【摘要】：言論自由是公民自由自主的發(fā)表言論、表達(dá)思想、主張、見解和觀點(diǎn)的重要權(quán)利,是公民實(shí)現(xiàn)自我價(jià)值、參與社會(huì)管理的重要表達(dá),是公民享有其他權(quán)利和自由的前提和基礎(chǔ)�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展,使公民言論自由的行使有了更加暢通的渠道和廣闊的平臺(tái)空間,各種新興媒體尤其是自媒體的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展也為公民的主體性表達(dá)提供了更多的可能和更廣闊的空間。隱私權(quán)是公民個(gè)人獨(dú)處的權(quán)利,強(qiáng)調(diào)維護(hù)公民個(gè)人私生活不受打擾,個(gè)人空間不受侵犯�，F(xiàn)代文明社會(huì)的發(fā)展使公民越來越重視個(gè)人空間的享有和個(gè)人私密的維護(hù)。傳播媒介的興盛和網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界的發(fā)展使公民能夠進(jìn)行越來越廣泛的言論表達(dá),與此同時(shí),公民隱私越來越無(wú)處可藏。這就不可避免的產(chǎn)生言論自由和隱私權(quán)之間的沖突。言論自由和隱私權(quán)都是憲法上的基本價(jià)值,在構(gòu)建公民完整人格、促進(jìn)社會(huì)文明和社會(huì)進(jìn)步方面都發(fā)揮著重要的積極作用。在解決言論自由和隱私權(quán)之間沖突時(shí),不應(yīng)簡(jiǎn)單的作出非此即彼的取舍,而應(yīng)當(dāng)慎重地進(jìn)行價(jià)值選擇和利益衡量。目前,對(duì)于言論自由和隱私權(quán)沖突的解決機(jī)制我國(guó)法律對(duì)此尚無(wú)明確規(guī)定,法學(xué)理論界也為達(dá)成一致看法。筆者對(duì)言論、言論自由和隱私、隱私權(quán)等相關(guān)概念和理論的歷史和學(xué)理演進(jìn)進(jìn)行了梳理,以期達(dá)到正確認(rèn)識(shí)和界定相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵的目的,明確了言論自由和隱私權(quán)的權(quán)利位階、權(quán)利價(jià)值和權(quán)利范圍等問題。隨后,筆者結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐和學(xué)界現(xiàn)有研究,總結(jié)出了言論自由和隱私權(quán)二者之間沖突的表現(xiàn)、原因等等問題。美國(guó)和德國(guó)是世界上對(duì)言論自由和隱私權(quán)的沖突解決比較成熟的國(guó)家,由于不同的歷史文化背景和法律傳統(tǒng),兩國(guó)在解決二者沖突時(shí)發(fā)展出了不同的規(guī)制原則和解決機(jī)制。本文在結(jié)合具體案例對(duì)德國(guó)、美國(guó)等國(guó)關(guān)于言論自由與隱私權(quán)沖突解決的相關(guān)制度和原則進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)介紹的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)立法和司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行的分析,希冀根據(jù)我國(guó)具體的實(shí)際情況,探索出符合我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情的二者沖突的解決模式。
[Abstract]:Freedom of speech is an important right for citizens to express their opinions, ideas, opinions and opinions freely and autonomously. It is also an important expression for citizens to realize their own value and participate in social management. It is also the premise and basis for citizens to enjoy other rights and freedoms. With the development of Internet information technology, the exercise of citizens' freedom of speech has more unimpeded channels and broad platform space. The emergence and development of various new media, especially the self-media, also provide more possibilities and wider space for citizens to express their subjectivity. The right to privacy is the right of individual privacy, which emphasizes the protection of private life of citizens and the inviolability of personal space. With the development of modern civil society, citizens pay more and more attention to the enjoyment of personal space and the maintenance of personal privacy. The prosperity of the media and the development of the network world enable citizens to express more and more widely, at the same time, the privacy of citizens is more and more nowhere to hide. This inevitably creates a conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. The freedom of speech and the right to privacy are the basic values of the Constitution and play an important and positive role in the construction of the citizen's complete personality and the promotion of social civilization and progress. In resolving the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, we should not simply choose one or the other, but carefully choose value and weigh interests. At present, there is no clear stipulation on the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, and the legal theorists agree. The author combs the historical and theoretical evolution of related concepts and theories, such as speech, freedom of speech, privacy, privacy and so on, in order to achieve the purpose of correctly understanding and defining the connotation of relevant concepts. The rights rank, value and scope of the right to freedom of speech and privacy are clarified. Then, the author summarizes the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, reasons and so on. The United States and Germany are the mature countries in the world to resolve the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. Due to different historical and cultural backgrounds and legal traditions, the two countries have developed different regulatory principles and settlement mechanisms in resolving the conflict. Based on the systematic introduction of the relevant systems and principles of conflict resolution between freedom of speech and privacy in Germany, the United States and other countries, this paper analyzes the relevant legislation and judicial practice in China. It is hoped that, according to the actual situation of our country, the solution mode of the conflict between the two should be explored according to the actual situation of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蘇力;《秋菊打官司》案、邱氏鼠藥案和言論自由[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年03期

2 張翔;基本權(quán)利的雙重性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年03期

3 張紅;;20世紀(jì)德國(guó)人格權(quán)法的演進(jìn)[J];清華法律評(píng)論;2009年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2272551