本文選題：表演者權(quán)視聽作品 + 權(quán)利歸屬��； 參考：《中國(guó)版權(quán)》2015年06期

【摘要】：我國(guó)著作權(quán)法并未明確表演者對(duì)其在視聽作品中的表演是否享有獨(dú)立表演者權(quán),但結(jié)合電影類作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度設(shè)計(jì)的宗旨和著作權(quán)法關(guān)于表演者權(quán)的具體規(guī)定,在電影類作品的著作權(quán)賦予制片者享有和行使的規(guī)則下,可以確定表演者除有權(quán)表明身份及保護(hù)形象不受歪曲外,對(duì)其在視聽作品中的表演不享有獨(dú)立的表演者權(quán),制片者對(duì)視聽作品的整體使用無(wú)需征得表演者的許可。
[Abstract]:China's copyright law does not make it clear whether performers enjoy the right of independent performers for their performances in audiovisual works, but combines the purpose of the design of copyright ownership system of film works and the specific provisions of copyright law on performers' rights. Subject to the rules which copyright in film works confer on producers to enjoy and exercise, it can be ascertained that a performer does not have an independent performer's right to perform in audiovisual works, except for the right to manifest his identity and to protect his image from distortion, The producer does not require permission from the performer for the overall use of the audiovisual work.
【作者單位】： 北京市高級(jí)人民法院;
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 楊筱;;美國(guó)雇員發(fā)明制度解析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年09期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1983163