發(fā)布時間：2018-06-06 07:11

  本文選題：責任期間 + 強制責任期間　； 參考：《復旦大學》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文以海上承運人的責任期間為研究對象,通過比較國內審判實務、相關國際公約、正在起草的運輸法草案等,分析我國《海商法》中責任期間制度所面臨的問題,并提出解決方案。 遵循提出問題、分析問題、解決問題的思路,全文分為以下幾個部分: 引言闡明論文的選題意義、當前研究現(xiàn)狀、論文的目的以及研究路徑與方法。 第一章介紹海上貨物運輸合同的類型,明確本文所討論的貨物運輸類型為提單運輸,介紹提單運輸和責任期間的關系,并提出本文所要解決的問題。 第二章界定責任期間的概念。本章首先介紹國內所存在的爭議,然后比較我國臺灣地區(qū)學者的定義,以及《海牙規(guī)則》、《維斯比規(guī)則》、《漢堡規(guī)則》和運輸法草案中的規(guī)定,得出《海商法》中的責任期間僅為強制責任期間;之后比較該強制責任期間、一般責任期間、法律適用期間、責任范圍和合同期間等幾個概念的差別和聯(lián)系。 第三章主要分析責任和強制責任期間的關系。本章首先從歷史的角度討論責任和強制責任期間的發(fā)展變化,分析《海牙規(guī)則》、《維斯比規(guī)則》和《漢堡規(guī)則》里的不足,并對運輸法草案里的規(guī)定進行評價。以此為基礎,對我國《海商法》進行分析,指出強制責任期間內承運人的主給付義務為運輸義務,而一般責任期間內承運人的主給付義務為運輸和交付義務。 第四章則具體討論責任期間和強制責任期間的存續(xù)期間。本章首先概要介紹強制責任期間存續(xù)期間的發(fā)展過程,然后具體分析實際承運人、多式聯(lián)運經(jīng)營人和無船承運人在我國《海商法》下的強制責任期間和一般責任期間。最后分析強制責任期間和一般責任期間開始和終結的標準。 第五章首先介紹其它貨物運輸方式的責任期間,然后討論該責任期間和海上承運人的責任期間的銜接問題。本章共討論五種運輸方式,至于管道運輸,雖然不屬于合同法第17章所調整的貨物運輸方式,鑒于其在現(xiàn)實中應用的比較廣泛,也在該章中一并討論。 最后一部分為結語。首先對本文的觀點進行總結和概括,然后提出修改建議。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the period of liability of the maritime carrier as the research object, analyzes the problems faced by the liability period system in Maritime Law of China by comparing domestic trial practice, relevant international conventions and the draft of the transport law that is being drafted. And put forward the solution. Following the ideas of problem raising, problem analysis and problem solving, the paper is divided into the following parts: The introduction clarifies the significance of the topic, the current research situation, the purpose of the paper, and the research path and method. The first chapter introduces the type of contract of carriage of goods by sea. It is clear that the type of transport of goods discussed in this paper is the transport of bill of lading. It introduces the relationship between bill of lading transportation and liability period, and puts forward the problems to be solved in this paper. The second chapter defines the concept of the period of responsibility. This chapter first introduces the domestic disputes, and then compares the definitions of scholars in Taiwan and the provisions of the Hague rules, Visby rules, Hamburg rules and the draft Transport Law. It is concluded that the period of liability in Maritime Law is only the period of compulsory liability, and then the differences and relations between the concepts of the period of compulsory liability, the period of general liability, the period of application of law, the scope of liability and the period of contract are compared. The third chapter mainly analyzes the relationship between the period of liability and compulsory liability. This chapter first discusses the development of liability and compulsory liability from a historical point of view, analyzes the shortcomings of the Hague rules, the Visby rules and the Hamburg rules, and evaluates the provisions of the draft Transport Law. Based on this analysis, the author points out that the carrier's main obligation during the period of compulsory liability is the obligation of carriage, while the obligation of carrier's main payment during the period of general liability is the obligation of carriage and delivery. The fourth chapter discusses the period of liability and the period of compulsory liability. This chapter firstly introduces the developing process of the period of compulsory liability, and then analyzes the period of compulsory liability and the period of general liability of actual carrier, multimodal transport operator and non-ship carrier under the Maritime Law of China. Finally, it analyzes the criteria for the beginning and end of compulsory liability period and general liability period. Chapter five first introduces the period of responsibility of other modes of carriage of goods, and then discusses the connection between the period of responsibility and that of the carrier at sea. This chapter discusses five modes of transport, as for pipeline transportation, although it is not part of the freight transport mode adjusted in Chapter 17 of the contract Law, it is also discussed in this chapter in view of its wide application in reality. The last part is the conclusion. First of all, summarize and summarize the views of this paper, and then put forward suggestions for modification.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D996.19;D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 欒們們;論提單債權關系的法律適用[D];大連海事大學;2011年

2 高磊;國際海上貨物運輸承運人責任期間問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2010年

3 毛青云;海運承運人交付貨物問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1985711