本文選題：云計(jì)算 + 版權(quán)�。� 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于云計(jì)算這一技術(shù)與服務(wù)模式的創(chuàng)新,我們迎來了大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代。面對信息領(lǐng)域這一深刻的變革,云計(jì)算帶來了繼計(jì)算機(jī)、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)后對版權(quán)制度的第三次沖擊。但同時(shí)云計(jì)算技術(shù)是對分布式計(jì)算技術(shù)的一種繼承和發(fā)展,對版權(quán)領(lǐng)域的影響在于作品復(fù)制方式的改變,本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)采取保守的研究態(tài)度,在現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)的基礎(chǔ)上出臺(tái)相應(yīng)的司法解釋細(xì)化適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并積極探討版權(quán)授權(quán)模式這一主動(dòng)規(guī)制云計(jì)算作品傳播環(huán)境的途徑。導(dǎo)論首先介紹了云計(jì)算環(huán)境下版權(quán)制度問題研究的研究背景和意義,在云計(jì)算迅速發(fā)展之初通過對其版權(quán)問題的研究為今后云計(jì)算環(huán)境下作品保護(hù)提供良好的環(huán)境。之后介紹了對這一問題的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀;第一章具體介紹了云計(jì)算的定義、特征、服務(wù)模式,了解云計(jì)算對版權(quán)復(fù)制產(chǎn)生的影響;第二章通過對兩個(gè)臨時(shí)復(fù)制典型案例的介紹引出云計(jì)算環(huán)境下臨時(shí)復(fù)制問題的爭議焦點(diǎn),之后通過對臨時(shí)復(fù)制行為特點(diǎn)分析闡明其不構(gòu)成復(fù)制權(quán)的侵犯,最后在其不納入復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)的前提下,討論信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)和出租權(quán)是否可以對臨時(shí)復(fù)制行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制;第三章通過對IPTV運(yùn)營模式的概述引出IPTV“回看”模式這一版權(quán)爭議問題,之后通過對該模式的詳細(xì)分析,得出IPTV“回看”模式可以有信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)加以規(guī)制,但因?yàn)榘鏅?quán)人利益受損并不大且從鼓勵(lì)技術(shù)發(fā)展的角度看,提前談判分享利益是一種共贏之選;第四章通過對第三方插件侵權(quán)案件的概述引出兩種不同類的插件侵權(quán)類型,同時(shí)分析云計(jì)算環(huán)境下第三方插件侵權(quán)該如何規(guī)制;第五章闡明云計(jì)算對版權(quán)制度的沖擊本質(zhì)上是作品復(fù)制方式的改變,之后從技術(shù)中立角度說明法律制度不應(yīng)過于遏制技術(shù)的發(fā)展,并積極探尋法律以外的解決途徑——版權(quán)授權(quán)模式。
[Abstract]:Due to cloud computing technology and service model innovation, we ushered in big data era. In the face of this profound change in the field of information, cloud computing has brought the third impact on copyright system after computers and the Internet. But at the same time, cloud computing technology is a kind of inheritance and development of distributed computing technology, and the influence on copyright field lies in the change of the way of reproduction of works. This paper holds that we should adopt a conservative research attitude. On the basis of the existing laws and regulations, the corresponding judicial interpretation is introduced to refine the applicable standards, and actively explore the copyright licensing model, an active way to regulate the cloud computing work dissemination environment. The introduction first introduces the background and significance of the research on copyright system in cloud computing environment. At the beginning of the rapid development of cloud computing, it provides a good environment for the future work protection in cloud computing environment through the study of copyright issues. The first chapter introduces the definition, characteristics, service mode of cloud computing and the impact of cloud computing on copyright replication. In the second chapter, through the introduction of two typical cases of temporary replication, it leads to the controversy focus of temporary replication in cloud computing environment, and then through the analysis of the characteristics of temporary replication behavior, it clarifies that it does not constitute an infringement of replication rights. Finally, on the premise that it does not include the protection of reproduction right, the paper discusses whether the right of information network communication and the right to rent can regulate the temporary reproduction behavior; The third chapter introduces the copyright dispute of IPTV "look back" mode by summarizing the operation mode of IPTV, and then through the detailed analysis of this mode, it concludes that the "back view" mode of IPTV can be regulated by the right of information network transmission. However, because the interests of copyright owners are not seriously damaged and from the perspective of encouraging the development of technology, it is a win-win option to negotiate ahead of time to share the benefits. Chapter four introduces two different types of plug-in infringement through the overview of third-party plug-in infringement cases. At the same time, it analyzes how to regulate the infringement of third-party plug-in under the cloud computing environment. Chapter five clarifies that the impact of cloud computing on copyright system is essentially the change of the way of reproduction of works. Then, from the point of view of technology neutrality, it explains that the legal system should not contain the development of technology too much, and actively explore the solution outside the law-copyright licensing mode.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 周洪濤;單曉光;;第三方插件與軟件著作權(quán)保護(hù)——以珊瑚蟲版QQ案為視角[J];東方法學(xué);2008年05期

2 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

3 唐春;;基于云計(jì)算模式特點(diǎn)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)新問題探討[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年12期

4 許穎;陳芳;蔣潔;;SaaS模式下使用軟件行為的性質(zhì)探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年36期

5 鮑征燁;;云計(jì)算著作權(quán)問題探析——以SaaS模式為例[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

6 韓元牧;吳莉娟;;SaaS法律問題研究[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評論;2009年00期

，

本文編號：1802058