本文選題：海事賠償責任限制　切入點：海事賠償責任限制主體　出處：《上海海事大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文根據國際海事公約和我國海商法律、法規(guī)，結合海事審判實務，討論和研究海事賠償責任限制的若干理論和實踐問題。文章認為： 海事賠償責任限制是一項具有悠久歷史的海事法律制度，也是一項不同于民事賠償原則的特殊法律制度�！�1957年海船所有人責任限制國際公約》和《1976年海事索賠責任限制公約》在擴大責任限制主體、促進航運業(yè)發(fā)展；提高責任限額、合理限制責任；海上人身傷亡損害賠償的特別保護；以及賠償方式有利于債權人、責任人的原則呈現(xiàn)統(tǒng)一趨勢。 國際海事界經過近百年的運作，對海事賠償責任限制的調整范圍達成比較一致的共識，形成了比較完整的制度體系，這套制度包括責任限制的主體、限制性債權和非限制性債權的范圍、賠償限額標準以及喪失責任限制的條件等。 《海商法》規(guī)定，海事賠償責任限制主體包括船舶所有人、船舶承租人、船舶經營人、救助人、責任保險人及船舶所有人、救助人的雇傭人、代理人等。筆者認為，《國際海運條例》規(guī)定的“無船承運人”作為以承運人身份經營海上運輸的公共承運人，因其不擁有船舶、不經營控制船舶，區(qū)別于對船舶具有利益的船舶所有人、船舶承租人及船舶經營人等責任限制主體，從而無法限制賠償責任。 關于海事賠償責任限制與海事賠償責任限制基金的關系。設立海事賠償責任限制基金不應以責任人是否喪失海事賠償責任限制為審查標準；海事賠償責任限制基金將對債權人行使債權的影響。 關于海事賠償責任限制與船舶優(yōu)先權的關系。船舶優(yōu)先權的規(guī)定不影響海事賠償責任限制的實施；海事賠償責任限制基金設立和分配將影響和消滅船舶優(yōu)先權。 最后分析了我國海事賠償責任限制制度適用方面的特點及有關程序問題，指出了我國海事賠償責任限制制度的缺陷并提出相應的立法對策。 總之，，海事賠償責任限制制度中還有許多有爭議的問題亟待解決。筆者僅提出了自己的看法，不足之處敬請指正。
[Abstract]:Based on the international maritime conventions and Chinese maritime laws and regulations, combined with the maritime trial practice, this paper discusses and studies some theoretical and practical problems concerning the limitation of liability for maritime claims. Limitation of liability for maritime claims is a maritime legal system with a long history. It is also a special legal regime different from the principle of civil compensation. The 1957 International Convention on the limitation of the liability of owners of ships and the 1976 Convention on limitation of liability for Maritime claims expand the subject of liability limitation, promote the development of the shipping industry, and raise the liability limit, The principle of reasonable limitation of liability; special protection of compensation for personal injury and injury at sea; and the principle of compensation in favour of creditors and responsible persons show a unified trend. After nearly one hundred years of operation, the international maritime community has reached a relatively consistent consensus on the scope of the adjustment of the limitation of liability for maritime claims, and has formed a relatively complete system system, which includes the subject of the limitation of liability. The scope of restrictive and non-restrictive claims, limits of compensation and conditions for loss of liability. The Maritime Law stipulates that the subject of limitation of liability for maritime claims includes the owner of the ship, the charterer, the operator of the ship, the salvor, the liable insurer and the owner of the ship, and the servant of the salvor, The author thinks that the "non-ship carrier" stipulated in the International Maritime regulations, as a public carrier who operates maritime transport as a carrier, does not own the ship and does not operate and control the ship. Different from the owner, charterer and operator of the ship, it is impossible to limit the liability. On the relationship between limitation of liability for maritime claims and limitation fund for liability for maritime claims. The establishment of the limitation fund for liability for maritime claims should not be based on whether the person responsible loses the limitation of liability for maritime claims as the standard of examination; The effect of the limitation of liability for maritime claims on the creditor's rights. On the relationship between limitation of liability for maritime claims and maritime liens. The provisions of maritime liens do not affect the implementation of limitation of liability for maritime claims; the establishment and distribution of the limitation fund for maritime liability will affect and destroy maritime liens. Finally, this paper analyzes the characteristics of the limitation system of maritime claims liability and some procedural problems, points out the defects of the limitation system of maritime claims liability in China and puts forward the corresponding legislative countermeasures. In a word, there are still many controversial problems in the limitation system of maritime claims liability.
【學位授予單位】：上海海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.294;D996.19

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 朱成康;海事賠償責任限制若干問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

2 梁鴻鶴;我國鐵路旅客人身傷亡限額賠償制度的法律研究[D];北京交通大學;2010年

3 李妍;海事賠償責任限制制度若干問題研究[D];復旦大學;2010年

4 肖益紅;南非海事賠償責任限制制度研究[D];湘潭大學;2012年

本文編號：1698561