本文選題：運(yùn)輸合同　切入點(diǎn)：格式合同　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 運(yùn)輸合同中的保價(jià)條款是限制承運(yùn)人賠償責(zé)任的一種格式條款,在我們的日常生活中經(jīng)�？梢杂鲆�(如民航行李運(yùn)輸、快遞服務(wù)等)。這類條款雖然被許多法律所確認(rèn),但在司法實(shí)踐中如何適用卻經(jīng)常引起爭(zhēng)議。本文引用兩個(gè)商法人之間的典型案例。分析了因承運(yùn)貨物丟失所產(chǎn)生的運(yùn)輸合同糾紛,對(duì)于保價(jià)條款的適用效力問(wèn)題、法院如何裁決問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了思考。 保價(jià)條款作為一種格式條款,它的使用提高了締約效率,有其存在的合理性、必要性。在運(yùn)輸實(shí)務(wù)中發(fā)揮著巨大作用,豐富發(fā)展了合同法。但它的存在是對(duì)契約自由的一種限制,也是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)合同法的一種沖擊。一切都應(yīng)在理性科學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)上嚴(yán)格規(guī)制保價(jià)條款的效力,追求保價(jià)條款中的利益平衡。 本文共分四章。第一章,通過(guò)引述兩個(gè)典型案例,簡(jiǎn)單描述了基本案情,引出了運(yùn)輸合同中由保價(jià)條款引發(fā)的糾紛問(wèn)題,從而歸納出本案的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題；第二章,簡(jiǎn)單介紹保價(jià)條款的基本理論,尤其對(duì)本案中涉及到的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行逐一闡述；第三章,筆者就本案結(jié)合前一章的法理分析運(yùn)用各種分析方法進(jìn)行深入的剖析；第四章,筆者重點(diǎn)論述了物流運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域關(guān)于保價(jià)條款存在的爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題和解決對(duì)策,并且對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)保價(jià)條款的規(guī)制存在的缺陷及完善措施進(jìn)行了剖析。這其中,既有完善立法的建議,也有運(yùn)輸合同雙方在貿(mào)易中就保價(jià)條款應(yīng)當(dāng)注意的問(wèn)題。 保價(jià)條款的出現(xiàn),一方面提高了效率,節(jié)約了交易成本,便于企業(yè)進(jìn)行管理；另一方面也給傳統(tǒng)的契約自由理論帶來(lái)巨大的沖擊。在我國(guó)物流業(yè)蓬勃發(fā)展的今天,如果我們不能正確認(rèn)識(shí)其價(jià)值,對(duì)其進(jìn)規(guī)制,完善立法,就會(huì)對(duì)和諧社會(huì)的公平正義、誠(chéng)信友愛、安定有序等造成損害,阻礙和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:The warranty clause in the contract of carriage is a formality clause that limits the carrier's liability and is often encountered in our daily life (such as air baggage transport, express service, etc.) although such clauses are confirmed by many laws, However, how to apply it in judicial practice is often controversial. This paper cites a typical case between two commercial law parties, and analyzes the dispute of contract of carriage arising from the loss of carriage of goods, and the validity of the application of the warranty clause. The court thought about how to rule on the matter. As a form clause, the use of the insured clause improves the efficiency of contracting, has its rationality and necessity, and plays an important role in the practice of transportation. The existence of contract law is not only a restriction to the freedom of contract, but also an impact on the traditional contract law, all of which should be strictly regulated on the basis of rational science. Pursue the balance of interests in the warranty clause. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter, by quoting two typical cases, briefly describes the basic case, leads to the dispute caused by the insurance clause in the contract of carriage, and concludes the focus of the case. Briefly introduce the basic theory of the insurance clause, especially the relevant concepts involved in the case one by one; chapter III, the author of the case combined with the previous chapter of the jurisprudence of the use of various analytical methods for in-depth analysis; chapter four, The author focuses on the dispute problems and solutions in the field of logistics transportation, and analyzes the defects and perfection measures of the regulation of price insurance clauses in the current law of our country. There are not only suggestions to perfect legislation, but also some problems that both parties should pay attention to in trade. On the one hand, it improves the efficiency, saves the transaction cost, and facilitates the management of the enterprise; on the other hand, it also brings a huge impact to the traditional theory of freedom of contract. If we can't understand its value correctly, regulate it and perfect legislation, it will damage the fairness and justice, honesty and friendship, stability and order of harmonious society, and hinder the construction of harmonious society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郝勝林;;合同格式條款效力分析[J];哈爾濱金融高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

2 李曉霞,劉桂占;論《合同法》有關(guān)格式條款的解釋與適用[J];現(xiàn)代金融;2003年11期

3 尹華廣;論我國(guó)格式條款立法規(guī)制的不足與完善[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

4 蔣國(guó)艷;;論我國(guó)格式條款立法存在的缺陷及其完善[J];中共南寧市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 陳昶;羅懿;;運(yùn)輸合同中保價(jià)條款的效力及其排除適用的條件[J];人民司法;2008年24期

6 沈曉明;論我國(guó)合同法對(duì)格式合同的法律規(guī)制[J];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

7 齊艷銘,姬曉紅;保價(jià)運(yùn)輸若干法律問(wèn)題初探[J];鐵道貨運(yùn);2004年05期

8 李升朝;公路汽車客運(yùn)合同糾紛的分析與解決[J];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

9 韓從容;論格式合同的價(jià)值沖突與利益平衡機(jī)制[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年06期

10 王利明;對(duì)《合同法》格式條款規(guī)定的評(píng)析[J];政法論壇;1999年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1645896