本文選題：所有權(quán) + 住宅小區(qū)　； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著《物權(quán)法》的公布,小區(qū)停車位所有權(quán)問題得到一定程度的明確,但是由于《物權(quán)法》及其司法解釋過于原則化,不夠具體,不同的學(xué)者和當事人對法律的理解也有不少分歧,實務(wù)操作面臨很多困難。本文就是依據(jù)上述的立法背景,通過價值分析和比較分析等方法對當前我國小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬問題進行闡述和分析。首先是對小區(qū)停車位問題的概述,對當前小區(qū)停車位的種類及權(quán)屬進行討論,學(xué)術(shù)界對于小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬的觀點也不同,主要有約定歸屬說、業(yè)主共有說以及面積公攤說,我國當前采用的是約定歸屬的觀點,從《物權(quán)法》中的規(guī)定也可以看出,但是約定歸屬看似是一種公平的方式,在實務(wù)中業(yè)主卻處于一種弱勢的地位,開發(fā)商掌握著絕大部分的信息及采用格式合同,業(yè)主幾乎沒有談判的余地,本文通過對專有權(quán)和共有權(quán)提出自己的一些見解;其次是通過對外國和中國臺灣有關(guān)小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬問題的闡述對比,發(fā)現(xiàn)可以借鑒的一些立法模式,比如臺灣的分類設(shè)定停車位以及德國規(guī)定的通過立法明確停車位的權(quán)屬的方法,但借鑒的過程中也要考慮到我國的人口眾多等的一些國情;最后就是對小區(qū)停車位問題的立法完善,包括對《物權(quán)法》第74條的規(guī)定進行完善,明確“首先滿足業(yè)主需要”的具體要求,明確“其他場地”的具體含義等。同時也要完善其他相關(guān)法律制度,例如不動產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記制度的完善以及房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)信息公開制度的完善等,通過法規(guī)之間的相互配合解決好小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬問題,減少糾紛的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:With the publication of the property Law, the ownership of parking spaces in residential areas has been clarified to a certain extent. However, due to the fact that the property Law and its judicial interpretation are too principled, they are not specific enough.Different scholars and parties have different understanding of the law and face many difficulties in practice.This article is based on the above legislative background, through the value analysis and comparative analysis of the current residential parking space ownership issues are expounded and analyzed.First of all, it summarizes the problem of parking spaces in residential areas, discusses the types and ownership of parking spaces in residential areas at present. The academic community has different views on the ownership of parking spaces in residential areas. There are mainly agreed ownership theories, owners' co-ownership theory and area sharing theory.At present, our country adopts the view of contractual attribution, which can also be seen from the provisions of Real right Law, but it seems that the contractual attribution is a fair way, but in practice the owner is in a weak position.Developers hold most of the information and use of format contracts, the owners almost no room for negotiation, this article through the exclusive right and co-ownership to put forward their own views;Secondly, by comparing the ownership of parking spaces in residential areas between foreign countries and Taiwan, we can find some legislative models that can be used for reference.For example, the classified setting of parking spaces in Taiwan and the German method of defining the ownership of parking spaces through legislation should also take into account some national conditions such as the large population of our country.Finally, it is to perfect the legislation of parking spaces in residential areas, including the provisions of Article 74 of the property Law, the specific requirements of "meeting the needs of the owners first", and the specific meaning of "other venues" and so on.At the same time, it is also necessary to improve other relevant legal systems, such as the perfection of the unified registration system of real estate and the perfection of the information disclosure system of the real estate industry, so as to solve the problem of ownership of parking spaces in residential areas through the mutual cooperation of laws and regulations.Reduce the occurrence of disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張鴻浩;;住宅小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬問題研究[J];住宅產(chǎn)業(yè);2013年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王天榮;住宅小區(qū)停車位法律問題研究[D];山東財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

2 葉新元;小區(qū)停車位權(quán)屬問題研究[D];新疆師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1765363