本文選題：結構功能 + 家事糾紛　； 參考：《重慶工商大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭是社會生活的基本單位,家庭矛盾的處理關系到家庭的穩(wěn)固,家和才能萬事興,家庭和諧與社會的協(xié)調發(fā)展息息相關。家事糾紛解決機制作為獨立完整的一個社會系統(tǒng),其結構的優(yōu)化、功能的實現都需要一個基礎理論保駕護航,結構功能理論下構建家事糾紛解決機制,能夠實現社會資源整合,迎合家庭糾紛處理的特殊性,平和中化解矛盾,保溫家人之間情感,恢復家庭和氣,保障社會安定。對糾紛解決機制的研究離不開社會背景環(huán)境,家事糾紛解決機制的變遷脫離不開社會宏觀結構的影響。長期的改革開放與市場經濟,促使中國的經濟結構、政治體制不斷變革,多種矛盾交織涌現,社會紊亂成分增加不絕,糾紛解決機制作為處理糾紛、維護社會穩(wěn)定的最后一道屏障,在新的時期應被政府納入綜合治理的構架之下。近年學者普遍關注糾紛解決機制的微觀層面,如對個案調解及其調解模式、民間法與習慣法同國家法的關系等方面的研究,這些研究對構建我國新時期的糾紛解決機制有著不可藐覷的作用,但它們不免有些忽視宏觀層面的研究,要知道事物一切的外部表象均與其內在深層結構存在千絲萬縷的聯(lián)系,所以本文正是從深層的社會結構開啟研究,將視角著力在宏觀層面。本文主要通過分析結構功能理論(主要指帕森斯時代)的基本內容和家事糾紛的基礎理論入手,推演出家事糾紛解決機制構建的理論依據,分析我國家事糾紛獨有的特點,總結出家事糾紛解決機制構建的社會實踐依據。指出我國現有家事糾紛解決機制的問題,通過借鑒澳大利亞、德國等國家在處理家事糾紛方面的先進做法,結合結構功能理論的指導,探求我國家事糾紛解決機制的構建。本文通過文獻研究,分析結構功能理論的基本內容和核心觀點,為家事糾紛解決機制的構建提供具有理論意義的指導。通過邏輯分析法分析家事糾紛與其他民事糾紛的不同,結合我國現有家事糾紛處理機制的現狀,提出具有針對性的完善意見。通過對澳大利亞、美國、德國等發(fā)達國家現有家事糾紛處理機制的研究,結合我國傳統(tǒng)文化和新時期的價值觀,提出構建我國家事糾紛解決機制的理論架構和部分實務改進措施。
[Abstract]:Family is the basic unit of social life. The settlement of family contradictions is closely related to the stability of family, family harmony and the harmonious development of society.As an independent and complete social system, the family dispute resolution mechanism needs a basic theory to guarantee the optimization of its structure and function. The construction of family dispute resolution mechanism under structure-function theory can realize the integration of social resources.It caters to the particularity of the family dispute resolution, resolves the contradiction in peace, preserves the emotion between the family and the family, recovers the family harmony and ensures the social stability.The research on the dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the social background environment, and the change of the family dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the influence of the macro structure of the society.The long-term reform and opening up and the market economy have prompted China's economic structure, political system to constantly change, a variety of contradictions intertwined and emerging, and the elements of social disorder have been increasing. The dispute resolution mechanism serves as a dispute resolution mechanism.The last barrier to social stability should be brought under the framework of comprehensive management in the new period.In recent years, scholars have generally paid attention to the micro level of dispute resolution mechanism, such as the case mediation and its mediation model, the relationship between folk law and customary law and national law, and so on.These studies play an important role in constructing the dispute resolution mechanism in the new period of our country, but they can't help but ignore the macro-level research. We should know that all external appearances of things are inextricably related to their inner and deep structure.Therefore, this paper starts the research from the deep social structure and focuses on the macro level.By analyzing the basic contents of the theory of structure and function (mainly referring to the Parsons era) and the basic theory of family disputes, this paper deduces the theoretical basis for the construction of the settlement mechanism of family disputes, and analyzes the unique characteristics of family disputes in our country.Summarizes the social practice basis for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper points out the problems of the existing family dispute resolution mechanism in our country, and probes into the construction of the family dispute resolution mechanism of our country by referring to the advanced practices of Australia, Germany and other countries in dealing with the family dispute, combined with the guidance of the theory of structure and function.Through literature research, this paper analyzes the basic contents and core viewpoints of structural function theory, and provides theoretical guidance for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper analyzes the differences between family disputes and other civil disputes by means of logical analysis. Combined with the present situation of domestic dispute handling mechanism in China, the author puts forward some suggestions for perfection.Through the research on the existing mechanism of handling family disputes in developed countries such as Australia, the United States, Germany, and other developed countries, combining the traditional culture of our country and the values of the new era,This paper puts forward the theoretical framework and some practical improvement measures of the family dispute resolution mechanism in China.
【學位授予單位】：重慶工商大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 曹思婕;;我國家事審判改革路徑之探析[J];法學論壇;2016年05期

2 孫馮英;;糾紛解決中ADR思路的法理依據及其合理性分析[J];湖北經濟學院學報(人文社會科學版);2016年01期

3 熊金才;;論婚姻家庭法立法價值取向的多元化——以法社會學為視角[J];中華女子學院學報;2015年06期

4 戴凌玉;;英美ADR糾紛解決機制的設立背景[J];法制博覽;2015年23期

5 歐偉明;季如莉;;鄉(xiāng)村社會結構變遷與民事糾紛解決路徑選擇[J];法制與社會;2015年15期

6 羅漂;;家事糾紛ADR機制的構建[J];韶關學院學報;2015年05期

7 蔣月;馮源;;臺灣家事審判制度的改革及其啟示——以“家事事件法”為中心[J];廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2014年05期

8 許少波;;家事糾紛類型化分析[J];江海學刊;2014年03期

9 董玉鵬;;結構功能理論下涉外知識產權糾紛訴調對接機制研究[J];知識產權;2013年06期

10 范愉;;訴訟社會與無訟社會的辨析和啟示——糾紛解決機制中的國家與社會[J];法學家;2013年01期

相關博士學位論文 前3條

1 曾學智;社會學視野下的法治研究[D];武漢大學;2010年

2 來文彬;家事調解制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2010年

3 宋明;人民調解糾紛解決機制的法社會學研究[D];吉林大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 易可;我國家事糾紛解決機制的完善[D];湘潭大學;2013年

2 常曉茗;傳統(tǒng)家庭分工與現代社會參與的對立：女性角色內沖突[D];南京農業(yè)大學;2008年

3 孟慧;家事糾紛解決機制研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年

4 李s，

本文編號：1761098