)行和解制度能有效的緩和、化解了大部分進入強制執(zhí)行程序的矛盾,對執(zhí)行法院執(zhí)行案件案多人少,積案清理也具有積極明顯的作用,對基本解決執(zhí)行難起到了積極的推動作用,對構建和諧社會意義重大,同時也極大促進社會經濟健康有序發(fā)展。然而,我國市場經濟畢竟發(fā)展時間還比較短,規(guī)范經濟社會的相應規(guī)則還未十分完善,民訴法等法律法規(guī)和司法解釋對執(zhí)行和解方面內容的規(guī)定幾乎原則性,而對該方面內容具體規(guī)則進行規(guī)范很少,執(zhí)行法院或當事人在具體程序中經常無所適從,另外不論在制度理論還是具體操作方式上仍舊存在諸多不完善之處,與此同時,司法實踐過程中也無相關已實踐的理論可供參考,實踐操作模式全國執(zhí)行法院差異性較大,直接導致整個社會對民事執(zhí)行和解的誤解較深,認為民事執(zhí)行和解制度不具備明顯積極作用,徒有虛表,只見有損當事人權益,未見其他效應,詬病不少。為此,思考怎樣建立完善的理論框架貼合執(zhí)行和解實踐,并通過強制執(zhí)行工作實踐摸索出更加高效的制度模式,以促進民事執(zhí)行和解的制度功能在強制執(zhí)行程序中更加充分發(fā)揮,顯得迫在眉睫。筆者嘗試從民事執(zhí)行和解的概念、特點、性質、效力等涉及民事執(zhí)行和解理論的多角度,對不同類型的執(zhí)行和解予以簡要框定,探討執(zhí)行和解制度的現實意義。在對我國現行法律法規(guī)有關民事執(zhí)行和解條款進行分析的基礎上,分析了現行立法存在的問題以及其所造成的司法實踐困境,最后,從民訴法即相關法律解釋規(guī)范內容民事執(zhí)行和解予以考究,結合全國法院強制執(zhí)行工作實踐,探討如何科學確立執(zhí)行法院在此程序中所應發(fā)揮的積極功能,提出了相應的完善建議。
[Abstract]:The civil enforcement reconciliation system is a very important and characteristic system of civil enforcement procedure in China. The enforcement court and the parties often encounter the enforcement settlement procedure in the enforcement procedure. The enforcement and reconciliation system occupies an extremely important position in the execution procedure, and its positive significance to the enforcement work can not be denied. In the current implementation practice of courts at all levels throughout the country, the system of enforcement and reconciliation can be effectively alleviated, resolving most of the contradictions that have entered the enforcement procedure, and playing a positive and obvious role in the execution of more and less court cases, as well as in clearing up the backlog cases. It plays a positive role in solving the difficulties of implementation, and is of great significance to the construction of a harmonious society, and it also greatly promotes the healthy and orderly development of social economy. However, after all, the market economy in our country has been developing for a relatively short time, the corresponding rules for standardizing the economic and social sectors have not been very perfect, and the provisions of laws, regulations, and judicial interpretations such as the people's lawsuit Law on the implementation of reconciliation are almost principled. But to this aspect concrete rule carries on the norm very few, the execution court or the party often does not know what to do in the concrete procedure, in addition no matter in the system theory or the concrete operation way still has many imperfections, at the same time, There are no relevant practical theories for reference in the course of judicial practice. The practice mode of execution court in China is quite different, which directly leads to the deep misunderstanding of civil enforcement reconciliation in the whole society. It is considered that the civil enforcement reconciliation system has no obvious positive effect, but only a false representation, which only damages the rights and interests of the parties, and does not see any other effects. Therefore, we should consider how to establish a perfect theoretical framework for the implementation of reconciliation practice, and find out a more efficient system model through the practice of enforcement. In order to promote the civil enforcement reconciliation system function in the enforcement procedure more fully play, it is urgent. The author tries to briefly frame the different types of enforcement reconciliation from the concept, characteristics, nature and effectiveness of the civil enforcement reconciliation theory, and discusses the practical significance of the enforcement reconciliation system. On the basis of the analysis of the civil enforcement reconciliation clause of the current laws and regulations of our country, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the current legislation and the difficulties in judicial practice caused by it. Finally, From the angle of the civil enforcement reconciliation of the relevant legal interpretation, the author discusses how to scientifically establish the positive function that the executive court should play in this procedure, combined with the practice of enforcing the law in the whole country, and how to establish scientifically the positive function that the executive court should play in this procedure. The corresponding suggestions are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：江西財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 肖建國;;執(zhí)行程序修訂的價值共識與展望——兼評《民事訴訟法修正案》的相關條款[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年06期

2 徐小飛;;執(zhí)行和解中法院的職能和角色[J];法律適用;2012年10期

3 喬宇;;遲延履行執(zhí)行和解協議糾紛與執(zhí)行權的審查范圍[J];人民司法;2012年08期

4 栗崢;;中國民事執(zhí)行的當下境遇[J];政法論壇;2012年02期

5 李科;;論執(zhí)行和解協議之執(zhí)行力[J];政治與法律;2008年11期

6 湯維建;許尚豪;;論民事執(zhí)行程序的契約化━━以執(zhí)行和解為分析中心[J];政治與法律;2006年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 王利明;;和解協議形成獨立的合同關系[N];人民法院報;2002年

相關碩士學位論文 前7條

1 逄小溪;民事執(zhí)行和解制度之研究[D];中國政法大學;2014年

2 劉小書;論民事執(zhí)行和解[D];河南大學;2011年

3 王義祿;民事執(zhí)行和解制度實證調查研究[D];西南財經大學;2010年

4 郝曉東;我國民事執(zhí)行和解制度研究[D];內蒙古大學;2010年

5 黃璐;民事執(zhí)行和解制度研究[D];山東大學;2010年

6 徐國雄;民事執(zhí)行和解制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2010年

7 張永彬;論執(zhí)行和解[D];對外經濟貿易大學;2006年

，

本文編號：2003089