本文選題：工傷保險(xiǎn)補(bǔ)償 + 侵權(quán)賠償　； 參考：《東南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)工傷事故發(fā)生后,職工的人身權(quán)利和勞動(dòng)能力受到侵害時(shí),如何快速全面地救濟(jì)、保障職工的權(quán)益是立法者和實(shí)踐者著重考慮的問題。然而認(rèn)識(shí)上的差異,導(dǎo)致在立法理論和審判實(shí)踐中對(duì)工傷事故的救濟(jì)存在不同的處理方式,由此便產(chǎn)生了救濟(jì)模式的不同�！绰毠ぐl(fā)生工傷,可主張工傷保險(xiǎn)待遇給付,或請(qǐng)求侵權(quán)損害賠償,也可同時(shí)主張工傷保險(xiǎn)待遇給付和侵權(quán)損害賠償。但在目前侵權(quán)引發(fā)工傷保險(xiǎn)與民事侵權(quán)的法律競合問題,因所依據(jù)的法律基礎(chǔ)和救濟(jì)途徑不同。認(rèn)為,兩種請(qǐng)求權(quán)的權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)和歸責(zé)原則不同,工傷賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)是勞動(dòng)者因發(fā)生工傷事故獲得的一種社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)利益,工傷保險(xiǎn)損害賠償實(shí)行無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則,有社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)性質(zhì)；而第三人侵權(quán)損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)是勞動(dòng)者因第三人侵權(quán)致害而取得,侵權(quán)損害賠償實(shí)行的是民法的填平原則、過錯(cuò)原則和過失相抵原則,侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)膿p失包括財(cái)產(chǎn)性損失及非財(cái)產(chǎn)性損失,其性質(zhì)屬于私法領(lǐng)域的賠償2。在理論上爭論不休,立法中又未對(duì)這一問題做出明確規(guī)定,司法實(shí)踐中更是各行其是。為妥善處理目前工傷保險(xiǎn)補(bǔ)償與侵權(quán)損害賠償競合案件,很有必要梳理目前存在矛盾或不合時(shí)宜的法律法規(guī),整合適用模式,理順處理機(jī)制,最終達(dá)到在處理工傷保險(xiǎn)補(bǔ)償與侵權(quán)損害賠償競合案件時(shí)有法可依、有章可循,使得處理該類案件快捷高效,減輕訴累,盡可能保障當(dāng)事人的權(quán)益；同時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)兼顧公平、責(zé)任原則。3本文以三個(gè)現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中發(fā)生的案例為切入口,分析我國工傷保險(xiǎn)和侵權(quán)損害賠償竟合處理的立法現(xiàn)狀,比較競合的各種適用模式,探討工傷事故的侵權(quán)責(zé)任主體、過錯(cuò)責(zé)任及目前特殊用工形式、特殊群體的不同而選擇不同適用模式,為目前司法實(shí)踐中處理該類案件提供一定的參考。
[Abstract]:When the workers' personal rights and labor ability are infringed upon after the accident, how to relieve the workers quickly and comprehensively, and how to protect the workers' rights and interests is a problem that legislators and practitioners pay more attention to. However, the difference in cognition leads to different ways of dealing with the relief of industrial accidents in the legislative theory and the trial practice, which leads to different relief modes. Namely worker inductrial injury, can advocate inductrial injury insurance treatment pay, or request tort damage compensation, also can advocate inductrial injury insurance treatment pay and tort damage compensation. However, at present, the problem of legal concurrence between industrial injury insurance and civil tort is caused by tort, because of the different legal basis and remedies. The author holds that the right basis and imputation principle of the two claims are different. The basis of claim for industrial injury compensation is a kind of social insurance benefit obtained by the laborer as a result of the industrial injury accident, and the principle of no-fault liability is applied in the compensation for injury insurance damage. The third party has the nature of social insurance, and the right of claim for tort damages of the third party is based on the principle of filling in the civil law, the principle of fault and the principle of fault offset, which is obtained by the third party because of the damage caused by the infringement of the third party. The loss of tort damages includes property loss and non-property loss, and its nature belongs to the compensation in the field of private law. There is no clear stipulation on this issue in the legislation, especially in judicial practice. In order to properly deal with the current cases of compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for infringement damages, it is necessary to sort out the existing contradictions or outdated laws and regulations, integrate applicable models, and rationalize the handling mechanism. Finally, there are laws to be followed and rules to be followed when dealing with the cases of compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for infringement damages, so that the handling of such cases is fast and efficient, reducing the burden of litigation, and protecting the rights and interests of the parties as much as possible; at the same time, it should take into account the fairness of the cases. Taking three real life cases as the entry point, this paper analyzes the current legislative situation of industrial injury insurance and compensation for tort damages in China, compares various applicable modes, and probes into the subject of tort liability for industrial accidents. The fault liability and the current special employment form, the special group's choice different suitable mode, provides the certain reference for the present judicial practice processing this kind of case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923
，

本文編號(hào)：2094803