本文選題：專家輔助人 + 訴訟地位　； 參考：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科學技術的日新月異,現(xiàn)代訴訟中涉及的專門性問題也與日俱增,訴訟當事人以及法官都會受到自身知識的局限,在面對這些專業(yè)性問題時顯得束手無策從而難以作出正確的判斷。為了解決這一問題,“專家”制度應運而生。目前在國際上相對成熟的專家制度主要是英美法系的專家證人制度、意大利的技術顧問制度以及日本和臺灣地區(qū)訴訟輔助人制度。我國立法在不斷總結、不斷探索的基礎上,依據(jù)基本國情立足現(xiàn)有法制體系創(chuàng)設了專家輔助人制度�！皩＜逸o助人”這個概念并非法條直接規(guī)定,無論是我國民事訴訟法還是2015年最高院出臺的民訴法解釋都只是規(guī)定了 “有專門知識的人”,法學理論界和實務界將這種主要在訴訟中解決專門性問題的具有專門知識、技能或者經驗的人稱為“專家輔助人”。與證人、鑒定人和訴訟代理人等不同,專家輔助人是一類特殊的主體,旨在彌補法官、當事人因受自身知識的限制而不能對案件中的專業(yè)問題作出準確把握和判斷。我國現(xiàn)行立法對該項制度的規(guī)定寥寥幾個法條,無不增加其在司法實踐中的操作難度,阻礙其應有功能的實現(xiàn)。因此,發(fā)展和完善我國現(xiàn)行專家輔助人制度任務緊迫。本文主要有以下四個部分。第一部分是基礎理論部分,該部分通過對專家輔助人和幾類相似概念的對比來理清概念,從而提煉出該制度的重要意義。第二部分對域外幾種專家制度進行了考察和研究,雖然存在國情和訴訟模式等方面的諸多不同,但是仍然可以借鑒其先進的制度設計,總結出各個制度對我國專家輔助人制度的啟示。第三部分總結了我國當前立法對專家輔助人制度的規(guī)定,并結合司法實踐,提出目前該制度存在的訴訟地位不明確、參訴程序模糊等五個較為嚴重的問題。第四部分是本文的重點章節(jié),筆者針對第三部分提出的問題——嘗試進行解決,并大膽提出進行程序上具體設定的建議,以期對我國建立更加系統(tǒng)、更加完善的專家輔助人制度作出些許貢獻。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, the specialized problems involved in modern litigation are also increasing, the litigants and judges will be limited by their own knowledge. In the face of these professional problems appear helpless and difficult to make a correct judgment. In order to solve this problem, the "expert" system came into being. At present, the relatively mature expert system in the world is mainly the expert witness system in Anglo-American law system, the technical adviser system in Italy and the litigation assistant system in Japan and Taiwan. On the basis of summing up and exploring, our legislation has established the expert assistant system according to the basic national conditions and the existing legal system. The concept of "expert assistant" is not directly stipulated by the law. Whether it is the civil procedure law of our country or the interpretation of the civil action law issued by the Supreme Court in 2015, it only stipulates "the person with special knowledge." Legal theorists and practitioners refer to this kind of people with specialized knowledge, skills or experience as "expert auxiliaries", who mainly solve specialized problems in litigation. Different from witness, expert assistant and ad litem agent, expert assistant is a kind of special subject, which aims to make up for the judge, because the parties are limited by their own knowledge, they can not accurately grasp and judge the professional problems in the case. There are only a few regulations in the current legislation of our country, all of which increase the difficulty of its operation in judicial practice and hinder the realization of its proper function. Therefore, it is urgent to develop and perfect the current expert assistant system in our country. This paper mainly has the following four parts. The first part is the basic theory part, this part clarifies the concept by comparing the expert assistant person and several similar concepts, thus abstracts the important meaning of the system. The second part has carried on the investigation and the research to the extraterritorial several kinds of expert system. Although there are many differences in the aspects of national conditions and litigation modes, it can still draw lessons from its advanced system design. Summed up each system to our country expert assistant system enlightenment. The third part summarizes the provisions of the current legislation of our country on the expert assistant system, and combined with judicial practice, puts forward five more serious problems, such as unclear litigation status and vague procedure. The fourth part is the key chapter of this paper. The author tries to solve the problems raised in the third part, and boldly puts forward some specific suggestions on the procedure, in order to establish a more systematic system for our country. More perfect expert assistant person system makes a little contribution.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐勝萍;張雪花;;論民事訴訟專家輔助人制度的完善[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2016年03期

2 郭華;;對抗抑或證據(jù):專家輔助人功能的重新審視——兼論最高法院審理“奇虎360訴騰訊”案[J];證據(jù)科學;2016年02期

3 蔣朋軍;;芻議我國民事訴訟中的專家輔助人制度[J];法制博覽;2016年10期

4 畢玉謙;;辨識與解析:民事訴訟專家輔助人制度定位的經緯范疇[J];比較法研究;2016年02期

5 洪冬英;;以審判為中心制度下的專家輔助人制度研究——以民事訴訟為視角[J];中國司法鑒定;2015年06期

6 岳軍要;;專家輔助人出庭及專家意見的采信規(guī)則[J];鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2015年05期

7 林鈺;;專家輔助人出庭制度研究[J];法制博覽;2015年23期

8 呂中偉;;我國專家輔助人制度之完善[J];河南財經政法大學學報;2015年02期

9 李學軍;朱夢妮;;專家輔助人制度研析[J];法學家;2015年01期

10 李瑞欽;;民事訴訟專家輔助人的法律定位與制度優(yōu)化[J];人民司法;2014年21期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 高e，

本文編號：1929207