本文選題：違法所得 + 沒(méi)收程序　； 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為世界上第一部指導(dǎo)國(guó)際反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)的法律文件，《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》的通過(guò)對(duì)各國(guó)加強(qiáng)國(guó)內(nèi)的反腐行動(dòng)、提高反腐成效、促進(jìn)反腐敗國(guó)際合作具有重要的意義。尤其是該《公約》第五章“資產(chǎn)的追回機(jī)制”中明確規(guī)定了沒(méi)收腐敗犯罪所得制度。該程序的設(shè)置不僅解決了在犯罪人嫌疑人、被告人在死亡、潛逃或者缺席而無(wú)法對(duì)其起訴的情形下，能夠不經(jīng)刑事定罪而沒(méi)收腐敗犯罪所得，最大限度的追回腐敗犯罪所得的問(wèn)題，而且該制度的設(shè)置還順應(yīng)了當(dāng)前國(guó)際社會(huì)反腐、反恐的形勢(shì)，為各國(guó)追回腐敗犯罪所得提供了依據(jù)。 中國(guó)作為《公約》的締約國(guó)，基于《公約》的規(guī)定，在2012年新修訂的《刑事訴訟法》中增設(shè)了“違法所得特別沒(méi)收程序”。該程序的設(shè)置順應(yīng)了當(dāng)前國(guó)際、國(guó)內(nèi)反腐、反恐的形勢(shì)，是完善中國(guó)刑事訴訟法律體系，履行《公約》基本義務(wù)的要求。同時(shí)，該程序的設(shè)置兼顧了嚴(yán)懲和預(yù)防的雙重價(jià)值取向，體現(xiàn)了尊重和保障人權(quán)、對(duì)司法公正和效率的價(jià)值追求。此外，該程序就其程序的核心內(nèi)容而言，程序適用的范圍、特別的訴訟性質(zhì)、特別的訴訟程序等方面都體現(xiàn)了《公約》的基本精神和相關(guān)規(guī)定。當(dāng)然，中國(guó)違法所得沒(méi)收程序在一些制度方面還和《公約》存在差距。因此，有必要參照《公約》的規(guī)定，，明確沒(méi)收對(duì)象的范圍、明確程序的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和舉證責(zé)任，明確司法協(xié)助的問(wèn)題等制度方面的規(guī)定，以便更好的履行《公約》的義務(wù)，早日實(shí)現(xiàn)與《公約》的全面對(duì)接。
[Abstract]:As the world's first legal document to guide the international fight against corruption, the adoption of the United Nations Convention against Corruption is of great significance to all countries in strengthening domestic anti-corruption actions, improving the effectiveness of anti-corruption, and promoting international cooperation against corruption.In particular, Chapter V of the Convention, "Asset recovery mechanisms", explicitly provides for the confiscation of proceeds of corruption offences.The procedure not only solves the problem of confiscating the proceeds of corruption without criminal conviction, but also in the case of a criminal suspect, an accused person who dies, absconds or is unable to prosecute him in absentia.The maximum recovery of the proceeds of corruption crime, and the establishment of the system also conforms to the current international anti-corruption, anti-terrorism situation, for countries to recover the proceeds of corruption crime provides a basis.As a State party to the Convention, China, in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, has added the "Special confiscation procedure for illegal proceeds" in the newly amended Criminal procedure Law in 2012.The establishment of this procedure conforms to the current international and domestic situation of anti-corruption and anti-terrorism. It is the requirement of perfecting China's criminal procedure legal system and fulfilling the basic obligations of the Convention.At the same time, the establishment of the procedure takes into account the dual value orientation of severe punishment and prevention, and embodies the value pursuit of respecting and protecting human rights and of judicial justice and efficiency.In addition, as far as the core content of the procedure is concerned, the scope of application of the procedure, the nature of the proceedings in particular, and the special procedure all embody the basic spirit and relevant provisions of the Convention.Of course, the procedure of confiscation of illegal income in China is still different from the Convention in some systems.Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the scope of the object of confiscation, the standard of proof and the burden of proof of the procedure, and the provisions of the system, such as the question of mutual legal assistance, in order to better fulfil the obligations of the Convention, taking into account the provisions of the Convention,To realize the comprehensive docking with the Convention at an early date.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 袁益波;刑法中沒(méi)收物之分類研究[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

本文編號(hào)：1763124