本文選題：職務(wù)發(fā)明 + 權(quán)屬規(guī)則　； 參考：《電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年09期

【摘要】：日本《特許法》第35條規(guī)定了關(guān)于職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)利歸屬的相關(guān)規(guī)則,在1921年和2015年兩次《特許法》修訂中,實(shí)現(xiàn)了由"雇主優(yōu)先"到"雇員優(yōu)先",再到"折衷主義"的轉(zhuǎn)變,分別彰顯了保障雇員發(fā)明人合法權(quán)益和促進(jìn)發(fā)明成果轉(zhuǎn)化運(yùn)用的立法價(jià)值取向。我國職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)屬規(guī)則隨著1984年《專利法》的頒布而產(chǎn)生,運(yùn)行中存在雇員與雇主之間權(quán)利配置不均衡等諸多問題,因此,有必要借鑒日本的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),從法定規(guī)則的改進(jìn)和完善及約定規(guī)則的擴(kuò)張和限制兩個(gè)方面提出應(yīng)對舉措。
[Abstract]:Article 35 of Japan's franchise Law stipulates the relevant rules concerning the attribution of the right to invention for duty. In the 1921 and 2015 amendments to the concession Law, the transition from "employer first" to "employee first" and then to "eclecticism" was realized. It shows the legislative value orientation of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of employee inventors and promoting the transformation and application of inventions. With the promulgation of the Patent Law in 1984, there are many problems in the distribution of rights between employees and employers. Therefore, it is necessary to learn from the legislative experience of Japan. The countermeasures are put forward from the aspects of the improvement and perfection of the statutory rules and the expansion and limitation of the prescribed rules.
【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)研究中心;
【分類號】：D931.3;DD913
，

本文編號：1987909