【摘要】： 船舶留置權(quán)是船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)中的一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容。建立以船舶為客體的留置權(quán)制度,對(duì)保護(hù)海事債權(quán)人的利益有著特別重要的意義�！逗Ｉ谭ā返�25條僅界定了特定意義下的船舶留置權(quán),對(duì)其他類型船舶留置權(quán)的法律地位卻未作明確規(guī)定,從而使得船舶留置權(quán)制度不夠完善。目前,我國(guó)海商法學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)船舶留置權(quán)制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究者尚屬少見。 恰逢我國(guó)《物權(quán)法》頒布不久,本文從完善我國(guó)船舶留置權(quán)制度的角度出發(fā),以民法上一般留置權(quán)的含義、法律性質(zhì)、行使及效力的一般理論為指導(dǎo),結(jié)合相關(guān)國(guó)際公約和國(guó)外立法的有關(guān)規(guī)定,系統(tǒng)分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律在船舶留置權(quán)方面規(guī)定的不足之處,并針對(duì)性地提出完善我國(guó)《海商法》中船舶留置權(quán)規(guī)定的建議。 本文第1章闡述了完整的船舶留置權(quán)概念,并對(duì)船舶留置權(quán)進(jìn)行了具體的分類;第2章主要是對(duì)船舶留置權(quán)成立的要件及效力問題進(jìn)行了理論分析;第3章分析了船舶留置權(quán)消滅的原因和后果;第4章通過船舶留置權(quán)與其他船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別的比較研究,著重分析了船舶留置權(quán)與其他船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)之間的受償順位關(guān)系;第5章討論了船舶留置權(quán)的行使及實(shí)現(xiàn)問題;第6章結(jié)論部分,通過對(duì)以上各方面的充分、詳盡的分析,得出了如何完整構(gòu)建我國(guó)船舶留置權(quán)制度的總體結(jié)論。 本文的出發(fā)點(diǎn)及最終目的是為了對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》中有關(guān)船舶留置權(quán)規(guī)定的增加和修改有所裨益,以利于我國(guó)完整的船舶留置權(quán)制度體系的構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:The lien of ship is an important content in the real right of ship security. The establishment of the lien system, which takes the ship as the object, is of special importance to the protection of the interests of the maritime creditors. Article 25 of the Maritime Law only defines the lien of the ship in a specific sense. However, the legal status of other types of ship lien is not clearly regulated, which makes the system of ship lien imperfect. At present, the system of marine lien system is rare in the maritime law academic circles of our country. Just before the promulgation of our country's Real right Law, this paper, from the point of view of perfecting our country's ship lien system, is guided by the general theory of the meaning, legal nature, exercise and validity of the general lien in civil law. In combination with the relevant international conventions and the relevant provisions of foreign legislation, this paper systematically analyzes the deficiencies of the provisions of the current laws of our country in the aspect of ship lien, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the provisions of the ship lien in Maritime Law of our country. Chapter 1 expounds the concept of ship lien and classifies it concretely, the second chapter mainly analyzes the essentials and validity of the establishment of ship lien. Chapter 3 analyzes the causes and consequences of the elimination of ship lien. Chapter 4 focuses on the relationship between the ship lien and other ship security interests through a comparative study of the relationship and differences between the ship lien and other ship security interests. Chapter 5 discusses the issue of the exercise and realization of the ship lien, and the conclusion of chapter 6, through the full and detailed analysis of the above aspects, draws the general conclusion of how to construct the whole system of the ship lien in our country. The starting point and the ultimate purpose of this paper are to benefit the increase and modification of the provisions on the lien of ships in Maritime Law of China, so as to facilitate the construction of a complete system of the lien on ships in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 崔建遠(yuǎn) ,宋延軍;關(guān)于抵押權(quán)的探討[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1990年03期

2 詹云燕;論留置權(quán)的成立要件[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年01期

3 李志文;論我國(guó)船舶留置權(quán)的概念[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1996年00期

4 薛祖望;船舶留置權(quán)若干法律問題探究[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1997年00期

5 徐孝先;論船舶留置權(quán)的特征[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1998年00期

6 許俊強(qiáng);船舶留置權(quán)若干法律問題研究[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1999年00期

7 安壽志,李原,張功;論占有與船舶留置權(quán)[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2002年00期

8 李后華;;船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)的設(shè)定與競(jìng)存效力[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn);2005年12期

9 周繼紅;;論司法扣押和船舶留置權(quán)的關(guān)系[J];珠江水運(yùn);2006年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 尹新橋;論海商法中的留置權(quán)[D];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院;2001年

2 張禹;船舶留置權(quán)法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2001年

3 李楠;論海事請(qǐng)求的優(yōu)先順位[D];大連海事大學(xué);2004年

4 黃瑩;船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)的消滅問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2305056