雇員致第三人損害的雇主責任研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-10 19:55
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展以及人們生活消費水平的日益提高,雇傭關系屢見不鮮,而由此引發(fā)的雇主責任糾紛隨之而來。在理論上,我國對于雇員致第三人損害的雇主責任的研究主要是歸責原則的研究,包括過錯推定責任與無過錯責任,雖然各執(zhí)己見,但大多數(shù)學者支持采用無過錯責任歸責原則。在立法上,對于規(guī)范雇傭關系的法律很長一段時間處于空缺狀態(tài),直到《最高人民法院關于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》的出臺,雇傭關系這一概念才出現(xiàn)在我國法律條文中,但該法第9條規(guī)定與后來頒布的《侵權責任法》第34、35條的規(guī)定,概念和具體內(nèi)容均發(fā)生了變化,導致實踐中對于二者的效力關系以及如何適用存在很大爭議。由于雇傭合同沒有納入《合同法》,造成沒有雇傭合同的相關規(guī)則作為裁判的依據(jù),裁判結果主觀隨意性大導致當事人紛紛上訴,浪費了司法資源。概括來說雇員致第三人損害的雇主責任主要存在雇傭關系無明確的判定標準、從事雇傭活動的范圍不明確、沒有規(guī)定雇主追償權三個主要問題。針對存在的問題,本文立足于我國的立法現(xiàn)狀同時借鑒其他國家關于雇主責任的相關立法,在對雇主責任歸責原則等理論基礎進行研究后,為雇傭關系立法提出可行性的建議,希望能以民法典編纂為契機,完善雇主責任制度。首先,我國有必要將雇傭合同有名化,這一立法構想既有意思自治與民事行為理論做為理論基礎,也有大量雇傭關系亟待法律規(guī)范的現(xiàn)實基礎。在立法模式的選擇上,我國可以借鑒德國關于雇傭合同規(guī)則的立法模式,在《合同法》中規(guī)定雇傭合同的一般規(guī)則,將勞動合同作為特殊規(guī)則加以規(guī)定。其次,在歸責原則的選擇上,我國今后關于雇主責任的立法應當采用無過錯責任原則,不僅可以強化對受害人的保護,也符合我國社會層面與經(jīng)濟層面的基本國情。第三,對于雇傭關系的判定標準可以先采用雇傭合同標準進行判斷,如無法判定進而采用控制監(jiān)督標準。雇傭關系與勞動關系最根本區(qū)別在于勞動關系具有更強的人身從屬性,但并不是所有的雇傭關系都不具有從屬性,二者還需要從主體、報酬給付、價值追求與規(guī)范內(nèi)容等方面進行區(qū)分。雇傭關系與承攬關系最根本區(qū)別在于給付內(nèi)容一個為勞務另一個為勞動成果,此外在控制關系與報酬給付標準方面有所區(qū)別。第四,在認定雇傭關系這一前提下,對于從事雇傭活動的范圍確定,可以以雇主意思為出發(fā)點,結合客觀說與內(nèi)在聯(lián)系說綜合把握。最后,在雇主承擔無過錯責任之后,賦予雇主追償權,根據(jù)雇員對第三人侵權行為的過錯程度確定追償數(shù)額。同時發(fā)展雇主責任保險制度,分散雇主的責任風險。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the improvement of people's living and consumption level, the employment relationship is common, and the dispute of employer's liability is followed. In theory, the study of employer liability for damages caused by employees to the third party is mainly about the principle of liability imputation, including presumption of fault liability and liability without fault, although they hold their own opinions. However, most scholars support the principle of liability imputation without fault. In legislation, the law regulating employment relations has been vacant for a long time until the Supreme people's Court on the trial of personal injury compensation cases applicable to a number of issues of the interpretation of the law, The concept of employment relationship has just appeared in the legal provisions of our country, but the provisions of Article 9 of the Law and the provisions of Article 34- 35 of the Tort liability Law have changed the concept and the concrete contents. In practice, there is a great controversy about the relationship between the effectiveness of the two and how to apply them. Because the employment contract is not included in the contract Law, the relevant rules without the employment contract are taken as the basis of the judgment. The subjective arbitrariness of the judgment result leads the parties to appeal one after another and waste the judicial resources. Generally speaking, there are three main problems in the employer's liability for the damage caused by the employee to the third party: there are no clear criteria for determining the employment relationship, the scope of engaging in employment activities is not clear, and the employer's right of recourse is not stipulated. In view of the existing problems, this paper bases on the current legislative situation of our country and draws lessons from the relevant legislation of other countries on employer liability. After studying the theoretical basis of the principle of liability imputation of employers, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for the legislation of employment relations. It is hoped that the system of employer's liability can be perfected at the turning point of compiling the Civil Code. First of all, it is necessary to make the employment contract famous in our country. This legislative conception is based on the theory of autonomy of will and civil behavior, as well as the realistic basis of a large number of employment relations that need to be regulated by law. With regard to the choice of legislative model, our country can draw lessons from the German legislative model on employment contract rules, stipulate the general rules of employment contract in contract Law, and stipulate the labor contract as a special rule. Secondly, in the choice of imputation principle, the principle of no-fault liability should be adopted in the legislation of employer liability in our country in the future, which can not only strengthen the protection of the victim, but also accord with the basic national conditions of the social and economic level of our country. Thirdly, the standard of employment relationship can be judged by the standard of employment contract, such as the standard of control supervision. The most fundamental difference between employment and labor relations is that labor relations have stronger personal attributes, but not all employment relations do not have subordinate attributes, they also need to be paid from the subject, remuneration, Value pursuit and normative content and other aspects of the distinction. The most fundamental difference between the employment relationship and the contract relationship lies in the fact that the content of payment is one of labor service and the other is the result of labor, in addition, there are differences between the control relationship and the standard of payment of remuneration. Fourthly, under the premise of determining the employment relationship, we can take the employer's intention as the starting point and combine the objective theory with the internal relation theory to comprehensively grasp the scope of engaging in employment activities. Finally, after the employer bears the no-fault liability, the employer is given the right of recourse, and the amount of recovery is determined according to the degree of fault of the employee to the third party. At the same time, the development of employer liability insurance system to spread the employer's liability risk.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923;D923.6
本文編號：2371114
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the improvement of people's living and consumption level, the employment relationship is common, and the dispute of employer's liability is followed. In theory, the study of employer liability for damages caused by employees to the third party is mainly about the principle of liability imputation, including presumption of fault liability and liability without fault, although they hold their own opinions. However, most scholars support the principle of liability imputation without fault. In legislation, the law regulating employment relations has been vacant for a long time until the Supreme people's Court on the trial of personal injury compensation cases applicable to a number of issues of the interpretation of the law, The concept of employment relationship has just appeared in the legal provisions of our country, but the provisions of Article 9 of the Law and the provisions of Article 34- 35 of the Tort liability Law have changed the concept and the concrete contents. In practice, there is a great controversy about the relationship between the effectiveness of the two and how to apply them. Because the employment contract is not included in the contract Law, the relevant rules without the employment contract are taken as the basis of the judgment. The subjective arbitrariness of the judgment result leads the parties to appeal one after another and waste the judicial resources. Generally speaking, there are three main problems in the employer's liability for the damage caused by the employee to the third party: there are no clear criteria for determining the employment relationship, the scope of engaging in employment activities is not clear, and the employer's right of recourse is not stipulated. In view of the existing problems, this paper bases on the current legislative situation of our country and draws lessons from the relevant legislation of other countries on employer liability. After studying the theoretical basis of the principle of liability imputation of employers, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for the legislation of employment relations. It is hoped that the system of employer's liability can be perfected at the turning point of compiling the Civil Code. First of all, it is necessary to make the employment contract famous in our country. This legislative conception is based on the theory of autonomy of will and civil behavior, as well as the realistic basis of a large number of employment relations that need to be regulated by law. With regard to the choice of legislative model, our country can draw lessons from the German legislative model on employment contract rules, stipulate the general rules of employment contract in contract Law, and stipulate the labor contract as a special rule. Secondly, in the choice of imputation principle, the principle of no-fault liability should be adopted in the legislation of employer liability in our country in the future, which can not only strengthen the protection of the victim, but also accord with the basic national conditions of the social and economic level of our country. Thirdly, the standard of employment relationship can be judged by the standard of employment contract, such as the standard of control supervision. The most fundamental difference between employment and labor relations is that labor relations have stronger personal attributes, but not all employment relations do not have subordinate attributes, they also need to be paid from the subject, remuneration, Value pursuit and normative content and other aspects of the distinction. The most fundamental difference between the employment relationship and the contract relationship lies in the fact that the content of payment is one of labor service and the other is the result of labor, in addition, there are differences between the control relationship and the standard of payment of remuneration. Fourthly, under the premise of determining the employment relationship, we can take the employer's intention as the starting point and combine the objective theory with the internal relation theory to comprehensively grasp the scope of engaging in employment activities. Finally, after the employer bears the no-fault liability, the employer is given the right of recourse, and the amount of recovery is determined according to the degree of fault of the employee to the third party. At the same time, the development of employer liability insurance system to spread the employer's liability risk.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923;D923.6
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李文濤;龍翼飛;;雇主責任類型化與“雇傭期間”的認定規(guī)則[J];中國人力資源開發(fā);2010年01期
2 王國鋒;有關雇主責任的幾個問題[J];政府法制;2001年01期
3 鄭宇;;論雇主責任的歸責原則[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2006年06期
4 張靜;;論雇主責任[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2007年07期
5 馬寧;;雇主責任保險在我國的價值定位[J];法制與社會;2007年06期
6 楊建華;;雇主責任的本質與雇主責任的歸責原則[J];法制與社會;2007年09期
7 張友連;朱晨;;論雇主責任的理論基礎[J];中國勞動關系學院學報;2008年01期
8 耿天瑜;;雇主責任構成要件[J];河北能源職業(yè)技術學院學報;2008年02期
9 王磊;;淺析雇主責任中的相關問題[J];山東審判;2008年04期
10 劉記福;;關于完善我國雇主責任制度的思考[J];政治與法律;2008年08期
相關重要報紙文章 前10條
1 肖增羿 陳 希;雇主責任險如何走出困境[N];證券日報;2004年
2 吳紅軍;煤礦雇主責任險發(fā)展步履沉重[N];中國煤炭報;2004年
3 記者 盧懷謙;全面推廣煤礦雇主責任保險[N];中國證券報;2004年
4 夏慶軍;戴鳳舉 強制性推廣煤礦雇主責任保險[N];金融時報;2004年
5 本報記者 吳紅軍;煤礦雇主責任險發(fā)展任重道遠[N];金融時報;2004年
6 中央財經(jīng)大學保險系 陳巖;雇主責任險任重道遠[N];上海金融報;2004年
7 本報記者 謝柳;雇主責任險：非強制難施行[N];中國保險報;2006年
8 謝柳;雇主責任險：非強制難施行[N];經(jīng)理日報;2006年
9 本報記者 高和平;用工荒催緊雇主責任險[N];華夏時報;2011年
10 本報記者 劉微;招工難催熱雇主責任險[N];消費日報;2011年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 李妍;職場性騷擾雇主責任研究[D];吉林大學;2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 劉強;雇主責任研究[D];山東大學;2009年
2 沙亮亮;雇主責任研究[D];西南政法大學;2007年
3 楊健;論我國雇主責任的立法完善[D];上海交通大學;2011年
4 楊妍;用人單位侵權責任問題研究[D];鄭州大學;2015年
5 唐曉薇;勞務派遣中的雇主責任研究[D];重慶大學;2015年
6 彭巧優(yōu);我國勞務派遣雇主責任研究[D];湘潭大學;2015年
7 傅立亞;防治職場性騷擾的法律思考[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學;2015年
8 張德銘;雇主責任研究[D];西南政法大學;2014年
9 胡夢迪;我國雇主責任制度研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年
10 趙靜;雇員侵權的雇主責任研究[D];新疆大學;2016年
，本文編號：2371114
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2371114.html
