本文選題：公司法　切入點(diǎn)：強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定　出處：《武漢理工大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：公司是現(xiàn)代社會(huì)最主要的經(jīng)濟(jì)組織形式,以之為規(guī)制對(duì)象的公司法也日漸凸現(xiàn)其重要性,但理論和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)公司法的性質(zhì)即公司法屬于強(qiáng)行法還是任意法的認(rèn)識(shí)卻不盡統(tǒng)一,由此導(dǎo)致各國(guó)公司法中體現(xiàn)公司參與人自治的任意性規(guī)范與體現(xiàn)國(guó)家干預(yù)的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的比例及兩者的地位也迥異,如何調(diào)整、配置、適用公司法中的各種規(guī)范成為公司立法、執(zhí)法、司法等活動(dòng)中的關(guān)鍵,甚至成為提高一個(gè)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)能力、促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的決定性因素,基于此,本文選取其中的一部分—公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范作為研究對(duì)象,旨在為我國(guó)公司法的發(fā)展、完善提供基礎(chǔ)性的研究資料,提出些許有價(jià)值的建議和意見(jiàn)。 對(duì)公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的研究,勢(shì)必涉及到方方面面的問(wèn)題,因此,本文運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)分析、歷史分析、系統(tǒng)分析、比較分析、實(shí)證分析等多種方法,從法律規(guī)范這二法學(xué)中最基礎(chǔ)的入手，從解決實(shí)踐中的具體問(wèn)題出發(fā),運(yùn)用國(guó)家干預(yù)理論和現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的企業(yè)契約理論,針對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《公司法》中強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范配置中存在的不足和司法實(shí)務(wù)中的困惑,提出相應(yīng)的完善方式、補(bǔ)救措施和應(yīng)對(duì)之策。 公司法作為民商法的一個(gè)部門(mén),屬于私法范疇,而其卻包含大量的屬于公法性質(zhì)的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范。本文首先對(duì)公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范進(jìn)行研究的前提性概述和基礎(chǔ)性說(shuō)明,并且欲論證強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范存在的正當(dāng)性。其次闡述了公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范存在的狀態(tài),旨在論證公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范在公司法中存在的范圍及其態(tài)勢(shì)。最后針對(duì)我國(guó)公司法中國(guó)家強(qiáng)制存在的問(wèn)題提出了相關(guān)的建議和思路；合理確定公司法中強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范和任意性規(guī)范的結(jié)構(gòu)；明晰公司法中國(guó)家強(qiáng)制的界限；處理好法律的明確性與政府自由裁量權(quán)之間的關(guān)系；對(duì)國(guó)家強(qiáng)制進(jìn)行必要的合理的限制等。 本文并沒(méi)有一個(gè)確定的中心,只是圍繞“公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范”這一主線,首先論述了其存在的價(jià)值,其次對(duì)其存在狀態(tài)進(jìn)行考察,最終落腳在公司法立法與司法上,針對(duì)公司法的不足和司法實(shí)踐中的問(wèn)題提出解決之道,解決現(xiàn)實(shí)矛盾、突破現(xiàn)實(shí)困境。
[Abstract]:Company is the most important form of economic organization in modern society, and the company law, which is the object of regulation, is becoming more and more important. However, the understanding of the nature of company law in theory and practice, that is, whether the company law belongs to compulsory law or arbitrary law, is not uniform. As a result, the proportion and status of the arbitrary norms reflecting the autonomy of company participants and the mandatory norms embodying state intervention in the company law of various countries are also very different. How to adjust, configure and apply all kinds of norms in the company law becomes the company legislation. The key of law enforcement and judicial activities even becomes the decisive factor to improve a country's economic competitiveness and promote economic development. Based on this, this paper selects a part of the compulsory norms of company law as the object of study. The purpose is to provide basic research materials for the development and perfection of our company law, and to put forward some valuable suggestions and suggestions. The study of mandatory norms of company law is bound to involve various problems. Therefore, this paper uses many methods, such as economic analysis, historical analysis, systematic analysis, comparative analysis, empirical analysis, etc. Starting from the most basic of the two jurisprudence, starting from solving the specific problems in practice, the author applies the theory of state intervention and the theory of enterprise contract in modern economics. In view of the deficiency in the compulsory norm allocation and the confusion in the judicial practice in the present Company Law of our country, this paper puts forward the corresponding perfect ways, remedial measures and countermeasures. Corporate law, as a department of civil and commercial law, belongs to the category of private law, but it contains a large number of mandatory norms of public law. And to demonstrate the legitimacy of the existence of mandatory norms. Secondly, the existence of mandatory norms of corporate law state, The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the scope and situation of mandatory norms of company law in company law. Finally, some suggestions and ideas are put forward in view of the problems existing in China's company law. Reasonably determine the structure of mandatory and arbitrary norms in company law; clarify the boundaries of state coercion in company law; deal with the relationship between legal clarity and government discretion; and impose necessary and reasonable restrictions on the state. This article does not have a definite center, only revolves around "the company law compulsory norm" this one main line, first elaborated its existence value, then carried on the inspection to its existence condition, finally settled in the company law legislation and the judicature. Aiming at the deficiency of the company law and the problems in the judicial practice, the author puts forward some solutions to solve the realistic contradiction and break through the realistic predicament.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜作文;耿佳寧;;公司章程自治與公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的界限[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

2 金彭年;;法律規(guī)避中的強(qiáng)制性和禁止性規(guī)范研究[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

3 李劍;;公司法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的正當(dāng)性解說(shuō)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年18期

4 司偉;契約視野下的公司自治與政府干預(yù)——從“健力寶事件”看我國(guó)公司法律制度應(yīng)強(qiáng)調(diào)的理念[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

5 李昌麒;張波;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的國(guó)家干預(yù)觀與市場(chǎng)調(diào)節(jié)觀——對(duì)國(guó)家與市場(chǎng)分析范式的一種解讀[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期

6 普麗芬;從公司法規(guī)則的分類(lèi)界定公司章程的邊界[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

7 沈四寶;;新《公司法》的新亮點(diǎn)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2006年01期

8 王凱華;轉(zhuǎn)投資行為的法律處置[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;1999年02期

9 李婧,陶峰軍;企業(yè)法人經(jīng)營(yíng)范圍的反思[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2005年05期

10 王彥明,傅穹;論公司轉(zhuǎn)投資及其立法完善[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 陸金保;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉坤;公司自治研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 趙云德;論現(xiàn)代契約法中強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的理念基礎(chǔ)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

2 宋尚華;公司契約理論和公司法中的強(qiáng)制[D];中國(guó)人民大學(xué);2005年

3 邵廷娟;法國(guó)民事互助契約制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1625617