本文選題：股東會(huì) + 可撤銷決議�。� 參考：《廈門大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東會(huì)決議在公司的整體運(yùn)作過(guò)程中十分重要,因此,《中華人民共和國(guó)公司法》在公司股東會(huì)召開(kāi)、形成公司意思等方面都有相應(yīng)制度和規(guī)則,這些制度和規(guī)則有利于公司的意思和決議得以公平公正的形成。但實(shí)踐中,股東會(huì)決議的形成操作總會(huì)存在一些程序或內(nèi)容上的瑕疵,這些瑕疵,必然在某種程度上損害公司股東或者第三者的利益。 股東會(huì)決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度作為對(duì)瑕疵股東會(huì)決議的一種救濟(jì),被世界各國(guó)廣泛采用,其目的在于通過(guò)制度救濟(jì)來(lái)保證股東會(huì)決議的合法性和合理性,也使公司、股東及利害關(guān)系人的利益得到保證。鑒于一套完善的股東會(huì)決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度對(duì)于公司在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中正常運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的重要性,本文通過(guò)對(duì)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究,同時(shí)結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題,試圖發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度中存在哪些需要改進(jìn)之處,爾后加以分析,并借鑒國(guó)外或者國(guó)內(nèi)其他法域內(nèi)的相關(guān)立法,為我國(guó)該項(xiàng)制度的完善提出可行性建議,使之更加符合社會(huì)發(fā)展和司法實(shí)踐的需要。 除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,文章分為四個(gè)章節(jié)： 第一部分介紹了股東會(huì)決議瑕疵的基本理論。首先,論述了股東會(huì)決議瑕疵的界定、成因及類型。其次,承上啟下地對(duì)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵的救濟(jì)途徑進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要介紹。 第二部分論述了股東會(huì)決議的撤銷問(wèn)題。一方面通過(guò)比較法分析,比較我國(guó)和國(guó)外先進(jìn)制度間的差異；另一方面歸納了決議撤銷的事由,并系統(tǒng)地論述可撤銷決議的救濟(jì)途徑及不同救濟(jì)方式的具體適用條件。 第三部分論述了股東會(huì)決議的無(wú)效問(wèn)題。首先介紹了世界各國(guó)的相關(guān)立法、司法和學(xué)說(shuō),比較我國(guó)和先進(jìn)制度間的差異；其次歸納了決議無(wú)效的事由,并闡述無(wú)效決議的救濟(jì)途徑及不同救濟(jì)方式的具體適用條件。 第四部分對(duì)我國(guó)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度的不足之處提出了完善的建議。從我國(guó)司法實(shí)證角度入手,就北大法寶所載的近13年有關(guān)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵糾紛的案例進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,歸納出我國(guó)司法審判實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題,有針對(duì)性地提出了完善我國(guó)股東會(huì)決議瑕疵訴訟救濟(jì)制度的若干建議。
[Abstract]:The resolution of the shareholders' meeting is very important in the whole operation of the company. Therefore, the Company Law of the people's Republic of China has corresponding systems and rules for the convening of the shareholders' meeting and the formation of the meaning of the company. These systems and rules are conducive to the fair and equitable formation of the company's intentions and decisions. However, in practice, there are always some defects in the procedure or content of the shareholders' resolution, which will inevitably damage the interests of the shareholders or the third party to some extent. As a kind of relief to the resolution of defective shareholders' meeting, the system of shareholders' resolution is widely used by countries all over the world. Its purpose is to guarantee the legitimacy and rationality of the resolution of shareholders' meeting through system relief, and also to make the company, The interests of shareholders and interested parties are guaranteed. In view of the importance of a set of perfect remedy system for shareholders' resolution defects to the normal operation of the company in the market economy, this paper makes a systematic study on the remedy system of shareholders' resolution defects, and at the same time combines with the problems existing in judicial practice. This paper tries to find out what needs to be improved in the remedy system of shareholders' resolution defects, and then analyzes it, and draws lessons from the relevant legislation in foreign or other domestic jurisdictions, and puts forward some feasible suggestions for the perfection of this system in our country. Make it more in line with the needs of social development and judicial practice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is divided into four chapters: The first part introduces the basic theory of shareholders' resolution defect. First, it discusses the definition, causes and types of shareholders' resolution defects. Secondly, it briefly introduces the remedy ways of shareholders' resolution defect. The second part discusses the cancellation of shareholders' meeting resolution. On the one hand, through comparative analysis, the differences between China and foreign advanced systems are compared; on the other hand, the reasons of resolution revocation are summarized, and the relief ways of revocable resolutions and the specific applicable conditions of different relief methods are systematically discussed. The third part discusses the invalidity of shareholders'meeting resolution. Firstly, it introduces the relevant legislation, judicature and doctrine of the world, compares the difference between our country and the advanced system; secondly, summarizes the reason of the invalidation of the resolution, and expounds the relief ways of the invalid resolution and the specific applicable conditions of the different relief methods. The fourth part puts forward the perfect suggestion to the defect remedy system of the shareholders' meeting in our country. From the angle of judicial demonstration in our country, this paper makes a statistical analysis on the cases concerning the defect disputes of shareholders' meeting resolutions in the past 13 years, and concludes the problems existing in the judicial practice of our country. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the remedy system of the resolution of shareholders' meeting in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 姜山;;公司機(jī)關(guān)決議瑕疵訴訟若干法律問(wèn)題探析[J];法律適用;2011年08期

2 丁勇;;德國(guó)公司決議瑕疵訴訟濫用問(wèn)題研究及啟示[J];比較法研究;2013年04期

3 張民安;公司股東的表決權(quán)[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

4 蔡立東;公司治理中的“多數(shù)派暴政”問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年05期

5 李建偉;;公司決議效力瑕疵類型及其救濟(jì)體系再構(gòu)建——以股東大會(huì)決議可撤銷為中心[J];商事法論集;2008年02期

6 陳群峰;;論公司決議瑕疵的司法介入——以保持司法干預(yù)與公司自治的平衡為視角[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

7 李建偉;;論公司決議可撤銷的適用事由——基于司法適用立場(chǎng)的立法解釋[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1842041