財產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行中被害人權(quán)益保障實證分析
發(fā)布時間:2018-02-16 00:05
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 財產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行 被害人權(quán)益 保障 出處:《上海交通大學》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:在“法益侵害說”逐漸成為犯罪的本質(zhì)學說的情形下,犯罪侵害了國家、社會和個人的法益時,國家已然代表被害人追究行為人的責任的同時,被害人往往會莫名其妙的“被代表”,從而在一定程度上被害人權(quán)益的保障便被忽視。被害人不但受到了犯罪行為的侵害,要是再得不到國家司法行政機關(guān)的及時、妥當?shù)膶Υ,便容易導致“再次傷害”。在人?quán)保障和司法公正的理念已經(jīng)深入人心的今天,被害人的權(quán)益理應(yīng)得到刑事法學研究的更多關(guān)注,從而改變當前過分強調(diào)被告人權(quán)益而忽視被害人權(quán)益的現(xiàn)狀,以達到二者利益保障的平衡。本文以一定的司法實務(wù)為基礎(chǔ),通過對某基層人民法院2011-2013年的刑事審判、執(zhí)行中數(shù)據(jù)進行實證分析,對財產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行中被害人權(quán)益保障缺失的現(xiàn)象進行探討,就其存在的問題及成因深入分析,并提出積極、有效的完善措施,在當前司法改革的浪潮中穩(wěn)步推進被害人權(quán)益保障的機制建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Under the circumstances that "the doctrine of legal interest infringement" has gradually become the essential theory of crime, when the crime infringes upon the legal interests of the country, society and individuals, the state has already investigated the responsibility of the perpetrator on behalf of the victim, at the same time, Victims will often be "represented" inexplicably, thus the protection of the rights and interests of the victims will be ignored to a certain extent. The victims will not only be infringed by criminal acts, but will not be treated promptly and properly by the judicial and administrative organs of the state. Now that the concept of human rights protection and judicial justice is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, the rights and interests of victims should receive more attention from the study of criminal law. So as to change the current situation of over-emphasizing the rights and interests of the accused and neglecting the rights and interests of the victims, in order to achieve the balance between the interests of the two, this paper, based on certain judicial practice, through a grass-roots people's court in 2011-2013 criminal trial, Through the empirical analysis of the data in execution, this paper probes into the phenomenon of the lack of the protection of the rights and interests of the victims in the execution of property punishment, analyzes the existing problems and causes, and puts forward some positive and effective measures to improve it. In the current wave of judicial reform, steadily promote the protection of victims' rights and interests of the mechanism.
【學位授予單位】:上海交通大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱志峰;;日本現(xiàn)行罰金刑制度及發(fā)展趨向考察[J];當代法學;2007年05期
2 楊頎;;罰金刑執(zhí)行制度現(xiàn)狀及其完善[J];當代經(jīng)理人;2006年03期
3 玄松鶴;;韓國等國家罰金刑制度對我國的啟示[J];東疆學刊;2010年02期
4 胡承武;試論對犯罪被害人的救濟途徑[J];西華師范學院學報(社會科學版);2003年06期
5 肖建國;;論財產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行的理論基礎(chǔ)——基于民法和民事訴訟法的分析[J];法學家;2007年02期
6 閆旭彤;王琦;;公權(quán)力在被害人權(quán)利保護中的作用[J];法制與社會;2010年35期
7 章曉民;陳瑩;;論刑事被害人的知情權(quán)[J];法制與社會;2010年34期
8 王向紅;;論我國刑事被害人權(quán)利保護的制度完善[J];法制與社會;2011年19期
9 李克艷;袁愛華;;我國刑事被害人權(quán)利保護的不足及其完善[J];曲靖師范學院學報;2010年05期
10 王淑華;;刑事被害人權(quán)益保障的缺陷及其重塑[J];商丘師范學院學報;2011年08期
,本文編號:1514195
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1514195.html