本文選題：政府信息公開(kāi)　切入點(diǎn)：司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)　出處：《安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：隱私概念的不確定性給行政機(jī)關(guān)判斷相關(guān)信息是否應(yīng)當(dāng)公開(kāi)帶來(lái)了困難。我國(guó)的行政訴訟中往往通過(guò)當(dāng)事人的公開(kāi)意愿、公開(kāi)行為、社會(huì)一般的認(rèn)知、對(duì)隱私權(quán)人的不利影響等因素來(lái)判斷相關(guān)信息是否屬于個(gè)人隱私。公開(kāi)申請(qǐng)人是密切的利害關(guān)系人、公開(kāi)的利益優(yōu)于不公開(kāi)的利益、法律強(qiáng)制公開(kāi)這三種情形構(gòu)成了隱私保護(hù)的例外。通過(guò)對(duì)司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的整理,行政機(jī)關(guān)可以通過(guò)強(qiáng)制公開(kāi)的法律規(guī)定、申請(qǐng)人的資格、當(dāng)事人的意愿、社會(huì)的一般認(rèn)知以及利益衡量等五個(gè)步驟的審查來(lái)確認(rèn)是否給予相關(guān)信息以隱私權(quán)的保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:The uncertainty of the concept of privacy makes it difficult for the administrative organs to judge whether the relevant information should be made public. In our administrative litigation, it is often through the public will of the parties, the public behavior, and the general cognition of the society. Factors such as the adverse influence on the privacy person to judge whether the relevant information belongs to personal privacy. The public applicant is a close interested party, and the public interest is superior to the private interest. The three situations of compulsory disclosure by law constitute an exception to the protection of privacy. Through the collation of judicial experience, the administrative organ may pass the compulsory disclosure of the law, the qualifications of the applicant, the will of the parties, The general cognition of society and the evaluation of benefits are examined to confirm whether the relevant information should be protected by the right of privacy.
【作者單位】： 上海行政學(xué)院公共管理教研部;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目(14CFX063)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D63;D923
，

本文編號(hào)：1666280