本文選題：體育比賽 + 著作權(quán)保護之批判　； 參考：《知識產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年05期

【摘要】：體育競賽不能作為著作權(quán)法中的"作品"來保護,因為其不符合作品的構(gòu)成要件,同時用著作權(quán)予以保護還嚴(yán)重違背體育競技的基本精神。但"表演者權(quán)"制度可以用來保護競技者,這既符合著作權(quán)的基本法理,又與體育比賽的競技精神不謀而合,同時還有利于解釋"體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)"的法權(quán)來源,因此該做法可謂"一石多鳥",殊值我國立法和司法理論加以借鑒和運用。
[Abstract]:Sports competition can not be protected as a "work" in copyright law because it does not accord with the constitutive requirements of a work. At the same time, it also violates the basic spirit of sports competition seriously by using copyright to protect it. However, the system of "performer's right" can be used to protect athletes, which not only accords with the basic legal principle of copyright, but also coincides with the competitive spirit of sports competition, and also helps to explain the source of the legal right of "broadcasting right of sports events". Therefore, this practice can be described as "more birds with one stone", especially our legislation and judicial theory to draw lessons from and use it.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué);廣東東莞市第二人民法院;
【基金】：西南政法大學(xué)校級科研項目《體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律問題研究》(編號為:2016XZQN-05)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 戴建庭;未成年人在體育競賽中受到傷害誰該擔(dān)責(zé)?[J];小學(xué)生時代;2004年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1846342