本文選題：無(wú)條件選擇性沖突規(guī)范 + 連結(jié)點(diǎn)　； 參考：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年04期

【摘要】：我國(guó)《法律適用法》中共有9條無(wú)條件選擇性沖突規(guī)范,根據(jù)法官選擇方式的不同,可以分為法官被動(dòng)選擇的沖突規(guī)范和法官主動(dòng)選擇的沖突規(guī)范。前者的功能在于維護(hù)和促進(jìn)某種法律關(guān)系的成立;后者的功能在于確保法律選擇的靈活性以實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)案公正。我國(guó)法院對(duì)此類(lèi)沖突規(guī)范的適用存在著說(shuō)理不清、選擇連結(jié)點(diǎn)的依據(jù)不明等問(wèn)題。在司法實(shí)踐中,對(duì)于法官被動(dòng)選擇的沖突規(guī)范,法官可以逐一、直接適用連結(jié)點(diǎn)指向的實(shí)體法對(duì)爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題的有效性進(jìn)行判斷,只要有一個(gè)連結(jié)點(diǎn)指向的實(shí)體法認(rèn)可其有效性,就應(yīng)認(rèn)定為有效;對(duì)于法官主動(dòng)選擇的沖突規(guī)范,法官應(yīng)當(dāng)考量個(gè)案中的實(shí)體正義和公共政策來(lái)選擇應(yīng)當(dāng)適用的連結(jié)點(diǎn),并在判決書(shū)中對(duì)選擇連結(jié)點(diǎn)的理由做出說(shuō)明,不能完全無(wú)條件地自由裁量;對(duì)于主客觀連結(jié)點(diǎn)并列的沖突規(guī)范,法官應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)該規(guī)則的立法目的,按照司法任務(wù)簡(jiǎn)單化的要求,優(yōu)先根據(jù)客觀連結(jié)點(diǎn)選擇準(zhǔn)據(jù)法。
[Abstract]:There are nine rules of unconditional selective conflict in our Law of Application of Law, which can be divided into the conflict norms of passive choice of judges and the conflict norms of active choice of judges according to the different ways of selecting judges.The function of the former is to maintain and promote the establishment of a certain legal relationship, while the latter is to ensure the flexibility of the choice of law in order to realize the justice of the case.There are some problems in the application of this kind of conflict norms in Chinese courts, such as unclear reasoning and unclear basis for selecting the connecting points.In judicial practice, the judge can judge the validity of the dispute directly by applying the substantive law pointing to the connecting point one by one, as long as there is a substantive law pointing at the connecting point to confirm the validity of the conflict norm of the passive choice of the judge.Should be considered valid; in the case of conflict norms of active choice of judges, the judge should consider substantive justice and public policy in the individual case to select the points of connection to which they should apply and, in the judgement, to explain the reasons for the choice of the link points,The judge should choose the applicable law according to the legislative purpose of the rule, according to the simple request of judicial task, according to the objective link point.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)國(guó)際法研究所;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1757472