發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-19 12:16

【摘要】：科學(xué)日新月異的發(fā)展帶來(lái)企業(yè)生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)的技術(shù)性、專業(yè)性不斷提高,從而引發(fā)的環(huán)境問(wèn)題不可避免成為制約社會(huì)發(fā)展的重要環(huán)節(jié)。隨著環(huán)境問(wèn)題不斷引發(fā),傳統(tǒng)以“排放”為主的環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)形式已無(wú)法涵蓋環(huán)境侵權(quán)的所有內(nèi)容,進(jìn)入立法者和普通大眾視線的是損害更為嚴(yán)重的生態(tài)破壞,且生態(tài)破壞因其自身特殊性,《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》無(wú)力應(yīng)對(duì)。2016年4月14日,第424期民商法前沿論壇在中國(guó)人民大學(xué)隆重舉行。會(huì)議針對(duì)當(dāng)前環(huán)境侵權(quán)溢出性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行廣泛討論,相關(guān)環(huán)境法學(xué)者做了發(fā)言,表達(dá)了對(duì)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行整治的急迫心情�，F(xiàn)行《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》將環(huán)境問(wèn)題作為單獨(dú)章節(jié)加以調(diào)整,并以“環(huán)境污染責(zé)任為題”,第65條也做出了“因污染環(huán)境造成損害的,污染者應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任”的相應(yīng)規(guī)定。在環(huán)境侵權(quán)問(wèn)題上,一些立法理念其標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并非實(shí)質(zhì)意義上的價(jià)值衡量,而是一種“經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先”的思想。公法與私法的沖突,人身權(quán)利、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利以及精神權(quán)利的私益性與環(huán)境侵權(quán)的公益性之間的矛盾,正隨著環(huán)境問(wèn)題的發(fā)展不斷涌現(xiàn),引發(fā)學(xué)者廣泛關(guān)注。本文以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第65條為視角,對(duì)侵權(quán)法所存在的問(wèn)題,環(huán)境侵權(quán)面臨的困境進(jìn)行分析,運(yùn)用各種研究方法,在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)立法進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)的基礎(chǔ)上,提出自己的一些見(jiàn)解。并對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)的溢出性問(wèn)題做積極可行性設(shè)想,以此突破傳統(tǒng)民法框架,尋求環(huán)境侵權(quán)問(wèn)題更理想的走向。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of science has brought about the technical and professional development of enterprises' production activities, which inevitably leads to environmental problems that restrict the development of society. With the environmental problems being caused constantly, the traditional environmental pollution tort form based on "discharge" has been unable to cover all the contents of the environmental tort, and it is the more serious ecological damage that has come to the attention of the legislators and the general public. Because of its own particularity, the Tort liability Law is unable to deal with ecological damage. On April 14, 2016, the 424 Forum on the Frontier of Civil and Commercial Law was held in Renmin University of China. At the meeting, the spillover problem of environmental tort was extensively discussed, and the relevant environmental law scholars made a speech, expressing the urgency of solving the problem. The current Tort liability Law adjusts environmental issues as a separate chapter, and takes environmental pollution liability as its title. Article 65 also provides that "polluters shall bear tort liability if damage is caused by pollution to the environment". On the issue of environmental tort, the standard of some legislative ideas is not the value measure in essence, but a thought of "economic development first". The conflict between public law and private law, the contradiction between personal rights, property rights and spiritual rights, and the public welfare of environmental tort, is emerging with the development of environmental problems, which has aroused widespread concern of scholars. From the perspective of Article 65 of the Tort liability Law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Tort Law and the plight of the Environmental Tort, and applies various research methods to study the relevant legislation at home and abroad. Put forward some of your own ideas. And make the positive feasibility assumption to the spillover problem of the environmental tort, so as to break through the traditional civil law frame, and seek the more ideal trend of the environmental tort problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 竺效;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)原因行為的立法拓展[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年02期

2 王利民;李昱;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任的構(gòu)成:解讀新《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》第64條[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

3 呂忠梅;;論生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的綜合決策法律機(jī)制[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年03期

4 竺效;;論中國(guó)環(huán)境法基本原則的立法發(fā)展與再發(fā)展[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

5 呂忠梅;;生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的法治思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2014年05期

6 張新寶;莊超;;擴(kuò)張與強(qiáng)化:環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任的綜合適用[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年03期

7 曾祥生;方昀;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)行為的特征及其類型化研究[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

8 薛丹;;基于環(huán)境責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的動(dòng)態(tài)環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)體系研究[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2012年07期

9 王曉輝;;日本公害補(bǔ)償制度評(píng)析與借鑒[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2011年16期

10 戴茂華;;論進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任立法的必要性——兼評(píng)《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中環(huán)境污染責(zé)任條款[J];河北法學(xué);2011年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 呂忠梅;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)的二元性[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2386906