【摘要】：隨著中國城鎮(zhèn)化的不斷發(fā)展,城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程的不斷加快,各地為了適應(yīng)城鎮(zhèn)化的發(fā)展,紛紛推行宅基地置換政策。宅基地置不僅關(guān)系國家建設(shè)、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,同樣也是農(nóng)民根本利益所在。在各地宅基地置換進(jìn)程中,侵犯失地農(nóng)民利益的現(xiàn)象也不乏出現(xiàn)。本文對我國現(xiàn)階段城鎮(zhèn)化中宅基地置換補(bǔ)償問題進(jìn)行研究,不僅對宅基地置換補(bǔ)償法律制度的完善提供了一定的幫助,為宅基地置換實(shí)踐中的補(bǔ)償提供更多科學(xué)合理的依據(jù),同樣也為暢通失地農(nóng)民權(quán)利救濟(jì)渠道提供借鑒意義,使失地農(nóng)民合法利益得到保護(hù),鞏固黨的群眾基礎(chǔ)。本文從城鎮(zhèn)化、宅基地制度、宅基地置換制度為切入點(diǎn),分析了我國城鎮(zhèn)化的發(fā)展趨勢與問題所在,對我國宅基地制度發(fā)展歷程做了簡要的總結(jié)與分析,研究了宅基地置換制度的法律內(nèi)涵和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文重點(diǎn)探討了宅基地置換補(bǔ)償問題,對其法學(xué)本質(zhì)和補(bǔ)償模式進(jìn)行了簡要分析,同時(shí)總結(jié)并提出其現(xiàn)存法律規(guī)范中存在的一系列問題。最后通過對美國、日本相關(guān)法律研究借鑒,從實(shí)體法和程序法兩個(gè)方面對城鎮(zhèn)化中的宅基地置換補(bǔ)償問題進(jìn)項(xiàng)研究。就實(shí)體法方面而言,現(xiàn)階段宅基地置換補(bǔ)償缺乏統(tǒng)一的法律規(guī)范,各地方政府自行制定地方性法規(guī)來加以規(guī)定和執(zhí)行,公正性得到質(zhì)疑。在程序法方面,由于缺乏實(shí)體法的統(tǒng)一規(guī)范,在宅基地置換補(bǔ)償?shù)恼麄�(gè)過程中,程序不合法現(xiàn)象普遍,而最為嚴(yán)重的便是缺乏公眾的參與,公告程序和聽證程序流于形式。在宅基地置換補(bǔ)償中,很多地方失地農(nóng)民的合法權(quán)利得不到有效的保護(hù),這不僅是民生建設(shè)的大事,也影響到社會(huì)穩(wěn)定。為此,筆者認(rèn)為制定統(tǒng)一的宅基地置換補(bǔ)償?shù)姆梢?guī)范已刻不容緩只有這樣才能不斷實(shí)現(xiàn)實(shí)體公正和程序公正,這不僅有利于保障失地農(nóng)民的合法權(quán)利,也有助于我國法律體系的不斷完善,推動(dòng)法治社會(huì)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of urbanization in China and the acceleration of urbanization process, in order to adapt to the development of urbanization, various localities have promoted the policy of land replacement. Homestead is not only related to national construction, economic development, but also the fundamental interests of farmers. In the process of homestead replacement, the phenomenon of violating the interests of land-lost farmers also appears. This paper studies the compensation of homestead replacement in the current urbanization of our country, which not only provides some help to perfect the legal system of homestead replacement compensation, but also provides more scientific and reasonable basis for the practice of homestead replacement compensation. It also provides reference for the relief channel of land lost farmers' rights, so that the legitimate interests of lost land farmers can be protected, and the mass foundation of the Party can be consolidated. From the perspective of urbanization, homestead system and homestead replacement system, this paper analyzes the development trend and problems of China's urbanization, and makes a brief summary and analysis of the development process of China's homestead system. This paper studies the legal connotation and practical significance of the house land replacement system. This paper focuses on the compensation for homestead replacement, briefly analyzes its legal nature and compensation mode, and sums up and puts forward a series of problems existing in its existing legal norms. Finally, through the relevant legal research of the United States and Japan, from the substantive law and procedural law to study the compensation for homestead replacement in urbanization. As far as the substantive law is concerned, the compensation for homestead replacement is lack of uniform legal norms at present, and local governments make local laws and regulations to regulate and implement them themselves, and the fairness of compensation is questioned. In the aspect of procedural law, due to the lack of unified norms of substantive law, in the whole process of compensation for homestead replacement, the illegality of the procedure is common, and the most serious is the lack of public participation, the announcement procedure and the hearing procedure are merely formal. In the compensation of homestead replacement, the legal rights of landless farmers in many places cannot be effectively protected, which is not only a great event in the construction of people's livelihood, but also has an impact on social stability. Therefore, the author believes that it is urgent to formulate a unified legal norm of compensation for the replacement of homestead. Only in this way can substantive justice and procedural justice be continuously realized, which is not only conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights of farmers who have lost their land. It is also conducive to the continuous improvement of our legal system and promote the development of the rule of law society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張蕊;;國外土地征收補(bǔ)償制度考察[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

2 王書成;;論比例原則中的利益衡量[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 鄭成良;論法治理念與法律思維[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 張瑛;;最低生活保障制度的效率分析[J];金陵科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

5 屈茂輝;周志芳;;中國土地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究——基于地方立法文本的分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年03期

6 朱林興;;農(nóng)村宅基地置換的若干問題[J];上海市經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

7 楊蘭橋;;我國新型城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展趨勢探討[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;2013年06期

8 王靜;;中美土地征收和土地糾紛解決機(jī)制研討會(huì)綜述[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2008年04期

9 王遠(yuǎn)燃;宅基地概念更新──湖北省的調(diào)查[J];中國土地;1998年12期

10 藍(lán)宇蘊(yùn);都市村社共同體——有關(guān)農(nóng)民城市化組織方式與生活方式的個(gè)案研究[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳少瓊;土地征收法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 成輝霞;失地農(nóng)民權(quán)益保護(hù)法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2013年

2 史波;集體土地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)法律問題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

3 康永信;中國特色城鎮(zhèn)化道路國際經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2441689