【摘要】：隨著機(jī)動(dòng)車交易市場(chǎng)的迅猛發(fā)展，交易中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題也越來(lái)越復(fù)雜，完善機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)的法律規(guī)制是一個(gè)迫切的問(wèn)題。而機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)與機(jī)動(dòng)車登記是息息相關(guān)的，對(duì)登記與物權(quán)變動(dòng)兩者的關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究，不僅能為解決理論界的爭(zhēng)議提供參考，促進(jìn)機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)立法的完善，而且還具有明晰機(jī)動(dòng)車登記效力與機(jī)動(dòng)車權(quán)利歸屬等司法實(shí)踐上的意義。本文立足于我國(guó)立法，結(jié)合實(shí)際中機(jī)動(dòng)車管理與交易的特點(diǎn)，運(yùn)用比較分析、理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際的方法，對(duì)機(jī)動(dòng)車登記與物權(quán)變動(dòng)這個(gè)問(wèn)題的理解提出了自己的建議。 本文總共分了四個(gè)部分對(duì)這個(gè)論題予以論述。 第一部分是機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)概述。這個(gè)部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹了機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)的內(nèi)涵，包括機(jī)動(dòng)車概念、類型、什么是機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)以及我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的法律規(guī)定，主要是《物權(quán)法》的規(guī)定。該部分主要是對(duì)機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)的一個(gè)整體把握，，并引出登記與之權(quán)利歸屬密不可分的關(guān)系。 第二部分是機(jī)動(dòng)車登記的法律界定。這個(gè)部分對(duì)機(jī)動(dòng)車登記的內(nèi)容、性質(zhì)與功能作了詳細(xì)的介紹。機(jī)動(dòng)車登記主要有注冊(cè)登記、變更登記、轉(zhuǎn)移登記、抵押登記、注銷登記、質(zhì)押登記。機(jī)動(dòng)車登記具有行政法與民法的雙重性質(zhì)，在生活中既有助于管理交通，也有維護(hù)交易安全的作用。該部分指出機(jī)動(dòng)車登記與物權(quán)變動(dòng)的問(wèn)題，就是如何看待機(jī)動(dòng)車登記效力的問(wèn)題，為下文論述作出鋪墊。 第三部分是本文的重點(diǎn)，深入分析機(jī)動(dòng)車登記效力的問(wèn)題。首先，對(duì)登記生效主義的學(xué)說(shuō)作出了評(píng)析，通過(guò)利弊分析指出，在我國(guó)，機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)不適合登記生效主義。其次，對(duì)合意生效+登記對(duì)抗主義的學(xué)說(shuō)作出了評(píng)析。指出此模式有一定優(yōu)勢(shì)，但不能適用于機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)所有場(chǎng)合。最后，在對(duì)有關(guān)機(jī)動(dòng)車登記效力的學(xué)說(shuō)爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行分析評(píng)價(jià)后，得出我國(guó)適用的理論。即機(jī)動(dòng)車物權(quán)變動(dòng)采用的是混合模式的結(jié)論，具體為合意生效+登記對(duì)抗模式與交付生效+登記對(duì)抗模式，前者適用于機(jī)動(dòng)車的抵押權(quán)設(shè)立，后者適用與機(jī)動(dòng)車所有權(quán)變動(dòng)等領(lǐng)域。并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)登記與交付的關(guān)系，善意第三人范圍的問(wèn)題展開了分析。 第四部分是有關(guān)機(jī)動(dòng)車登記的其他問(wèn)題。一是未登記的機(jī)動(dòng)車所有權(quán)變動(dòng)的法律適用問(wèn)題，即未注冊(cè)登記的機(jī)動(dòng)車與注冊(cè)登記的機(jī)動(dòng)車應(yīng)該區(qū)別對(duì)待。二是機(jī)動(dòng)車登記與交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任問(wèn)題，即在我國(guó)的登記對(duì)抗主義模式下，嚴(yán)格區(qū)分所有人與實(shí)際侵權(quán)人的責(zé)任。對(duì)立法上存在的一些問(wèn)題提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the motor vehicle trading market, the problems in the transaction are becoming more and more complex. It is an urgent problem to perfect the legal regulation of the real right change of motor vehicles. The change of real rights of motor vehicles is closely related to the registration of motor vehicles. The research on the relationship between the registration and the change of real rights can not only provide a reference for the settlement of disputes in theorists, but also promote the perfection of the legislation on real rights of motor vehicles. But also has the clear motor vehicle registration effect and the motor vehicle right attribution and so on the judicial practice significance. Based on the legislation of our country, combined with the characteristics of motor vehicle management and transaction in practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the understanding of motor vehicle registration and real right change by means of comparative analysis and the combination of theory and practice. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the topic. The first part is a summary of the real right changes of motor vehicles. This part briefly introduces the connotation of the change of the real right of motor vehicle, including the concept and type of motor vehicle, what is the change of the real right of motor vehicle and the current legal provisions of our country, mainly the provisions of the property Law. This part is a whole grasp of the change of motor vehicle real right, and leads to the inseparable relationship between registration and the ownership of the right. The second part is the legal definition of motor vehicle registration. This part makes a detailed introduction to the content, nature and function of motor vehicle registration. Motor vehicle registration mainly includes registration, change registration, transfer registration, mortgage registration, cancellation registration, pledge registration. Motor vehicle registration has the dual nature of administrative law and civil law. It not only helps to manage traffic in life, but also plays a role in maintaining transaction safety. This part points out the problem of motor vehicle registration and the change of real right, that is, how to treat the effect of motor vehicle registration, which lays the groundwork for the following discussion. The third part is the focus of this paper, in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of motor vehicle registration. First of all, the author makes a comment on the theory of registration effectivist, and points out that in our country, the change of motor vehicle real right is not suitable for registered effectivist theory through the analysis of its pros and cons. Secondly, a comment is made on the doctrine of adversarial doctrine of consensual entry into force. It is pointed out that this model has some advantages, but it can not be applied to all situations of real right change of motor vehicles. Finally, after analyzing and evaluating the theory disputes about the effectiveness of motor vehicle registration, the applicable theory of our country is obtained. That is to say, the change of the real right of the motor vehicle adopts the conclusion of the mixed mode, specifically the mode of consenting to the effective registration countermeasure mode and the delivery effective registration countermeasure mode, the former is suitable for the establishment of the mortgage of the motor vehicle. The latter applies to motor vehicle ownership changes and other areas. On this basis, it analyzes the relationship between registration and delivery, the scope of bona fide third party. The fourth part is about other problems of motor vehicle registration. The first is the legal application of the change of ownership of unregistered motor vehicles, that is, unregistered motor vehicles and registered motor vehicles should be treated differently. The second is the issue of motor vehicle registration and liability for damages in traffic accidents, that is, under the mode of registration antagonism in our country, the liability of owner and actual infringer is strictly distinguished. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程嘯;尹飛;;論物權(quán)法中占有的權(quán)利推定規(guī)則[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

2 劉書正;張東;董健;任建通;;道路交通事故中“機(jī)動(dòng)車所有人”的確定[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年22期

3 李智,李鳳章;登記生效主義和登記對(duì)抗主義的比較考察[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

4 陳實(shí);李曉暉;;機(jī)動(dòng)車登記中的物權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題探析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

5 葉梅;乙增武;;動(dòng)產(chǎn)占有與登記的效力沖突及解決[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年04期

6 趙鳴;論物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式的選擇[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

7 王榮珍;;論物權(quán)變動(dòng)未登記不得對(duì)抗之善意第三人范圍[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

8 張卓梅;陳文舉;;債權(quán)相對(duì)性的突破與保留[J];人民論壇;2011年32期

9 向逢春;;質(zhì)疑我國(guó)物權(quán)法中的二元公示主義[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

10 金松華;董麗霞;;一物二賣的法律責(zé)任分析[J];中國(guó)校外教育;2009年S1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 汪瑩;我國(guó)機(jī)動(dòng)車登記制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

2 曹海生;我國(guó)機(jī)動(dòng)車交易物權(quán)變動(dòng)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2433163