發(fā)布時間：2018-06-10 00:11

  本文選題：示范性訴訟 + 代表人訴訟��； 參考：《中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國的群體性糾紛正處于多發(fā)的趨勢，如何有效解決群體性糾紛一直是學(xué)界關(guān)注的熱點。根據(jù)民事訴訟法的相關(guān)規(guī)定，我國解決群體性糾紛的制度是代表人訴訟制度，但由于代表人訴訟制度的諸多缺陷，當(dāng)前基本上處于閑置狀態(tài)。 在國外，已有示范性訴訟的相關(guān)立法，我國近些年的司法實踐中也大量運用了類似于國外示范性訴訟的方式來解決群體性糾紛，但無論是實務(wù)界還是理論界，都沒有與示范性訴訟相關(guān)的系統(tǒng)研究，特別是如何構(gòu)建示范性訴訟程序。因此本文從群體性糾紛解決機制著手，具體分析、闡述了示范性訴訟在我國的表現(xiàn)形式、制度價值、構(gòu)成要件和具體的程序構(gòu)建。全文共分為五部分： 第一部分為群體性糾紛解決機制。該部分對大陸法系的德國和日本解決群體性糾紛的機制進(jìn)行了梳理，，并比較了德國示范性訴訟與日本選定當(dāng)事人制度，并對我國代表人訴訟制度的適用現(xiàn)狀、缺陷進(jìn)行了評價。 第二部分是示范性訴訟在我國司法實踐中的表現(xiàn)形式。示范性訴訟在我國司法實踐中具體表現(xiàn)為單獨立案，合并審理；單獨立案，分案審理；合并起訴，分案審理這三種形式。 第三部分是關(guān)于示范性訴訟的制度價值分析。概括了示范性訴訟的四大價值，即促進(jìn)訴訟效率的提高、發(fā)揮法的公益性功能，促進(jìn)糾紛的多元化解決以及彌補我國代表人訴訟制度的缺位。 在第四部分，筆者首次提出了示范性訴訟的要件。包括：案件的數(shù)量為10件及以上；具有共通的爭點；訴訟標(biāo)的為同一種類。另外指出具有共同的被告并非示范性訴訟的要件。 第五部分為示范性訴訟的程序構(gòu)建。具體的示范性訴訟包括三個階段，即示范性案件的產(chǎn)生階段，這一階段包括示范性訴訟的啟動、管轄、公告、登記、示范性案件的遴選等程序；示范性案件的續(xù)行階段，包括示范性訴訟的審前準(zhǔn)備程序、示范原告的權(quán)利及限制、參與登記權(quán)利人的權(quán)益保障、示范性訴訟的審理程序及示范性訴訟費用的負(fù)擔(dān)；第三階段是示范判決效力的擴張階段。
[Abstract]:At present, the group disputes in our country are in the trend of frequent, how to effectively solve the group disputes has been a hot spot of academic attention. According to the relevant provisions of the Civil procedure Law, the system of resolving group disputes in our country is the representative litigation system, but because of the defects of the representative litigation system, it is basically idle at present. There has been legislation on model litigation, and in our judicial practice in recent years, a large number of methods similar to those of foreign exemplary litigation have been used to solve group disputes, but no matter in practice or in theory, There is no systematic research on the model litigation, especially how to construct the model litigation procedure. Therefore, this paper starts with the mechanism of resolving group disputes, analyzes concretely the manifestation, system value, constitutive elements and concrete procedure construction of model litigation in our country. The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is group dispute resolution mechanism. This part combs the mechanism of solving group disputes between Germany and Japan in the continental law system, and compares the model litigation in Germany with the system of selected parties in Japan, and the current situation of the application of representative litigation system in China. The second part is the manifestation of model litigation in our judicial practice. In the judicial practice of our country, the demonstration litigation is embodied in the following three forms: separate case filing, joint trial; separate case filing; joint prosecution; case divided trial. The third part is the analysis of the system value of the model action. This paper summarizes the four values of exemplary litigation, that is, promoting the improvement of litigation efficiency, giving play to the public welfare function of law, promoting the diversification of dispute resolution and making up for the absence of representative litigation system in our country. For the first time, the author puts forward the elements of exemplary litigation. Including: the number of cases and more than 10; has a common point of contention; the subject matter of the same kind of litigation. In addition, the author points out that a common defendant is not an important element of model litigation. The fifth part is the procedure construction of model litigation. The concrete demonstration lawsuit includes three stages, that is, the generation stage of the demonstration case, which includes the procedure of starting the model lawsuit, jurisdiction, announcement, registration, selection of the model case, and the continuation stage of the model case. Including the pre-trial preparation procedure of the model litigation, the rights and limitations of the demonstration plaintiff, the protection of the rights and interests of the registered right holder, the trial procedure of the model lawsuit and the burden of the expenses of the demonstration lawsuit; The third stage is the expansion of the validity of the model judgment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉學(xué)在;;團體訴訟制度概念辨析[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期

2 肖建國;謝俊;;示范性訴訟及其類型化研究——以美國、英國、德國為對象的比較法考察[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

3 吳澤勇;;集團訴訟在德國:“異類”抑或“藍(lán)本”?[J];法學(xué)家;2009年06期

4 楊嚴(yán)炎;;示范訴訟的分析與借鑒[J];法學(xué);2007年03期

5 章武生;楊嚴(yán)炎;;我國群體訴訟的立法與司法實踐[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年02期

6 徐卉;;民事訴訟法學(xué)研究的知識轉(zhuǎn)型[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年05期

7 唐力;;論協(xié)商性司法的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年06期

8 冷羅生;;名古屋新干線公害訴訟[J];中國審判;2008年07期

9 齊樹潔;徐雁;;群體訴訟的困境與出路:示范訴訟制度的建構(gòu)[J];中州學(xué)刊;2009年01期

本文編號：2001310