合同中的信賴?yán)娓拍钐轿?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-09 17:44
【摘要】：信賴?yán)孢@一法律概念普遍存在于大陸法系和英美法系合同損害賠償領(lǐng)域,大陸法系中的信賴?yán)嬷饕诤贤瑹o效被撤銷,一方承擔(dān)締約過失責(zé)任的情況下用做賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。英美法系的信賴?yán)鎰t是主要存在于違約損害賠償中,作為計算被違約方損失標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的一種。在我國,對于信賴?yán)娴母拍畋旧砣匀淮嬖诤芏酄幾h,這主要集中在三個方面,第一是信賴?yán)娴膬?nèi)涵,第二是信賴?yán)媸欠翊嬖谟谟行Ш贤?第三是信賴?yán)媾c合同損害賠償中的其他利益,即返還利益與期待利益的關(guān)系。本文即圍繞合同中的信賴?yán)娴母拍钪械娜齻�問題展開,分成三個部分：本文第一部分是關(guān)于信賴?yán)鎯?nèi)涵的探討。大陸法系對于信賴?yán)鎯?nèi)涵主要觀點可以分為兩類,即以王澤鑒先生的觀點為代表的損失說與以崔健遠(yuǎn)教授的觀點為代表利益說,有學(xué)者基于對這些學(xué)說的比較與研究進(jìn)一步提出了固有利益說、代價說等學(xué)說。英美法系現(xiàn)今對于信賴?yán)鎯?nèi)涵的定義已經(jīng)比較成熟,普遍認(rèn)為信賴?yán)媸且环疆?dāng)事人“基于合約的花費(fèi)”。本文基于對以上信賴?yán)鎸W(xué)說的比較和分析,歸納了信賴?yán)娴奶卣?并得出自己的觀點。本文認(rèn)為信賴?yán)媸且砸环N成本,它是當(dāng)事人在訂約、履約過程中為了獲得合約的期待利益而花費(fèi)的成本。本文第二部分本文希望通過探討信賴?yán)媾c締約過失責(zé)任之間的關(guān)系得出兩個結(jié)論：第一,締約過失責(zé)任制度并不只保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的信賴?yán)妫坏诙?信賴?yán)嬉膊粌H僅有締約過失責(zé)任制度保護(hù),也由違約責(zé)任保護(hù)。本文通過歸納大陸法系各國以及我國對于締約過失責(zé)任在立法上和學(xué)理上的定義得出,現(xiàn)今的締約過失責(zé)任并不要求損害賠償與合同的成立有效一定有密切的關(guān)系,這使得締約階段產(chǎn)生的一些基于當(dāng)事人人身財產(chǎn)權(quán)利受到侵害的賠償請求也由締約過失責(zé)任制度保護(hù)。得出締約過失責(zé)任保護(hù)的不僅僅是締約階段的信賴?yán)妗＝酉聛肀疚牧信e了關(guān)于違約責(zé)任下是否存在信賴?yán)尜r償請求這一問題的一些觀點,基于這些觀點,本文提出了自己的見解,即合同的履行階段同樣存在信賴?yán)?合同的不履行將導(dǎo)致守約方信賴?yán)鎿p害,產(chǎn)生違約責(zé)任。本文第三部分主要探討了信賴?yán)婧头颠�利益,期待利益的關(guān)系。本文討論了傳統(tǒng)意義上的返還利益與現(xiàn)今英美法上的返還利益。得出,傳統(tǒng)定義上返還利益屬于信賴?yán)娴奶乩?而現(xiàn)今的返還利益已經(jīng)超過了信賴?yán)娴姆懂牎＝酉聛?本文主要論述期待利益與信賴?yán)娴年P(guān)系。本文比較了大陸法系的履行利益和英美法系的期待利益,得出這兩個概念差別不大,因此討論信賴?yán)婧推诖娴年P(guān)系,對于我國這樣一個偏向于大陸法系的國家也是有意義的。之后,本文通過分析富勒在其文章中提到的關(guān)于信賴?yán)媾c期待利益提供近乎相同賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的三種情況,來明確期待利益的一些概念。之后,本文對于期待利益與信賴?yán)孢M(jìn)行了比較,說明在很多情況下,期待利益并不一定大于信賴?yán)�。在本章的最�?本文論述了違約損害賠償中期待利益損害賠償與信賴?yán)鎿p害賠償所存在的競合關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The legal concept of the trust benefit is common in the contract damages of the continental law system and the common law system, and the trust benefit in the continental law system is mainly used as the compensation standard in the case of the failure of the contract and the party's fault liability. The trust benefit of the Anglo-American law system is mainly in the damages for breach of contract, as one of the criteria for calculating the loss of the breaching party. In our country, there are still many disputes in the concept of the trust benefit, which is mainly focused on the three aspects, the first is the connotation of the trust benefit, the second is whether the trust benefit exists in the effective contract, the third is the trust benefit and other benefits in the contract damages, namely, the relationship between the return benefit and the expected benefit. In this paper, three problems in the concept of the trust benefit in the contract are expanded and divided into three parts: the first part of this paper is the discussion on the connotation of the trust benefit. in that civil law system, the main point of view on the connotation of the trust benefit can be divided into two categories, namely, the loss of the representative from the point of view of Mr. Wang, and the point of view of professor Cui Jian far as the representative, and some scholars have further put forward the inherent benefit theory based on the comparison and study of these theories, At the cost of the theory. The common law system is mature in the definition of the connotation of the trust interest, and it is widely believed that the trust benefit is one of the parties' 鈥渃ontract-based cost鈥，
本文編號：2321121
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2321121.html
[Abstract]:The legal concept of the trust benefit is common in the contract damages of the continental law system and the common law system, and the trust benefit in the continental law system is mainly used as the compensation standard in the case of the failure of the contract and the party's fault liability. The trust benefit of the Anglo-American law system is mainly in the damages for breach of contract, as one of the criteria for calculating the loss of the breaching party. In our country, there are still many disputes in the concept of the trust benefit, which is mainly focused on the three aspects, the first is the connotation of the trust benefit, the second is whether the trust benefit exists in the effective contract, the third is the trust benefit and other benefits in the contract damages, namely, the relationship between the return benefit and the expected benefit. In this paper, three problems in the concept of the trust benefit in the contract are expanded and divided into three parts: the first part of this paper is the discussion on the connotation of the trust benefit. in that civil law system, the main point of view on the connotation of the trust benefit can be divided into two categories, namely, the loss of the representative from the point of view of Mr. Wang, and the point of view of professor Cui Jian far as the representative, and some scholars have further put forward the inherent benefit theory based on the comparison and study of these theories, At the cost of the theory. The common law system is mature in the definition of the connotation of the trust interest, and it is widely believed that the trust benefit is one of the parties' 鈥渃ontract-based cost鈥，
本文編號：2321121
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2321121.html
最近更新
教材專著
