本文選題：認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度 + 刑事速裁程序　； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2017年08期

【摘要】：2014年6月,全國人大授權(quán)兩高開展了刑事速裁程序的試點(diǎn),2016年9月,全國人大又授權(quán)兩高開展了認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度的試點(diǎn)。認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度與刑事速裁程序都是國家為了解決輕微刑事案件逐年上升的問題,兼顧司法效率與司法公正,所作出的制度選擇。通過對認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行界定,進(jìn)而對認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度的邊界進(jìn)行論證,最終對比了認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰程序與刑事速裁程序的異同,明確了二者的關(guān)系。內(nèi)涵和邊界是一切制度研究的邏輯起點(diǎn),認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰制度需要從它的內(nèi)涵和邊界上正確界定,以指導(dǎo)司法實(shí)踐的運(yùn)行,并促進(jìn)制度的完善。
[Abstract]:In June 2014, the National People's Congress authorized two high schools to carry out the pilot of the criminal procedure. In September 2016, the National People's Congress authorized two high schools to carry out the pilot of the plea punishment and leniency system. The plea punishment leniency system and the criminal procedure are all the problems of the state in order to solve the slight criminal cases rising year by year, and take into account the judicial efficiency and judicial justice. Through the definition of the connotations of the plea leniency system and the boundary of the plea leniency system, the differences and similarities between the confession and punishment procedure and the criminal procedure are contrasted, and the relationship between the two is clarified. The connotation and boundary are the logical starting points of the study of all systems, and the system of confession and punishment is required. We should correctly define its connotation and boundary so as to guide the operation of judicial practice and promote the perfection of the system.
【作者單位】： 黑龍江大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“中國革命法制‘從農(nóng)村到城市’的重大轉(zhuǎn)折研究”(12BFX021)
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1927145