本文選題：個人信息 + 網(wǎng)絡侵權��； 參考：《中國青年政治學院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：信息產業(yè)的發(fā)展使每個人的生活都與網(wǎng)絡息息相關,然而人們在利用網(wǎng)絡自由發(fā)表言論、購買商品、瀏覽信息時,個人信息受到侵害的現(xiàn)狀卻不容小覷。網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下的個人信息權侵權是指侵權人利用網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境對可直接或間接識別的自然人的信息進行不當?shù)墨@取、公開、篡改和買賣等行為,侵害了信息主體的控制和利用信息的權利。個人信息涵蓋了包括姓名、肖像、名譽、隱私等人格利益以及因為其所具有使用價值和交換價值而產生的財產利益,因此個人信息既具有人之所以為人的人格利益也具有可以進行交易的商業(yè)價值,極具保護價值。由于網(wǎng)絡自身的特性,使得侵害個人信息權在傳播的廣度、速度以及受侵害的影響深度上都具有與傳統(tǒng)侵權所無法比擬的特性,因此應當予以重視。現(xiàn)階段我國沒有關于個人信息保護的專門立法,也缺乏專門的網(wǎng)絡基本法,對于個人信息權網(wǎng)絡侵權的問題散見于各類法律法規(guī)和司法解釋之中,此對個人信息權網(wǎng)絡侵權的認定和救濟提出了挑戰(zhàn)。本文以最高法發(fā)布的典型案例和網(wǎng)絡上搜集到的近兩年的侵害個人信息權的事例為例,通過對公布的法律、法規(guī)和司法解釋的分析,以及結合國外的立法經驗對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下個人信息權侵權責任進行研究,提出針對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境的特殊化的責任承擔方式,以期解決侵權人所造成的“外部不經濟性”,在救濟被侵權人的同時實現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡產業(yè)的良性發(fā)展。本文主要從三個方面進行論述:第一部分是對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下的個人信息權侵權進行界定,包括對概念、侵權特征和侵權客體——人格利益和財產利益進行論述。第二部分是對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下的個人信息侵權的認定和判斷,首先是對侵權責任的主體予以分析;其次是明確歸責原則;再次,以網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境的特點為依托重點論述構成要件;最后,對免責事由作出了相應的說明。第三部分是針對網(wǎng)絡個人信息侵權的特性,提出特殊的責任方式以救濟受到侵害的個人信息權,一方面是借鑒其他國家和地區(qū)的做法對傳統(tǒng)責任方式的提出改革建議,另一方面是結合網(wǎng)絡特性,提出網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下特有的責任承擔方式的設想。
[Abstract]:The development of information industry makes everyone's life closely related to the Internet. However, when people use the Internet to freely express their opinions, buy goods and browse information, the situation of personal information being infringed cannot be underestimated. The infringement of personal information right under the network environment means that the infringer makes use of the network environment to improperly obtain, disclose, tamper and trade the information of the natural person who can be identified directly or indirectly. It infringes the control of information subject and the right to use information. Personal information covers personal interests, including names, portraits, reputation, privacy, and property interests arising from their use and exchange value. Therefore, personal information not only has the personal interests of human beings, but also has the commercial value that can be traded, which is of great value of protection. Because of the characteristics of the network itself, the infringement of personal information rights in the breadth, speed and depth of the impact of infringement has the characteristics that can not be compared with the traditional infringement, so we should pay attention to it. At the present stage, there is no special legislation on personal information protection in our country, and there is also a lack of special network basic law. The problem of network infringement of personal information right is scattered in various laws, regulations and judicial interpretations. This puts forward the challenge to the personal information right network infringement's cognizance and relief. This paper takes the typical cases published by the Supreme Law and the cases collected on the Internet in the past two years as an example to analyze the published laws, regulations and judicial interpretations. Combining with the foreign legislative experience, the author studies the tort liability of personal information right under the network environment, and puts forward the special responsibility bearing way in view of the network environment, in order to solve the "external diseconomy" caused by the infringer. The benign development of the network industry can be realized at the same time as the relief to the infringed party. This article mainly carries on the elaboration from three aspects: the first part is carries on the definition to the personal information right infringement under the network environment, including to the concept, the tort characteristic and the tort object-the personality benefit and the property interest carries on the elaboration. The second part is the identification and judgment of personal information infringement under the network environment. Firstly, it analyzes the subject of tort liability; secondly, it clarifies the principle of imputation; thirdly, based on the characteristics of the network environment, it discusses the constitutive elements. A corresponding explanation is given on the reasons for the exemption. The third part is aimed at the characteristic of network personal information infringement, puts forward the special responsibility way to remedy the infringed personal information right, on the one hand, it puts forward the reform suggestion to the traditional responsibility way by drawing lessons from the practice of other countries and regions. On the other hand, combining the characteristics of network, this paper puts forward the assumption of special responsibility assumption under the network environment.
【學位授予單位】：中國青年政治學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 王澤鑒;;人格權的具體化及其保護范圍·隱私權篇(中)[J];比較法研究;2009年01期

2 汪洪;祝建軍;;人格符號的財產利益保護之法理思考[J];法律適用;2007年03期

3 齊愛民;;個人信息保護法研究[J];河北法學;2008年04期

4 劉德良;隱私與隱私權問題研究[J];社會科學;2003年08期

，

本文編號：1853381