本文選題：附保護第三人作用契約 + 純粹經(jīng)濟損失��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：契約相對性原則自羅馬法以來便為兩大法系所尊崇,但隨著社會的發(fā)展,該原則在實踐中已漸漸顯露其不足之處,于是各種突破契約相對性原則的制度相繼產(chǎn)生。德國法上由判例發(fā)展而來的附保護第三人作用契約是挑戰(zhàn)契約相對性原則的又一例證,其為了保護與契約有特殊關(guān)系的第三人而創(chuàng)立,對契約僅在當(dāng)事人之間發(fā)生權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系的原則做出了修正,使其具備了保護契約外第三人的作用。本文擬以法理分析、借鑒附保護第三人作用契約的必要性、比較法分析及構(gòu)建我國附保護第三人作用契約的立法建議為總體思路。首先指出該契約的法理基礎(chǔ)為依據(jù)誠信原則的附隨義務(wù)。其次進一步分析借鑒該契約具有司法實踐與理論上的必要性,前者分析了我國司法實踐中處理該類案件時存在的各種問題,并指出附保護第三人作用契約能夠解決這些問題,后者分析了該契約有利于合同相對性原則的發(fā)展、彌補為第三人利益契約對第三人權(quán)益保護的不足以及違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任發(fā)揮各自的制度優(yōu)勢。最后在借鑒國外立法及判例的基礎(chǔ)上,對如何構(gòu)建我國附保護第三人作用契約提出立法建議,包括構(gòu)成要件、適用的契約類型、契約階段等一般法律問題的論述,同時也對請求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)、相關(guān)訴訟問題等較特殊的法律問題進行了研究并得出結(jié)論,以期更好的保護第三人權(quán)益以及彌補我國法律對專業(yè)人士對第三人的民事責(zé)任規(guī)定的不足。
[Abstract]:The principle of relativity of contract has been respected by the two legal systems since Roman law. However, with the development of society, the principle has gradually revealed its shortcomings in practice, so various systems of breaking through the principle of relativity of contract have emerged one after another. The contract of the role of the third party, which is developed from the case law in Germany, is another example of challenging the principle of relativity of contract, which was founded to protect the third party with a special relationship with the contract. The principle that the contract only takes place between the parties is amended to protect the third party outside the contract. This article intends to use the necessity of the contract of the third party as a reference, and the comparative law to analyze and construct the legislative suggestion of the contract of the role of the third party with the protection of the third party in our country. Firstly, it points out that the legal basis of the contract is the collateral obligation based on the principle of good faith. Secondly, the author further analyzes the necessity of using the contract for reference in judicial practice and theory. The former analyzes the problems existing in handling such cases in the judicial practice of our country, and points out that the contract of protecting the third party can solve these problems. The latter analyzes that the contract is beneficial to the development of the principle of relativity of contract, and makes up for the deficiency of the protection of the rights and interests of the third party under the contract of interests of the third party and the exertion of their respective institutional advantages in the liability for breach of contract and the liability for tort. Finally, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign legislations and precedents, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on how to construct the contract of the role of the third party attached to the protection of the third party in our country, including the constitutive elements, the type of contract applicable, the stage of contract, and other general legal issues. At the same time, the author also studies and draws a conclusion about the special legal problems, such as the basis of claim right and the related litigation issues, in order to better protect the rights and interests of the third party and make up for the deficiency of the civil liability of the professional person to the third party in our country's law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D913

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邵建東;論德國民法中附保護第三人效力的合同[J];比較法研究;1996年03期

2 申黎,尹志君;試論引進“附保護第三人作用之契約”理論的必要性[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年04期

3 王逸寒,盧文道;輸血感染丙肝賠償糾紛案中的疑難法律問題探析[J];法學(xué);1999年06期

4 王海英;;利益第三人合同與附保護第三人作用合同之辨析[J];法制與社會;2009年24期

5 盧子亮;純粹經(jīng)濟損失初探[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期

6 邱雪梅;;論附保護第三人作用合同——兼談我國民法典編纂中民事責(zé)任體系的構(gòu)建[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2006年01期

7 陳樹森,曲虹妍;附保護第三人作用契約的制度價值與制度移植[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年05期

8 趙清新;;論附保護第三人作用的合同[J];法律適用;2013年03期

9 秦黨親;舒勝;;試論我國純經(jīng)濟損失立法保護的不足與完善——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》為視角[J];法制與社會;2014年04期

10 涂文,安翱;論附保護第三人作用的契約[J];河北法學(xué);2004年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 高雅麗;[N];人民法院報;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 段向威;論美國U.C.C.中的利益第三人擔(dān)保責(zé)任[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

2 鄭香今;論我國專家責(zé)任制度的法律構(gòu)建[D];延邊大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2069347