【摘要】：惡意串通制度在我國(guó)民事法律司法實(shí)踐中的適用問(wèn)題一直是法學(xué)界探討的重要問(wèn)題,有關(guān)惡意串通制度的存廢問(wèn)題一直爭(zhēng)論不休,尤其是在合同法領(lǐng)域,《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱《合同法》)第52條關(guān)于合同無(wú)效的情形本身就由于其違反合同法鼓勵(lì)交易原則以及當(dāng)事人意思自治的原則而在適用過(guò)程中被加以限制,該條第二款又因惡意串通制度是直接引進(jìn)大陸法系國(guó)家和前蘇聯(lián)的相關(guān)制度得來(lái)而在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中遇到了水土不服的情形,本文通過(guò)著眼于探討《合同法》第52條第二款在理論上水土不服的原因以及在司法實(shí)踐適用過(guò)程中與其他條款存在法律界限模糊的問(wèn)題,提出相應(yīng)的解決措施,并向我國(guó)制定民法典提出建議,以保障相關(guān)制度能夠更好更完善的得到施行。
[Abstract]:The application of malicious collusion system in the judicial practice of civil law in our country has always been an important issue discussed in the field of law, and the existence or abolition of malicious collusion system has been controversial, especially in the field of contract law. Article 52 of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the contract Law) concerning the invalidity of a contract is itself restricted in the course of its application because it violates the principle of encouraging transactions in contract law and the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties, The second paragraph of this article, because the malicious collusion system is directly introduced into the relevant systems of civil law countries and the former Soviet Union, has encountered a situation of disobedience in the judicial practice of our country. This paper probes into the reasons why the second paragraph of Article 52 of the contract Law is not satisfied in theory and the problem that there are vague legal boundaries with other provisions in the process of judicial practice, and puts forward some corresponding measures to solve them. And put forward some suggestions to our country to formulate the civil code, in order to ensure that the relevant system can be better and more perfect to be implemented.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄒忠玉;侯德斌;;以合法形式掩蓋非法目的行為研究[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 鄒忠玉;王俊儒;侯德斌;;合同無(wú)效之“惡意串通”法律研究[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年06期

3 楊代雄;;惡意串通行為的立法取舍——以惡意串通、脫法行為與通謀虛偽表示的關(guān)系為視角[J];比較法研究;2014年04期

4 王利明;;論無(wú)效合同的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法律適用;2012年07期

5 郭平宜;;論故意非真實(shí)意思表示[J];河北法學(xué);2008年09期

6 劉治斌;;司法過(guò)程中的法律發(fā)現(xiàn)及其方法論析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 張家慧;處分原則下的當(dāng)事人訴訟行為[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年03期

8 張耕;質(zhì)疑無(wú)效合同性質(zhì)的絕對(duì)化[J];法學(xué);2005年05期

9 張廣興;法律行為之無(wú)效——從民法通則到民法典草案[J];法學(xué)論壇;2003年06期

10 趙萬(wàn)一,吳曉鋒;契約自由與公序良俗[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 莊顯睿;惡意串通損害第三人利益合同的效力分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 嚴(yán)小艷;通謀虛偽表示研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2479345