發(fā)布時間：2018-03-23 11:45

  本文選題：警察行政　切入點：即時強制措施　出處：《廣西民族大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：警察行政即時強制措施是行政強制研究領域一個重要組成部分。由于其權力設置上的行政性、緊急性和侵犯性，一旦行使不當，容易對公民基本人權造成重大威脅。然而，令人遺憾的是，中華人民共和國行政強制法（以下簡稱《行政強制法》）中并沒有對于行政即時強制進行規(guī)定。時至今日，在我國對于即時強制措施仍然缺乏統(tǒng)一的立法。有關警察行政即時強制的法律依據(jù)，僅能散見于《人民警察法》等單行的法律法規(guī)中，因此導致我國的行政即時強制措施的執(zhí)行約束體系不夠系統(tǒng)，有待細化。此外，目前關于公安警察部門法中警察行政即時強制措施的研究并不夠深入，在實踐中仍然存在很多問題。諸如因警察行政即時強制措施行使不當致使公民的自由、權利、財產(chǎn)被侵害的事件，頻頻發(fā)生。因此，在建立以保障人的基本權利和自由為目標的法治國家過程中，我們必須對警察行政即時強制措施在行政法學研究中予以重視，以期能為實現(xiàn)嚴格規(guī)制警察行政即時強制措施的行使，防止其濫用，從而更好地保障公共安全和社會秩序，保障行政相對人的合法權益的目標提供理論支持。 本文共分引言、正文和結語三個部分，正文包括以下四部分： 第一部分著重于闡述有關警察行政即時強制措施的基礎理論。本文從界定警察行政、即時強制、警察行政即時強制措施的等概念入手，分析了我國警察行政即時強制措施的特征、種類及法律依據(jù)。該部分構成了本文探討警察行政即時強制措施及其適用與完善的基礎和邏輯起點。 第二部分對域外和我國臺灣地區(qū)警察行政即時強制措施的制度進行了對比考察。通過對德國、日本、韓國和我國臺灣地區(qū)即時強制措施的制度分析，本文總結了法治相對先行國家和地區(qū)警察行政即時強制措施的成功經(jīng)驗，包括警察行政即時強制措施細致入微，強制措施的種類齊全和高度注重人權的保障措施。 第三部分用于分析我國警察行政即時強制措施中現(xiàn)存的問題,譬如立法不完善、執(zhí)法主體良莠不齊、違法責任追究機制不健全等等。 第四部分則著筆于探討警察行政即時強制的司法審查中應該注意的問題。在此部分，本文主要圍繞著如何進行合理性審查、舉證上的特殊要求、復議前置、起訴期限、行政復議、行政訴訟、特別損失補償?shù)确矫鎭碚归_論述。 簡而言之，為確保警察行政即時強制措施在其行使中實現(xiàn)有法可依、有法必依、執(zhí)法必嚴、違法必究，我國需要不斷改進強化現(xiàn)有的司法審查體系，，從而更好的保障行政相對人的合法權益，并推動我國法制建設的進程。
[Abstract]:The police administrative immediate coercive measures are an important part of the research field of administrative compulsion. Due to the administrative, urgent and intrusive nature of its power establishment, it is easy to pose a serious threat to the basic human rights of citizens once it is improperly exercised. It is regrettable that the Administrative compulsory Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Administrative compulsory Law) does not provide for immediate administrative coercion. In China, there is still a lack of uniform legislation on immediate coercive measures. The legal basis for the immediate enforcement of police administration can only be found in separate laws and regulations such as the people's Police Law. As a result, the enforcement constraint system of administrative immediate coercive measures in our country is not systematic enough and needs to be refined. In addition, the current research on the police administrative immediate coercive measures in the Public Security Police Department Law is not deep enough. There are still many problems in practice, such as the frequent violation of citizens' freedom, rights and property as a result of improper enforcement of the police's immediate administrative coercive measures. In the process of establishing a country under the rule of law with the goal of safeguarding the fundamental rights and freedoms of human beings, we must attach importance to the immediate coercive measures of police administration in the study of administrative jurisprudence. In order to achieve strict regulation of the exercise of police administrative immediate coercive measures, prevent their abuse, and thus better protect public security and social order, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterpart to provide theoretical support. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text includes the following four parts:. The first part focuses on the basic theory of police administrative immediate coercive measures. This paper begins with the definition of police administration, immediate enforcement, police administrative immediate coercive measures, and so on. This paper analyzes the characteristics, types and legal basis of the immediate coercive measures of police administration in China. This part constitutes the basis and logical starting point for the discussion of the immediate coercive measures of the police administration and their application and perfection. In the second part, the author makes a comparative study on the system of immediate coercive measures of police administration in Taiwan and abroad. Through the analysis of the system of immediate coercive measures in Germany, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, This paper summarizes the successful experience of the immediate enforcement measures of police administration in countries and regions where the rule of law is relatively advanced, including the meticulous enforcement measures of the police administration, the complete range of coercive measures and the protection measures that attach great importance to human rights. The third part is used to analyze the existing problems in the police administrative immediate coercive measures, such as imperfect legislation, mixed law enforcement subjects, imperfect accountability mechanism and so on. The fourth part focuses on the problems that should be paid attention to in the judicial review of the police administrative prompt compulsion. In this part, this article mainly focuses on how to carry out the rationality review, the special requirements on the proof, the review before, the time limit for the prosecution. Administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation, special loss compensation and so on. In short, in order to ensure that the police administrative immediate enforcement measures have laws to abide by, must abide by the law, enforce the law strictly, and prosecute violations of the law, our country needs to constantly improve and strengthen the existing judicial review system. In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, and promote the process of legal construction in China.
【學位授予單位】：廣西民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14;D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 余凌云;緊急狀態(tài)下的警察預警與應急機制[J];法學;2004年08期

本文編號：1653324