【摘要】：歷史上關于制定民法典存在三次大的爭論,這些爭論給后世民法典的制定以有益的啟示。我國關于民法典的制定也經(jīng)歷了一個較為復雜的過程。黨的十八屆四中全會提出"制定民法典",明確我國制定民法典的目標,但在民法典的體例結構、立法模式等方面仍然存在一定的爭議。盡管制定目標明確,還需要考察我國現(xiàn)行民法典的制定時機是否成熟、立法條件是否具備。根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)行民事立法的經(jīng)驗以及民法學理論的準備狀況,我國現(xiàn)行民法典應采用漸進式的立法路徑,第一步是先出臺民法總則,~①該項工作已在做,《民法總則(草案)》已廣泛征求社會意見;第二步是編纂民法典各分編,當然這有賴于對民法典分編結構共識的達成,否則這個工作的進度會很慢;第三步是編纂民法典,這是在民法各分編的基礎上開展的系統(tǒng)編纂與整理工作,工作難度倒不是很大,關鍵是第二步的工作。調整對象的復雜性、學術理論準備的不足、立法任務的艱巨性、立法技術的復雜性決定了其出臺也是較為曲折的過程,當前需要在以下方面如學者共識的達成、民法典分編的編纂工作的啟動、理論知識的儲備以及社會公眾基本法律素養(yǎng)的養(yǎng)成等做一些必要的準備工作,從而為我國民法典的順利出臺創(chuàng)造更為有利的時機。
[Abstract]:There are three great debates about the formulation of civil code in history, which give beneficial enlightenment to the formulation of civil code in later generations. The formulation of civil code in our country has also experienced a relatively complex process. The fourth Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) put forward the formulation of the Civil Code, which made clear the goal of formulating the Civil Code in our country. However, there are still some controversies in the system structure and legislative model of the Civil Code. Although the goal is clear, it is necessary to examine whether the current civil code of our country is ripe or not and whether the legislative conditions are available. According to the experience of our country's current civil legislation and the preparation of the theory of civil law, the current civil code of our country should adopt the gradual legislative path. The first step is to introduce the general principles of the civil law first, and this work is already being done. The General provisions of the Civil Code (draft) have been widely consulted; The second step is to compile the civil code, which, of course, depends on reaching a consensus on the structure of the civil code, otherwise the progress of this work will be very slow; The third step is to codify the civil code, which is a systematic compilation and arrangement work on the basis of the various parts of the civil law, but the work is not very difficult, and the key is the work of the second step. The complexity of the adjustment object, the lack of preparation for academic theory, the arduous nature of legislative tasks, and the complexity of legislative technology determine that it is also a more tortuous process for its introduction. At present, it needs to be reached in the following areas, such as the consensus of scholars. The starting of the compilation of the civil code, the reserve of the theoretical knowledge and the formation of the basic legal literacy of the public do some necessary preparatory work, so as to create a more favorable opportunity for the smooth introduction of the civil code of our country.
【作者單位】： 山東大學威海分校;
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 封麗霞;世界民法典編纂史上的三次論戰(zhàn)——“法典化”與“非法典化”思想之根源與比較[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2002年04期

2 梁慧星;制定民法典的設想[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2001年02期

3 王利明;論中國民法典的制訂[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;1999年01期

4 王利明;論中國民法典的制訂[J];政法論壇;1998年05期

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王太平;;中國民法典的“知識化”:理由和具體方案[J];知識產(chǎn)權;2017年11期

2 王曉翔;;論我國商譽權法律保護制度的構建[J];金陵法律評論;2016年01期

3 汪全勝;;論我國民法典的立法路徑選擇[J];外國法制史研究;2016年00期

4 劉志剛;;一般人格權形成路徑的憲法學分析[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2017年05期

5 厲盡國;;中國《民法典》編纂中的習慣法問題[J];交大法學;2017年03期

6 藍藍;;《民法總則》法源規(guī)定之評析——以法典的開放性為切入點[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2017年05期

7 楊正宇;;由“知識產(chǎn)權收益”窺探“知識產(chǎn)權入典”[J];貴州師范大學學報(社會科學版);2017年03期

8 陳寒非;;民法典編纂中的民事習慣:從事實到規(guī)范的轉化[J];民間法;2017年01期

9 趙磊;;民法典編纂中的立法模式悖論——基于商法規(guī)范如何安排的視角[J];北方法學;2017年03期

10 陳建華;;民法典編纂背景下民法與憲法的關系——基于司法實踐視角[J];法治論壇;2017年01期

【二級參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 江平;制訂民法典的幾點宏觀思考[J];政法論壇;1997年03期

2 魏振瀛;中國的民事立法與民法法典化[J];中外法學;1995年03期

，

本文編號：2437953