【摘要】：隱私權(quán)的出現(xiàn)是為了保護(hù)個(gè)人的獨(dú)處和生活的安寧,保障個(gè)人的自由、幸福與尊嚴(yán)。隱私權(quán)的內(nèi)涵不斷擴(kuò)張,隨著信息技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展,隱私權(quán)更加強(qiáng)調(diào)個(gè)人對(duì)自我信息的控制,信息隱私亦成為隱私權(quán)的最重要內(nèi)容。大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代最明顯地表現(xiàn)為對(duì)海量數(shù)據(jù)的掌握與分析,政府、商業(yè)組織和個(gè)人對(duì)大量信息的搜集、利用、處理,使得個(gè)人被“透明化”。隱私權(quán)被侵犯呈現(xiàn)出新的特征,集中表現(xiàn)為侵犯隱私權(quán)行為主體的不斷拓展、侵犯隱私權(quán)行為方式的轉(zhuǎn)變、侵犯隱私權(quán)行為客體的延伸和侵犯隱私權(quán)行為后果的加重。在大數(shù)據(jù)背景下,隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的重點(diǎn)是對(duì)個(gè)人信息的保護(hù)。文章通過比較目前世界上對(duì)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)較為成功的美國和歐盟的立法模式,分析出在大數(shù)據(jù)背景下我國個(gè)人信息保護(hù)立法應(yīng)該堅(jiān)持歐盟公私合一的模式,將政府、商業(yè)組織和個(gè)人都納入法律規(guī)制之中,制定出一部專門的個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法。提出在進(jìn)行個(gè)人信息保護(hù)專門立法時(shí),首先要明確個(gè)人信息的內(nèi)涵,對(duì)個(gè)人信息進(jìn)行全面的保護(hù),堅(jiān)持目的性原則,明確信息隱私的保護(hù)處于優(yōu)先地位,堅(jiān)持比例性原則,明確個(gè)人信息處理的范圍、程度和方式,始終尊重個(gè)人對(duì)信息的主動(dòng)性與自決性,貫徹“告知后同意”原則對(duì)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的重要意義。
[Abstract]:The emergence of privacy is to protect personal solitude and peace of life, to protect personal freedom, happiness and dignity. With the development of information technology, the right of privacy emphasizes the individual's control of self-information, and information privacy becomes the most important content of the right of privacy. The most obvious manifestation of big data's era is the mastery and analysis of massive data, the collection, utilization and processing of a large amount of information by governments, commercial organizations and individuals, which makes individuals "transparent". The infringement of the right to privacy presents new characteristics, which mainly shows the constant expansion of the subject of the violation of the right to privacy, the transformation of the behavior mode of the infringement of the right to privacy, the extension of the object of the act of infringing the right to privacy and the aggravation of the consequence of the act of infringing the right of privacy. Under the background of big data, the protection of privacy is focused on the protection of personal information. By comparing the current legislative models of the United States and the European Union, which are relatively successful in the protection of personal information in the world, the article analyzes that under the background of big data, our personal information protection legislation should adhere to the EU model of public and private integration, and bring the government together. Commercial organizations and individuals are brought into the legal regulation, a special personal information protection law. It is put forward that in the special legislation of personal information protection, the connotation of personal information should be defined, the personal information should be fully protected, the principle of purpose should be adhered to, the protection of information privacy should be given priority, and the principle of proportionality should be adhered to. The scope, degree and method of personal information processing are defined, the initiative and self-determination of individual information are always respected, and the importance of implementing the principle of "consent after informing" to the protection of personal information.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王利明;;論個(gè)人信息權(quán)的法律保護(hù)——以個(gè)人信息權(quán)與隱私權(quán)的界分為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2013年04期

2 洪海林;;個(gè)人信息保護(hù)立法理念探究——在信息保護(hù)與信息流通之間[J];河北法學(xué);2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2211265