本文選題：偵查　切入點(diǎn)：強(qiáng)制措施　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：強(qiáng)制性偵查措施與任意性偵查措施相對(duì)，意指?jìng)刹闄C(jī)關(guān)為搜集犯罪證據(jù)和查獲犯罪嫌疑人而對(duì)相對(duì)人采取的強(qiáng)制性偵查行為，包括了我國(guó)刑事訴訟法上規(guī)定的強(qiáng)制措施和具有強(qiáng)制性的查明案件事實(shí)、搜集、保全證據(jù)的偵查行為。鑒于強(qiáng)制措施成為獨(dú)立的研究對(duì)象，多年來已較為廣泛深入的研究，本課題將重點(diǎn)研究強(qiáng)制措施以外尚未深入研究的其他強(qiáng)制性偵查措施的監(jiān)督問題。由于這些強(qiáng)制性偵查措施是對(duì)公民相關(guān)權(quán)利的限制或剝奪，在實(shí)踐中一旦濫用就容易導(dǎo)致侵害公民合法權(quán)益，必須予以監(jiān)督制約。強(qiáng)制性偵查措施具有強(qiáng)制性、易侵權(quán)性、適用的嚴(yán)格性等基本特征，其種類，依據(jù)針對(duì)的客體不同可分為對(duì)人身體的強(qiáng)制性措施、對(duì)物的強(qiáng)制性措施、對(duì)穩(wěn)私權(quán)的強(qiáng)制性措施；依據(jù)適用范圍可分為普通偵查措施和特殊偵查措施，前者指?jìng)刹楦鞣N犯罪均可適用的偵查措施，后者指只能在偵查符合一定種類或條件的犯罪時(shí)方可適用的措施。雖然強(qiáng)制性偵查措施存在侵犯公民基本權(quán)益的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，但從懲罰犯罪、維護(hù)社會(huì)秩序、被害人人權(quán)保障以及實(shí)施犯罪行為的嫌疑人需有一定忍受強(qiáng)制措施和刑罰的義務(wù)的角度來看，強(qiáng)制性偵查措施有其正當(dāng)性。強(qiáng)制性偵查措施在嚴(yán)格遵循法定原則、比例原則、審查原則等相關(guān)的制度規(guī)定和程序情況下實(shí)施，其功能和意義就不言而喻，能保障訴訟順利進(jìn)行，提高偵查效率，有效懲治犯罪，，預(yù)防繼續(xù)犯罪，降低損害后果，懲戒教育罪犯和其他公民。
[Abstract]:The opposite of compulsory investigative measures and arbitrary investigative measures, which refers to the compulsory investigative actions taken by the investigative organs against the relative parties in order to collect criminal evidence and seize criminal suspects, Including the compulsory measures stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law of our country and the investigation behavior of finding out the facts of the case, collecting and preserving the evidence. In view of the fact that the coercive measures have become independent research objects, they have been studied extensively and deeply for many years. This topic will focus on the supervision of other coercive investigative measures other than coercive measures that have not yet been studied in depth. Since these coercive investigative measures are restrictions or deprivation of citizens' relevant rights, Once abused in practice, it is easy to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, and it must be supervised and restricted. According to the different objects, it can be divided into compulsory measures on human body, coercive measures on objects, coercive measures on stabilizing private rights, and general investigative measures and special investigative measures on the basis of the scope of application. The former refers to the investigative measures applicable to the investigation of crimes of all kinds, while the latter refers to the measures that can be applied only when the investigation of crimes of a certain type or condition meets certain conditions. Although compulsory investigative measures have the potential risk of infringing upon the basic rights and interests of citizens, But from the point of view of punishing crimes, maintaining social order, protecting the human rights of victims and the obligations of suspects who commit criminal acts to bear certain coercive measures and penalties, Coercive investigative measures have their legitimacy. The function and significance of compulsory investigative measures are self-evident when they are strictly implemented in accordance with the relevant system and procedures, such as the legal principle, the principle of proportionality, the principle of examination, etc. It can guarantee the smooth progress of the lawsuit, improve the efficiency of investigation, punish crime effectively, prevent the continuing crime, reduce the damage consequence, punish and educate the criminals and other citizens.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 樊崇義,張中;權(quán)利保障與權(quán)力制衡——我國(guó)刑事審前程序改革的基本思路[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年01期

2 萬毅;偵查行為分類研究——以毒品犯罪的偵查為范例[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

3 韓姍姍;黎萍;;影響公訴活動(dòng)的偵查缺陷問題——以退回補(bǔ)充偵查為視角[J];今日南國(guó)(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年11期

4 汪建成,吳江;偵查權(quán)的法理分析[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

5 孫長(zhǎng)永;強(qiáng)制偵查的法律控制與司法審查[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年05期

6 張衛(wèi)平;絕對(duì)職權(quán)主義的理性認(rèn)知──原蘇聯(lián)民事訴訟基本模式評(píng)析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1996年04期

7 毛立新;;論我國(guó)偵查理念及其法治化[J];政法學(xué)刊;2006年05期

8 朱孝清;;職務(wù)犯罪偵查措施研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年01期

本文編號(hào)：1691773