計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-29 08:14
【摘要】：隨著高科技的快速發(fā)展，尤其是計(jì)算機(jī)軟件技術(shù)的不斷進(jìn)步，軟件的功能越來(lái)越多，越來(lái)越超越人們的想象，并伴隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的發(fā)展改變了現(xiàn)代社會(huì)人類的生活。計(jì)算機(jī)軟件代表了信息時(shí)代的主要特征，在生活方面，它給人們帶來(lái)了各種新的娛樂(lè)方式和信息溝通方式，不斷創(chuàng)造豐富的精神產(chǎn)品；在工作方面，它強(qiáng)大的信息處理能力和無(wú)紙化辦公等徹底改變了人們的工作方式，提高了工作效率。不僅如此，計(jì)算機(jī)軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)每年能為社會(huì)創(chuàng)造非常可觀的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益，其在一個(gè)國(guó)家的各個(gè)行業(yè)都發(fā)揮著舉足輕重的作用。這使得計(jì)算機(jī)軟件侵權(quán)行為發(fā)生的越來(lái)越普遍，侵權(quán)形式各式各樣。軟件侵權(quán)活動(dòng)的猖獗首先損害了軟件開(kāi)發(fā)商的利益，進(jìn)而打擊了其不斷創(chuàng)新軟件技術(shù)的積極性，最終軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展低迷，損害的還是整個(gè)社會(huì)的利益。因此，為了在法律上更好的保護(hù)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件權(quán)益不受侵犯，如何認(rèn)定計(jì)算機(jī)軟件侵權(quán)行為便成為法律人士爭(zhēng)相探討的一個(gè)主要問(wèn)題。 世界上大多數(shù)國(guó)家包括我國(guó)都是以著作權(quán)法來(lái)保護(hù)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件作品的，著作權(quán)法一開(kāi)始就是為保護(hù)文學(xué)、藝術(shù)等文字作品而制定的，但是計(jì)算機(jī)軟件是最近幾十年才逐漸發(fā)展起來(lái)的，，和傳統(tǒng)作品有著很大的不同。因此本文首先從軟件作品和侵權(quán)行為所具有的特殊性出發(fā)，探討了軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，最后筆者在已有理論的基礎(chǔ)上提出了自己對(duì)侵權(quán)行為認(rèn)定的一些看法。下面就簡(jiǎn)單介紹一下： 軟件作品本身既有具有一般作品的性質(zhì)，也具有很多不同于一般作品的特殊性質(zhì)，這些決定了對(duì)軟件作品的侵權(quán)行為在一定程度上不同于一般作品的侵權(quán)行為。軟件作品在著作權(quán)上有很多權(quán)利受到保護(hù)，在實(shí)際發(fā)生的軟件侵權(quán)案例中，涉及到最多的和侵權(quán)認(rèn)定比較復(fù)雜的行為是對(duì)軟件作品的復(fù)制和修改的行為，這也是本文主要研究的方面。我國(guó)在立法上并沒(méi)有詳細(xì)的規(guī)定軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定方法和具體步驟。筆者從普遍到具體、一般到特殊的角度，分析了認(rèn)定軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為時(shí)需要始終遵守的總原則和不同的具體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，又針對(duì)軟件侵權(quán)中存在的反向工程和最終用戶侵權(quán)兩個(gè)特殊問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了另外討論。在著作權(quán)法上，思想與表達(dá)相區(qū)分原則被普遍適用于軟件作品，當(dāng)然軟件作品也分為思想與表達(dá)，但是其表達(dá)的形式有文字部分和非文字部分兩種，還有在文字部分上也與一般作品有很大的區(qū)別。軟件作品的這些特別之處使得在適用“抽象概括法”和“實(shí)質(zhì)性相似加接觸”原則等不同的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí)，要考慮到具體實(shí)施細(xì)節(jié)方面的不同方面，以確保正確適用法律。這兩種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)目的都是為了認(rèn)定侵權(quán)行為，在認(rèn)定過(guò)程中第一個(gè)步驟都是要先排除軟件作品的思想，而“抽象概括法”可以更好的劃分思想和表達(dá)，“實(shí)質(zhì)性相似加接觸”原則可以更好的具體對(duì)比兩個(gè)軟件中的表達(dá)，認(rèn)定是否侵權(quán)。這兩個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不是獨(dú)立的關(guān)系，具有一定的交叉關(guān)系，而且將它們綜合運(yùn)用可以取其所長(zhǎng)，能夠更好的認(rèn)定侵權(quán)行為。在軟件侵權(quán)中又有很多特殊問(wèn)題需要特殊認(rèn)定處理，以反向工程和最終用戶侵權(quán)為例，不僅要考慮侵犯軟件過(guò)程中的復(fù)制行為和行為的商業(yè)性質(zhì)等因素，而且還要根據(jù)著作權(quán)法上的“思想與表達(dá)相區(qū)分原則”和“利益平衡原則”分析我國(guó)相關(guān)立法和如何認(rèn)定此種情況下的侵權(quán)行為。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of high technology, especially the progress of computer software technology, the function of the software is becoming more and more, more and more than people's imagination, and the development of the Internet has changed the life of the modern society. Computer software represents the main characteristics of the information age, and in the aspect of life, it brings various new forms of entertainment and information communication to people, and constantly creates rich spiritual products; in the aspect of work, Its powerful information processing ability and paperless office change the way people work, and improve the working efficiency. Moreover, the computer software industry can create considerable economic benefits for society every year, and it plays a very important role in every industry in a country. This makes the infringement of computer software more and more widespread, and the forms of infringement are various. The rampant software infringement activity first damages the interests of the software developer, and further the enthusiasm of the software development technology, and finally the development of the software industry is weak, the damage is also the benefit of the whole society. Therefore, in order to protect the computer software's rights and interests without infringement in the law, how to determine the infringement of the computer software becomes a major problem that the law people are scrambling to explore. Most of the countries in the world include the copyright law to protect the computer software works, the beginning of the copyright law is to protect the works of literature, art and so on, but the computer software has developed gradually in recent decades There's a lot of difference between traditional and traditional works. In the same way, from the particularity of the software work and the tort, this paper discusses the standard of the software copyright infringement, and finally, on the basis of the existing theory, the author puts forward some views on the infringement. Act. Here's a simple introduction. The software work itself has the nature of the general works, and it also has a lot of special properties which are different from the general works, which determines the infringement of the software works to a certain extent different from the invasion of the general works The right behavior. The software works have a lot of rights in the copyright. In the case of the actual software infringement, the more complex behaviors involved in the infringement of the software are the behavior of the copying and modification of the software works, which is also the main research in this paper. In our country, there are no detailed methods and tools for the determination of the copyright infringement of the software in the legislation. The author analyses the general principle and the different specific standards which need to be always followed in the infringement of software copyright, and the two special problems of the reverse engineering and the end-user's infringement in the software infringement are also discussed. In the copyright law, the principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression is universally applicable to the software works. Of course, the software works are divided into the thought and the expression, but the expression form has both the character part and the non-text part, and the text part also has a great deal with the general work The difference between the software works makes it possible to take into account the different aspects of the specific implementation details in the application of different criteria such as the "abstract generalization method" and "substantial similarity and contact" principles to ensure proper fit In order to identify the infringement, the first step in the determination process is to first rule out the idea of the software work, and the "abstract generalization method" can better divide the thought and expression. The "substantial similarity and contact" principle can compare the expression of the two software more specifically, and the recognition is that No infringement. The two standards are not independent, have a certain cross-relation, and their comprehensive application can be taken as the director, and the invasion can be better recognized. The right behavior. There are many special problems in the software infringement. Special identification processing is required. In order to take the case of reverse engineering and end-user infringement as an example, it is not only to consider the commercial nature of the copying behavior and behavior during the software infringement Factors such as the "The principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression" and "principle of interest balance" of the copyright law should be analyzed to analyze the relevant legislation in China and how to determine the invasion in this situation
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
本文編號(hào)：2449330
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of high technology, especially the progress of computer software technology, the function of the software is becoming more and more, more and more than people's imagination, and the development of the Internet has changed the life of the modern society. Computer software represents the main characteristics of the information age, and in the aspect of life, it brings various new forms of entertainment and information communication to people, and constantly creates rich spiritual products; in the aspect of work, Its powerful information processing ability and paperless office change the way people work, and improve the working efficiency. Moreover, the computer software industry can create considerable economic benefits for society every year, and it plays a very important role in every industry in a country. This makes the infringement of computer software more and more widespread, and the forms of infringement are various. The rampant software infringement activity first damages the interests of the software developer, and further the enthusiasm of the software development technology, and finally the development of the software industry is weak, the damage is also the benefit of the whole society. Therefore, in order to protect the computer software's rights and interests without infringement in the law, how to determine the infringement of the computer software becomes a major problem that the law people are scrambling to explore. Most of the countries in the world include the copyright law to protect the computer software works, the beginning of the copyright law is to protect the works of literature, art and so on, but the computer software has developed gradually in recent decades There's a lot of difference between traditional and traditional works. In the same way, from the particularity of the software work and the tort, this paper discusses the standard of the software copyright infringement, and finally, on the basis of the existing theory, the author puts forward some views on the infringement. Act. Here's a simple introduction. The software work itself has the nature of the general works, and it also has a lot of special properties which are different from the general works, which determines the infringement of the software works to a certain extent different from the invasion of the general works The right behavior. The software works have a lot of rights in the copyright. In the case of the actual software infringement, the more complex behaviors involved in the infringement of the software are the behavior of the copying and modification of the software works, which is also the main research in this paper. In our country, there are no detailed methods and tools for the determination of the copyright infringement of the software in the legislation. The author analyses the general principle and the different specific standards which need to be always followed in the infringement of software copyright, and the two special problems of the reverse engineering and the end-user's infringement in the software infringement are also discussed. In the copyright law, the principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression is universally applicable to the software works. Of course, the software works are divided into the thought and the expression, but the expression form has both the character part and the non-text part, and the text part also has a great deal with the general work The difference between the software works makes it possible to take into account the different aspects of the specific implementation details in the application of different criteria such as the "abstract generalization method" and "substantial similarity and contact" principles to ensure proper fit In order to identify the infringement, the first step in the determination process is to first rule out the idea of the software work, and the "abstract generalization method" can better divide the thought and expression. The "substantial similarity and contact" principle can compare the expression of the two software more specifically, and the recognition is that No infringement. The two standards are not independent, have a certain cross-relation, and their comprehensive application can be taken as the director, and the invasion can be better recognized. The right behavior. There are many special problems in the software infringement. Special identification processing is required. In order to take the case of reverse engineering and end-user infringement as an example, it is not only to consider the commercial nature of the copying behavior and behavior during the software infringement Factors such as the "The principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression" and "principle of interest balance" of the copyright law should be analyzed to analyze the relevant legislation in China and how to determine the invasion in this situation
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐昱春;;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為認(rèn)定[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期
2 游閩鍵;最終用戶侵權(quán)判決第一案的法律思考[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年02期
3 壽步;;創(chuàng)意不應(yīng)受到版權(quán)保護(hù)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年10期
4 孫海龍;姚建軍;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事審判中事實(shí)問(wèn)題與法律問(wèn)題辨析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年11期
5 董峰君;;從“微軟侵犯字體著作權(quán)案”看國(guó)產(chǎn)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年24期
6 田園;李帥;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)法保護(hù)方法評(píng)析[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年07期
7 呂炳斌;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)保護(hù)和盜版問(wèn)題研究[J];科技與法律;2002年03期
8 江波;張金平;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法鑒定相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];科技與法律;2009年05期
9 張振亮,盛大銓;關(guān)于我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件法律保護(hù)的若干思考[J];南京郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期
10 李國(guó)泉;壽仲良;董文濤;;實(shí)質(zhì)性相似加接觸的侵權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)判斷[J];人民司法;2010年16期
本文編號(hào)：2449330
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2449330.html
最近更新
教材專著
