本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事執(zhí)行 執(zhí)行難 強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行法　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行是民事訴訟程序的最后一個階段,是我國法律體系中不可或缺的重要制度。新修改的我國《民事訴訟法》雖然增加了對民事執(zhí)行的一些規(guī)定,但規(guī)定過于簡單且操作性不強(qiáng),司法實踐中民事執(zhí)行難的問題仍然存在,嚴(yán)重影響對當(dāng)事人權(quán)利的保障,也損害了法律的尊嚴(yán),妨礙社會和諧穩(wěn)定。同時它也直接關(guān)系到我國法院的威信乃至整個社會的穩(wěn)定。 民事執(zhí)行難目前主要表現(xiàn)為不少被執(zhí)行人長期下落不明、惡意轉(zhuǎn)移財產(chǎn)、暴力抗拒執(zhí)法、地方保護(hù)主義干擾民事執(zhí)行等問題,而造成上述執(zhí)行難的主要原因為我國實體法保障的缺陷、程序法保障的缺陷和社會體系的缺陷,因此執(zhí)行工作依舊困難重重。為解決以上執(zhí)行難問題,各級人民法院在司法實踐中也做了不少探索和創(chuàng)新,采取了很多的措施和方法,但是基于現(xiàn)行法律體系和社會體系的缺陷,目前仍無法改變民事執(zhí)行難的現(xiàn)狀。 本文通過分析并借鑒了法國、俄羅斯等國家的強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行立法經(jīng)驗及我國部分法院為緩解執(zhí)行難的對策,認(rèn)識到要完善我國的執(zhí)行法律體系,首先必須制定一部具有中國特色的《強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行法》。其次,在制度上也要有相關(guān)的跟進(jìn),如構(gòu)建聯(lián)動機(jī)制、規(guī)范協(xié)助執(zhí)行制度、加大刑事追究、加重違法成本、加大對財產(chǎn)保全的重視力度。再次,完善監(jiān)督體系,加強(qiáng)權(quán)力機(jī)構(gòu)即人大對法院民事執(zhí)行活動的監(jiān)督,貫徹新《民事訴訟法》的精神,將檢察機(jī)關(guān)對民事執(zhí)行活動的監(jiān)督落到實處。 通過以上努力,相信能有效緩解執(zhí)行難問題,優(yōu)化民事執(zhí)行工作使執(zhí)行變得高效,讓執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人的利益得到更好的維護(hù),更有利于判決的實現(xiàn)和法律權(quán)威的維護(hù)。
[Abstract]:Civil execution is the last stage of the civil procedure procedure and an indispensable and important system in our country's legal system. Although the newly amended Civil procedure Law of China has added some provisions on civil enforcement, But the stipulation is too simple and the operation is not strong, the problem of difficult civil execution in judicial practice still exists, which seriously affects the protection of the rights of the parties, and also damages the dignity of the law. It is also directly related to the prestige of our courts and the stability of the whole society. At present, the difficulties in civil enforcement are mainly manifested in the long-term unaccounted whereabouts of many of the executed persons, the malicious transfer of property, the violent resistance to law enforcement, the interference of local protectionism in civil enforcement, and so on. The main reasons for the above difficulties are the defects of the substantive law, the procedural law and the social system, so the implementation is still difficult. In order to solve the above problems, People's courts at all levels have also made many explorations and innovations in judicial practice and adopted many measures and methods. However, due to the defects of the current legal system and social system, it is still unable to change the current situation of civil enforcement difficulties. By analyzing and learning from the experience of enforcement legislation in France, Russia and other countries and the countermeasures of some courts in our country to alleviate the difficulty of enforcement, this paper realizes that we should perfect the enforcement law system of our country. First of all, we must formulate an enforcement law with Chinese characteristics. Secondly, we must also have relevant follow-up measures in the system, such as establishing a linkage mechanism, standardizing the system of assisting enforcement, increasing criminal prosecution, and increasing the cost of breaking the law. Pay more attention to property preservation. Third, improve the supervisory system, strengthen the supervision of civil enforcement activities by the people's Congress, and implement the spirit of the new Civil procedure Law. The supervision of procuratorial organs over civil enforcement activities will be put into practice. Through the above efforts, I believe that it can effectively alleviate the implementation of difficult problems, optimize civil enforcement work to make execution more efficient, so that the interests of the parties to enforce better maintenance, more conducive to the realization of judgments and the maintenance of legal authority.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢克波;試論“審執(zhí)分家”的必要性[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年06期

2 肖建國,趙晉山;民事執(zhí)行若干疑難問題探討[J];法律適用;2005年06期

3 蔣陸軍;;論民事“執(zhí)行難”之地方保護(hù)主義[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2010年02期

4 于瑤;;破解執(zhí)行難的對策[J];法制與社會;2011年01期

5 溫柳;;民事執(zhí)行難新探——以克服協(xié)助執(zhí)行難為切入點[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

6 賀季敏;;論《強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行法》的單獨制定[J];北京社會科學(xué);2013年01期

7 王琳;;民事訴訟執(zhí)行難問題之完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2013年04期

8 季衛(wèi)東;徐昕;;“執(zhí)行難”的理論爭鳴:公力救濟(jì)與私力救濟(jì)之間的競爭與互補(bǔ)[J];時代法學(xué);2007年01期

9 王敬源;邵玲;;民事判決“執(zhí)行難”問題研究[J];今日科苑;2010年06期

10 高執(zhí)辦;國外執(zhí)行機(jī)構(gòu)概覽[J];人民司法;2001年03期

，

本文編號：1509998