我國民事非訟程序研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-06 11:02
本文選題:民事訴訟 切入點:非訟案件 出處:《海南大學》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:在大陸法系民事訴訟程序制度中,根據(jù)案件本質(zhì)、特點的不同,把案件分為訴訟案件和非訟案件,以訴訟案件和非訟案件為對象就有了相應的不同的審理程序。在我國現(xiàn)行《民事訴訟法》中沒有區(qū)分訴訟案件與非訟案件,也沒有以非訟案件為對象的民事非訟程序概念。但是,我國《民事訴訟法》中規(guī)定的特別程序的審理對象實質(zhì)上已經(jīng)具備了非訟案件的本質(zhì),特別程序也就是實質(zhì)意義上的民事非訟程序。目前已有一些學者對民事非訟程序有一定的研究,但是對民事非訟程序在民事司法領域中的角色和地位以及對民事非訟程序相關程序規(guī)則的立法的完善還是有所欠缺。文章從民事非訟程序的審理對象非訟案件切入,概述了民事非訟程序的基本理論。在深入探討了非訟案件的本質(zhì)和特征的基礎上,闡述了民事非訟程序與訴訟程序、特別程序及非訴訟程序的區(qū)別。為了對民事非訟程序有更全面、客觀的理解,考察了德國、日本、法國和俄國四國的民事非訟程序,通過考察得到了應當要完善我國民事非訟程序的程序規(guī)則、擴展我國民事非訟程序的調(diào)整范圍、運用多元程序體現(xiàn)不同的程序價值以及保持我國民事非訟程序的開放性這幾點啟示。在通過對我國民事非訟程序現(xiàn)狀的分析中總結(jié)出我國民事非訟程序存在著價值定位不明確、立法規(guī)定不科學、適用范圍較狹窄、救濟途徑不完善等問題。依據(jù)對我國民事非訟程序存在問題的原因的分析,建議要明確我國民事非訟程序的地位和價值,完善我國民事非訟程序的立法規(guī)定,強化我國民事非訟程序的功能,健全我國民事非訟程序向訴訟程序轉(zhuǎn)換的機制,完善我國民事非訟程序的救濟途徑。
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure system of civil law system, cases are divided into litigation cases and non-litigation cases according to the nature and characteristics of the cases. Taking litigation cases and non-litigation cases as the objects, there are corresponding different trial procedures. There is no distinction between litigation cases and non-litigation cases in the current Civil procedure Law of China. There is also no concept of civil non-litigation procedure for non-contentious cases. However, the object of special procedures stipulated in our country's Civil procedure Law has in essence possessed the essence of non-contentious cases. The special procedure is also the civil non-litigation procedure in the essence. At present, some scholars have studied the civil non-litigation procedure to a certain extent. However, the role and status of civil non-litigation proceedings in the field of civil justice and the perfection of the relevant procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings are still lacking. This paper summarizes the basic theory of civil non-contentious procedure, and on the basis of deeply discussing the essence and characteristics of non-contentious case, expounds the civil non-contentious procedure and litigation procedure. In order to have a more comprehensive and objective understanding of civil non-litigation proceedings, we examined civil non-litigation proceedings in Germany, Japan, France and Russia. Through investigation, we have obtained that we should perfect the procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country, and expand the adjustment scope of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country. By using multiple procedures to reflect different procedural values and to maintain the openness of civil non-litigation proceedings in China, the author concludes that the value orientation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China is not clear through the analysis of the present situation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China. The legislative provisions are not scientific, the scope of application is relatively narrow, the remedy channel is not perfect and so on. Based on the analysis of the causes of the problems existing in the civil non-litigation procedure in China, it is suggested that the status and value of the civil non-litigation procedure in our country should be clarified. The legislative provisions of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected, the function of civil non-litigation procedure should be strengthened, the mechanism of transforming civil non-litigation procedure into litigation procedure should be perfected, and the relief ways of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected.
【學位授予單位】:海南大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 姜巧靈;;非訟程序的缺陷及其完善[J];白城師范學院學報;2012年02期
2 章武生,楊嚴炎;德國民事訴訟制度改革之評析[J];比較法研究;2003年01期
3 王祥遠;;非訟程序芻議[J];長沙大學學報;2008年01期
4 鄒軍;;論我國民事非訟程序的調(diào)整范圍[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年S1期
5 章武生;;論我國大調(diào)解機制的構建——兼析大調(diào)解與ADR的關系[J];法商研究;2007年06期
6 郝振江;;論非訟程序在我國的重構[J];法學家;2011年04期
7 湯維建;王鴻雁;;我國非訟程序的立法問題及解決建議[J];廣東行政學院學報;2008年01期
8 孫永軍;;訴訟事件非訟化:含義、法理基礎與界限[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2009年03期
9 趙蕾;;訴訟與非訟的再區(qū)分——以訴訟與非訟基本模式的差異為研究進路[J];比較法研究;2012年04期
10 陳桂明;趙蕾;;比較與分析:我國非訟程序構架過程中的基本問題[J];河北法學;2010年07期
,本文編號:1574559
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1574559.html