本文選題：消費(fèi)者 + 加倍賠償��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度在我國(guó)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)領(lǐng)域中具有重要地位,發(fā)揮著抑制潛在違法行為,維持社會(huì)整體經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的功能。從1994年初次引進(jìn)起,消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度所面臨的爭(zhēng)議便不絕如縷,這些爭(zhēng)議主要圍繞加倍賠償制度的性質(zhì)、合理性、加倍賠償金額的確定、配套政策的實(shí)施等問(wèn)題�！断M(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》修改時(shí),加倍賠償制度取得一定程度的變革,但未形成突破性進(jìn)展,由此造成消費(fèi)者在行使加倍賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)時(shí)面臨諸多問(wèn)題。在依法治國(guó)深度推進(jìn),經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展謀求新常態(tài)的今天,加深對(duì)可以倒逼市場(chǎng)信用體系建設(shè)的消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的研究很有必要。對(duì)于消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的研究,首先應(yīng)當(dāng)從其一般理論出發(fā),對(duì)其在古代時(shí)期、中世紀(jì)時(shí)期和近代時(shí)期的不同發(fā)展進(jìn)程作以分析,辨明適當(dāng)?shù)姆筛拍?分析其法律屬性、制度價(jià)值和理論基礎(chǔ),以為整篇論述打好鋪墊。請(qǐng)求權(quán)分析涉及法律條文的規(guī)范性和適用效果,是臺(tái)灣學(xué)者王澤鑒推崇的民法思維方法。通過(guò)對(duì)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度中消費(fèi)者的請(qǐng)求權(quán)以及經(jīng)營(yíng)者的抗辯進(jìn)行分析,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)法律條文在適用中存在消費(fèi)者定義不清、欺詐認(rèn)定依據(jù)不協(xié)調(diào)、加倍賠償金收效甚微等問(wèn)題。對(duì)于這些問(wèn)題的解決,需要借鑒域外消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的近況,在對(duì)域外制度闡述的基礎(chǔ)上,得出對(duì)我國(guó)制度建設(shè)的啟示。在完善我國(guó)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度方面,應(yīng)當(dāng)從內(nèi)容和路徑兩方面著手,在內(nèi)容上應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)“生活消費(fèi)需要”作擴(kuò)大解釋、完善欺詐認(rèn)定規(guī)范、合理設(shè)置加倍賠償金,在路徑選擇上應(yīng)當(dāng)追求立法的協(xié)調(diào)性、司法解釋的具體性以及案例指導(dǎo)制度的實(shí)用性�；谶@樣的思路,本文通過(guò)比較分析方法、歷史研究方法、請(qǐng)求權(quán)分析路徑,首先對(duì)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的歷史淵源、法律屬性、法律價(jià)值、理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行論述;其次,對(duì)我國(guó)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的沿革進(jìn)行介紹,對(duì)其中存在的問(wèn)題,尤其是在請(qǐng)求權(quán)規(guī)范中存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析;然后,通過(guò)對(duì)域外消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的介紹與分析,得出對(duì)我國(guó)制度建設(shè)的啟示;最后綜合論述,對(duì)我國(guó)消費(fèi)者保護(hù)加倍賠償制度的完善提出內(nèi)容和路徑方面的建議。
[Abstract]:The system of double compensation for consumer protection plays an important role in the field of consumer protection in China. It plays the role of restraining potential illegal behavior and maintaining the economic interests of society as a whole. Since its first introduction in 1994, there have been numerous disputes over the system of double compensation for consumer protection. These disputes mainly revolve around the nature, rationality and determination of the amount of double compensation. When the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and interests is amended, the double compensation system has made a certain degree of change, but no breakthrough has been formed, which makes consumers face many problems in exercising the right to double compensation. With the advancement of governing the country according to law and the seeking of a new normal for economic development, it is necessary to deepen the research on the system of double compensation for consumer protection which can force the construction of market credit system. To study the system of double compensation for consumer protection, we should first of all start from its general theory, analyze its different development process in ancient period, medieval period and modern period, and distinguish the proper legal concept. Analyze its legal attribute, system value and theoretical basis, lay the groundwork for the whole discussion. The analysis of the right of claim involves the normative and applicable effect of the legal provisions and is the thinking method of civil law advocated by Wang Ze-jian, a Taiwanese scholar. Through the analysis of the consumers' claim right and the operator's defense in the system of double compensation for consumer protection, we can find that the definition of consumer is not clear in the application of the legal provisions of our country, and the basis of fraud identification is not coordinated. Double the amount of compensation has little effect and so on. To solve these problems, we need to draw lessons from the recent situation of the system of double compensation for consumer protection abroad, and draw inspiration to the construction of our country's system on the basis of expounding the extraterritorial system. In perfecting the system of double compensation for consumer protection in our country, we should start from two aspects: content and path. In terms of content, we should expand the explanation of "living consumption needs", perfect the criterion of fraud identification, and reasonably set up double compensation. We should pursue the coordination of legislation, the concreteness of judicial interpretation and the practicability of case guidance system. Based on this way of thinking, this paper discusses the historical origin, legal attributes, legal value and theoretical basis of the system of double compensation for consumer protection through comparative analysis methods, historical research methods, and the path of claim analysis. This paper introduces the evolution of the system of double compensation for consumer protection in China, analyzes the existing problems, especially in the norms of the right of claim, and then, through the introduction and analysis of the system of double compensation for consumer protection abroad, Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of double compensation for consumer protection in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王利明;美國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 田振洪;;論唐律中的“倍備”處罰原則[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 梁慧星（中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員）;[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1958820